• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Great Western Electrification Progress

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,615
Location
Hampshire
When's Reading due for completion?

No idea I'm afraid, the answer should be somewhere within this thread - or at least within the next year to allow the Didcot - Padd 387s to start running.

In other news, work's finally started to get P1 & P2 wired at Paddington. https://twitter.com/BTPPaddington/status/804980420139950080

I believe this work also involves either raising or the replacement of the footbridge as well. I'm not sure why when wires can already fit under the rest of the bridge though.
 

Class 170101

On Moderation
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
8,661
I think East Coast would be delighted to receive a dozen brand new trains early in exchange for HSTs. Gives them a chance to be ready for all electric 800s in 2018/19. Hardly likely to dislocate their business plan when they are converting to 800s anyway.

Eventually, however the leasing costs of the IEPs will be more expensive than the HSTs / 91s so they might not be as willing as you imagine to swap from HSTs / 91s to IEP.
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,615
Location
Hampshire
I walked along P1 a week ago and was wondering when the wiring works would start.

Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't they the only un-electrified platforms now? Why weren't they electrified when all the others were?

Probably down to a case of no real need. The first round of OHLE was installed for HEX who have their own dedicated platforms, so it was probably seen as not necessary at the time. IIRC, the Suburban platforms were only done for HEC's arrival?
 

jyte

Member
Joined
27 Oct 2016
Messages
671
Location
in me shed
Probably down to a case of no real need. The first round of OHLE was installed for HEX who have their own dedicated platforms, so it was probably seen as not necessary at the time. IIRC, the Suburban platforms were only done for HEC's arrival?

Okay....

It just seems to be one of those 'on a shoestring' things...
 

gsnedders

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2015
Messages
1,472
Okay....

It just seems to be one of those 'on a shoestring' things...

Remember the HEx works were done at BAA's expense, who obviously had no interest in it. The HEC works excluding only P1 and P2 is slightly more surprising.
 

superkev

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2015
Messages
2,856
Location
west yorkshire
Watching some YouTube videos of pileing each one looked to take less than 5 min. On that basis they could probably be half way across the Irish sea. Very puzzling.
Admittably all the videos where of a hammer or auger fastened to an excavator rather than the HOPS factory train.
K
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,854
Location
Beeston (Notts)
Sorry? I don't really understand.

MarkLong appears to be questioning why every Network Rail project in London seems to be running to time, but no projects anywhere else in the country are. He clearly hasn't seen Norton Bridge, Banbury or the Hinksey flood alleviation. ;)

In all seriousness though, it's a question of scale. Most of the projects in and around London have been relatively small (Crossrail excepted).
 

SpacePhoenix

Established Member
Joined
18 Mar 2014
Messages
5,491
Between the buffer stops at Paddington and where the Heathrow branch leaves the GWML, was all the existing OLE equipment (including masts) kept or has it been replaced as part of the overall GWML electrification?
 

jyte

Member
Joined
27 Oct 2016
Messages
671
Location
in me shed
MarkLong appears to be questioning why every Network Rail project in London seems to be running to time, but no projects anywhere else in the country are. He clearly hasn't seen Norton Bridge, Banbury or the Hinksey flood alleviation. ;)

In all seriousness though, it's a question of scale. Most of the projects in and around London have been relatively small (Crossrail excepted).

Yeah that's what I was thinking.

Besides I was under the impression that only the 'new' bits of Crossrail (the tunnels) are running to time, and NR is struggling to deliver the OHLE upgrade to Shenfield on time... we know about the GWML problems already.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Between the buffer stops at Paddington and where the Heathrow branch leaves the GWML, was all the existing OLE equipment (including masts) kept or has it been replaced as part of the overall GWML electrification?

As I understand it, almost all of it will be kept with the exception of some large "at risk" headspans that will be converted to portals.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,902
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Between the buffer stops at Paddington and where the Heathrow branch leaves the GWML, was all the existing OLE equipment (including masts) kept or has it been replaced as part of the overall GWML electrification?

I think the answer is that it has been/is being selectively upgraded.
There is extensive new OHLE kit for Crossrail and IEP (to reach depots and upgrade the power supply etc).
The new underpass at Acton changed all the OHLE in the area.
The rebuild of Airport Jn likewise changed a lot in the Hayes area.
The main line catenary is also being upgraded for 125mph (possibly 140mph, don't know).
Some headspan installations have been replaced by portals.
If you run past Kensal Green/Old Oak Common you will see vast new OHLE installations at the lineside.
But I expect some of the original HEx project stuff is unchanged, say Ealing-Hayes.
 

jyte

Member
Joined
27 Oct 2016
Messages
671
Location
in me shed
On an unrelated note what do people think the government's decision to give TOC's maintenance powers will do to the GWML upgrade?

Oxford reached sooner or later?
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,902
Location
Mold, Clwyd
On an unrelated note what do people think the government's decision to give TOC's maintenance powers will do to the GWML upgrade?
Oxford reached sooner or later?

If it's tied to franchise replacement, that's not till April 2019 for ICGW (if GWR doesn't get an extension).
I think they will start with somewhere a bit simpler than the GW route.
 

coppercapped

Established Member
Joined
13 Sep 2015
Messages
3,315
Location
Reading
On an unrelated note what do people think the government's decision to give TOC's maintenance powers will do to the GWML upgrade?

Oxford reached sooner or later?

It's a proposal at the moment, not a decision.

And you've misunderstood what is being proposed.
 

Shaw S Hunter

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2016
Messages
3,486
Location
Over The Hill
Sorry, my understanding from the BBC today was that the DaFT had decided to move forward with the proposals.

The information on that matter that we have so far is simply the contents of a speech to be given to a right wing think tank. That is not the same as a proposal being brought to Parliament. It's quite possible that nothing happens beyond speechifying.
 

jyte

Member
Joined
27 Oct 2016
Messages
671
Location
in me shed
The information on that matter that we have so far is simply the contents of a speech to be given to a right wing think tank. That is not the same as a proposal being brought to Parliament. It's quite possible that nothing happens beyond speechifying.

You just made day better, thank you.
 
Last edited:

MarkLong

Member
Joined
20 Sep 2016
Messages
106
MarkLong appears to be questioning why every Network Rail project in London seems to be running to time, but no projects anywhere else in the country are. He clearly hasn't seen Norton Bridge, Banbury or the Hinksey flood alleviation. ;)

In all seriousness though, it's a question of scale. Most of the projects in and around London have been relatively small (Crossrail excepted).

Sorry, I mean electrification program, The Gospel Oak to Barking electrification appears to be delivered on time. But other part of UK's electrification suffers from delay. Scotland's EGIP for 5 months, Northern's Liverpool-Manchester for at least 3 months, and GWML for years...
 

jyte

Member
Joined
27 Oct 2016
Messages
671
Location
in me shed
Sorry, I mean electrification program, The Gospel Oak to Barking electrification appears to be delivered on time. But other part of UK's electrification suffers from delay. Scotland's EGIP for 5 months, Northern's Liverpool-Manchester for at least 3 months, and GWML for years...

This is my understanding. Firstly, Gospel Oak to Barking is getting a lot of TfL funding so is less likely to be delayed due to spending reviews.

Secondly, I was actually under the impression that Gospel Oak - Barking is running running about 6 months behind schedule, despite a complete line closure for over 6 months.
 

MarkLong

Member
Joined
20 Sep 2016
Messages
106
This is my understanding. Firstly, Gospel Oak to Barking is getting a lot of TfL funding so is less likely to be delayed due to spending reviews.

Secondly, I was actually under the impression that Gospel Oak - Barking is running running about 6 months behind schedule, despite a complete line closure for over 6 months.

Thanks for point out my mistakes, but then NR can not deliver any electrification project on time.... so sad.
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
GOBLIN is a fairly simple electrification - low speed, relatively few engineering challenges, recently upgraded, and fairly short. A lot of the other projects that have overrun haven't exactly been similar in difficulty to GOBLIN.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,902
Location
Mold, Clwyd
GOBLIN is a fairly simple electrification - low speed, relatively few engineering challenges, recently upgraded, and fairly short. A lot of the other projects that have overrun haven't exactly been similar in difficulty to GOBLIN.

I wouldn't say that.
Per mile, it's probably one of the most complex lines to electrify, with all the different structures, many elevated, and the connections to multiple main lines.
And closing the line for months to lower a long section of track (to avoid traffic chaos raising the bridges) seems to have been a big (and expensive) job.
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
10,474
Location
Preston Lancs
I wouldn't say that.
Per mile, it's probably one of the most complex lines to electrify, with all the different structures, many elevated, and the connections to multiple main lines.
And closing the line for months to lower a long section of track (to avoid traffic chaos raising the bridges) seems to have been a big (and expensive) job.

And because of those connections, neutral sections galore.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
8,245
GOBLIN is a fairly simple electrification - low speed, relatively few engineering challenges, recently upgraded, and fairly short. A lot of the other projects that have overrun haven't exactly been similar in difficulty to GOBLIN.

Really? Massive engineering challenges on a challenges per mile basis. Still lots of issue to be dealt with even after the blockades (such as under-bridge deck replacements* on the most eastern section to improve speed limits from 20 /30mph)

Most of the piles (76% by total mast numbers) were installed before the 8month blockade which is mostly for civils work such as track lowering, bridge rebuilds and embankments /retaining wall works. The non pile bases are mostly being done during the blockade which is comparitively high number of non piled bases.

The GOBlin cost per mile is roughly the same as the current increased (Nov '16) GW electrification cost per mile...
4 new Bridge decks*, 6 strengthened* another 16 modified, 4 sections of track lowering including a 1.7km stretch 50cm lower through a station (to avoid even more bridge works). All platforms rebuilt or lenghtened. Lots of slab track on the lowered sections. Moving sewers and storm drains underneath the tracks...

But only 28 single track miles.

*more under-bridges post blockade during more weekend closures.

There is very good reason it wasn't done sooner.
 
Last edited:

Class 170101

On Moderation
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
8,661
Sorry, I mean electrification program, The Gospel Oak to Barking electrification appears to be delivered on time. But other part of UK's electrification suffers from delay. Scotland's EGIP for 5 months, Northern's Liverpool-Manchester for at least 3 months, and GWML for years...

I'll believe it when I see regarding the GOB being on time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top