• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Grand Central Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

mealybar

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2008
Messages
39
What's happened today? Ok to the morning run to York, and now no report for the 14:16 to Kings Cross?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

1D53

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2006
Messages
2,885
Hasn't reported at all, presumed cancelled?
Posted via Mobile Device
 

1D53

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2006
Messages
2,885
1650 doesn't seem to have run either.
Posted via Mobile Device
 

williamn

Established Member
Joined
22 May 2008
Messages
1,657
Its pretty pathetic! I cant seem it lasting much longer.
Even their website is hopelessly out of date - most of it talks as if the service hasn't launched yet. You would have thought they would have time to update it given the months they were waiting for the service to start.
 

voyagerdude220

Established Member
Joined
13 Oct 2005
Messages
4,262
I second that, gingerheid, especially considering that GC has just introduced those very good off-peak fares, which I would like to use sometime, when they get their services running reliably...
 

1D53

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2006
Messages
2,885
0641 from Sunderland this morning only got to York.
 

williamn

Established Member
Joined
22 May 2008
Messages
1,657
Wouldn't it be better to suspend services until they are confident of reliability? Better to run no trains than to let down customers almost everyday.
 

1D53

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2006
Messages
2,885
0641 from York was actually the Duffs, so no HSTs out thus far.
 

BlueGrey

Member
Joined
23 May 2008
Messages
49
Wouldn't it be better to suspend services until they are confident of reliability? Better to run no trains than to let down customers almost everyday.

Thats perhaps not a bad idea. I mean no trains is probally not really much worse than running a service which pretty much sounds unusable at the moment. The problem at the moment is they are getting a horrendous reputation. Would suspending the service even save them money because if they are paying all the late running / cancellation charges themselves plus having to pay to hire loco's and drivers in they must be losing an incredible amount of money.
 

devon_metro

Established Member
Joined
11 Oct 2005
Messages
7,715
Location
London
I agree, I think the shuttles should continues as there is market for travel in that area, but whilst reliability to London is so hit and miss, they should suspend services south of York.
 

westcoaster

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2006
Messages
4,493
Location
DTOS A or B
if thet were to suspend the journey south of york to london will they not forfit there paths thus rendering the service a failure .
 

BlueGrey

Member
Joined
23 May 2008
Messages
49
if thet were to suspend the journey south of york to london will they not forfit there paths thus rendering the service a failure .

I hope not but with the way the railway is run it wouldn't surprise me. However I believe several TOCs have implemented emergency timetables in the past for various reasons and I don't believe any of them ever had to give any paths up.
 

mealybar

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2008
Messages
39
Looks like the HST set is making its way out of Heaton, I've just past it. Saw #80 on the back, didnt see the front. There's also a PC and a coach standing out at Heaton.
 

1D53

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2006
Messages
2,885
Probably going down to start the 1650 on time. I doubt they'll suspend services, Network Rail's attitude to passenger paths is use them or lose then
Posted via Mobile Device
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Actually 1650 not left yet but then again there is a fatality in the area.
Posted via Mobile Device
 

Ben

Member
Joined
8 Jun 2005
Messages
998
No report on LBD from KGX, presumably failed on the way down somewhere?
 

37402

Member
Joined
15 May 2007
Messages
532
The HST didn't do anything in passenger service today. Ran HT-York-HT midday, presumably a test run (ho ho). Was seen pottering about HT at 1915.

The duffs did the morning Sunderland-York in place of HST, did the normal shuttles and then did the evening York-Sunderland again in place of the HST.
 

1D53

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2006
Messages
2,885
HST today:

1A60 0653 Ex SUN = 1 early
1N26 1127 Ex KGX = 1 late
1A62 1417 Ex YRK = 8 early
1N28 1650 Ex KGX = On Time at Northallerton.
 

37402

Member
Joined
15 May 2007
Messages
532
Don't speak too soon. Sounds like the oil from the engine of 43080 now adorns the side of the coaches.
 

1D53

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2006
Messages
2,885
Oops! Still going mind, 3 late through Billingham.

The Duffs haven't been perfect either today, bout 30 late at one point!
 

Sir_Clagalot

Member
Joined
9 Aug 2007
Messages
853
Yeay! A train to play with! Now, what am I supposed to do?:grin:;)
Apart from the oil not a bad run today.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,217
Location
Yorkshire
According to Tony Miles on the wnxx forum, GC have reached the maximum amount of money they are required to pay out for delaying other TOCs (not sure if it's for this year or for a fixed period or what), therefore every time a GC service fails, NR has to compensate the other TOCs for their delay minutes.

NR are, to quote Tony, "very concerned about this and is debating what action to take next" :-?. Apparently there is also a new Route Director for the ECML who is looking to save every penny...

I really hope NR does not take action that would be detrimental to GC or it's passengers.
 

BOSCH

Member
Joined
18 Oct 2007
Messages
492
According to Tony Miles on the wnxx forum, GC have reached the maximum amount of money they are required to pay out for delaying other TOCs (not sure if it's for this year or for a fixed period or what), therefore every time a GC service fails, NR has to compensate the other TOCs for their delay minutes.

NR are, to quote Tony, "very concerned about this and is debating what action to take next" :-?. Apparently there is also a new Route Director for the ECML who is looking to save every penny...

I really hope NR does not take action that would be detrimental to GC or it's passengers.

Yes I read that as well,another good post from Tony "I hate GC" Miles !!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top