No, it's because there's not enough time to get the train to Sunderland and back, without adding a completely new diagram (which is not possible given GC's small fleet).
How does it manage on the Saturday?
No, it's because there's not enough time to get the train to Sunderland and back, without adding a completely new diagram (which is not possible given GC's small fleet).
How does it manage on the Saturday?
Rubbish, it has nothing to do with diagramming issues - they applied to run to/from Sunderland. They do not have the rights because there is no Southbound path available between Sunderland and Hartlepool.No, it's because there's not enough time to get the train to Sunderland and back, without adding a completely new diagram (which is not possible given GC's small fleet).
ORR said:Subsequently, potential paths were identified for the additional services which Grand Central was seeking (subject to performance modelling and safety assessment), but the southbound Weekday path could only start from Hartlepool and one of Grand Centrals existing services would have to terminate at Hartlepool in order to form the return service. On 4 July 2012 Grand Central confirmed that the paths would be acceptable (though it was continuing to work with Network Rail to try to improve one of the paths).
43. This explains why we can only grant Firm Rights for the Weekday services between Hartlepool and Kings Cross. However, if in a future timetable it is possible to timetable the trains to run to and from Sunderland, we would be happy to consider making the rights between Hartlepool and Sunderland firm.