CornwallBus
Member
Not GoCornwall bus exactly but is there a list of Truronian liveried Coaches, fleet numbers, registrations etc?
If you publish a timetable book you should put all your scheduled regular public services in it, especially as in this case it's the Transport for Cornwall timetable book published on behalf of the enhanced partnership.Surely the summer services are likely to only be used by tourists, who are unlikely to be looking at a timetable book? Therefore having them posted at bus stops / information centres / holiday parks or online etc would be the best bet.
Certainly when I went to Cornwall on holiday recently, I went on the website to find out what they had.
Update: I'm glad to be proven wrong! They're being posted at bus stops.Will the summer timetables be displayed on bus stops? Given that no timetables have been displayed on the new section of route 4 between Madron and Pendeen since it was introduced in February, I would guess the answer is no. I hope to be proved wrong!

Haha, of course, yes locals do like to go travelling and yes you're right it does seem weird that they don't put them in the book.If you publish a timetable book you should put all your scheduled regular public services in it, especially as in this case it's the Transport for Cornwall timetable book published on behalf of the enhanced partnership.
As for the comment highlighted, believe it or not locals do like to go out by bus for leisure trips during the summer!
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Update: I'm glad to be proven wrong! They're being posted at bus stops.![]()
In my past experience the other reason is that the timetables had not been finalised before proofing or printing schedule dates.There are several ideas which they would have considered in choosing not to include the summer dated timetables in the timetable book.
These may include:
The timetable book is expensive - try not to give it to tourist just for a few journeys.
Produce cheaper tourists leaflets instead as adverts, plus all routes are on the journey planner.
Younger tourists use online resources and not paper anyway.
Many people are poor an understanding timetable notes - putting in multiple copies of the same route just causes confusion as they don't spot the dates.
Just keep the book simple and hopefully valid until sometime in 2027.
Cornwall is not financially wealthy and what funds are available go on service provision and not paper advertising.
Hopefully bus stop timetables are updated for the summer where applicable.
I am more interested in the summer provision out of St Austell - 24B, 26A, 29. There don't seem to be leaflets for them.
They're all potentially valid points. However, as I pointed out there's enough filler adverts in the book to be able to include the timetables without the need for extra pages. Not that extra pages would cost that much more, and certainly probably less than the cost of individual leaflets for each route.There are several ideas which they would have considered in choosing not to include the summer dated timetables in the timetable book.
These may include:
The timetable book is expensive - try not to give it to tourist just for a few journeys.
Produce cheaper tourists leaflets instead as adverts, plus all routes are on the journey planner.
Younger tourists use online resources and not paper anyway.
Many people are poor an understanding timetable notes - putting in multiple copies of the same route just causes confusion as they don't spot the dates.
Just keep the book simple and hopefully valid until sometime in 2027.
Cornwall is not financially wealthy and what funds are available go on service provision and not paper advertising.
Hopefully bus stop timetables are updated for the summer where applicable.
I am more interested in the summer provision out of St Austell - 24B, 26A, 29. There don't seem to be leaflets for them.
Meanwhile, Go-Ahead's Go South Coast division understands that encouraging tourists to use their bus networks in touristy areas might increase revenue (and a few less cars on the road to contend with). As a result, a tourist on the Isle of Wight can pick up a Southern Vectis timetable book to put in their bag and take back to their accommodation, see journey options and plan days out, and then deposit said book back in one of the large boxes at key places (like bus stations, ferry terminals etc) at the end of their bus travels for another tourist to then pick up and reuse.The timetable book is expensive - try not to give it to tourist just for a few journeys.
I think it just all illustrates Go South West's rather ambivalent approach to marketing and publicity. But hey, at least we're not in the realms of "it's all online" as with some operators.
The summer routes are commercial, as are many routes in the book.Is it really Go South West's fault? Or Cornwall Council not agreeing any funding in time? Are these purely commercial initiatives?
Interesting! So perhaps this is a GoAhead thing. Not including routes such as the 40 and 50, which are the year-round services connecting Swanage with the outside world seems singularly unhelpful.It should be noted that this year, GSC have not included any of the Morebus Breezer routes, including the newly branded 81/82 in the main summer timetable booklet. They are only available in separate leaflets.
Not really the same because this extra leaflet for the Morebus breezers is available just as widely as the main timetable book isInteresting! So perhaps this is a GoAhead thing. Not including routes such as the 40 and 50, which are the year-round services connecting Swanage with the outside world seems singularly unhelpful.
A friend of mine managed to pick up a timetable book at Penzance today. None of the leaflets were available though.It remains to be seen if these extra GCB leaflets are available widely, or indeed if the main timetable book even is. Has it not been like hens teeth in recent times.
I wouldn’t complain though, as it wouldn’t be a stretch for someone to just decide to do no printed timetable at all
There were 4 whole pallets of timetables delivered to summercourt the other day, the supervisor was only expecting one!. Whether the brown outer boxes had leaflets or full timetables or both i could not say as they were clad in shrink wrap still.Not really the same because this extra leaflet for the Morebus breezers is available just as widely as the main timetable book is
It remains to be seen if these extra GCB leaflets are available widely, or indeed if the main timetable book even is. Has it not been like hens teeth in recent times.
I wouldn’t complain though, as it wouldn’t be a stretch for someone to just decide to do no printed timetable at all
Yes, they've been doing this ever since the full timetable was introduced following the reopening of Chywoone Hill.I see the 1/1A will now loop around the village of Paul in the same direction both ways, presumably buses kept meeting each other, since they changed the services to run a through bus through the village.
Would be clearer if it was numbered 93P or similar.The Newquay Park & Ride using the same service number (93) as a regular hourly service to Truro seems unnecessarily complicated, especially as this route will be used mostly by visitors unfamiliar with the bus network. Try explaining that they need to catch the 93 but not *that* 93 as the Truro journeys don’t serve the P&R site on the way back, on top of the fact that Newquay Bus Station is a tad disorganised at the best of times.
Variation history
- Received24 Jun 26
- Effective26 Jul 26
Provision of extra Sunday/BH journeys to cater for unexpected demand
The vehicles run through to Mevagissey on the additional 29’s so are spaced at that end. The 24B is a different route between St Austell and Fowey.24B is a weird timetable. It makes sense on Sundays, but for the other days it seems to shadow the 24. eg both leave Fowey at 12:30, 13:30 etc instead of something like 24 at 12:30, 24B at 13:00, etc.
I remember the outrage on here about First using buses that didn't have Kernow fleetnames...Finally, far too many buses with Plymouth Citybus fleetnames, in the areas dominated by ex-First services it seems to be every other bus.
A good chunk of it follows the exact same route minus the hospital. To have a mevagissey-fowey route for summer tourists that ignores charletown seems very short sighted. It is all timed for the convenience of fitting between time a and time b rather than what is best for fitting in with other services and places.The vehicles run through to Mevagissey on the additional 29’s so are spaced at that end. The 24B is a different route between St Austell and Fowey.
I guess this means none of the other new route numbers, eg 4B, have been added either.I happened to be in Cornwall when the summer uplift started, destination blinds haven’t been programmed for the 19, so buses just had the number on a bit of paper in the window. Timetable books widely available, but I haven’t seen any of the summer leaflets.
This work has been going on since late last year and was supposed to be completed in a few weeks. But then we shouldn't be surprised given that it's Cormac, the council's in-house contractor which has a reputation for slowness and doing everything "dreckly".The council have decided to redevelop the main stop in St Ives in the middle of high summer, so it’s been pushed even further up the hill than normal.
The new arrangements in Mousehole are not helped by the council recently shortening the bus stand bay in order to fit in another two car parking spaces. Now not even the shortest E200s can pull in straight. Nice one Cornwall Council! Also some drivers now set down only at the stop, then turn and pick up on the opposite side of the road where there's no pavement.In Mousehole the permanent bus stop is further out of the village than the arrangements used to be when First ran a double decker on the M6. I observed two buses and they both did the reversal in opposite ways to each other.
I'd have thought this would have been sorted by now. It's over five months since the expansion. Obviously the operator can use whatever liveried buses they like on their commercial routes, but PCB buses are equally widespread on contracted services. Together with buses acquired new for TfC services moving to Devon-contracted Dartline services it makes me wonder how much oversight the council has. But then with GoAhead now having a virtual monopoly it can pretty much dictate terms to the council.Finally, far too many buses with Plymouth Citybus fleetnames, in the areas dominated by ex-First services it seems to be every other bus.
What were the loadings like?I was out on the 7/7A today, very busy all round and stunning as usual. On the way out in the morning, I had a former Stagecoach London E400 with TfC/GCB fleetnames. Despite the seat padding looking worn out and the odd TfL advert inside, a well presented bus, no complaints really. The driver was wearing a former FirstBus jacket which I found amusing.
On the return journey, I also had an E400, this time with PCB fleetnames but with a TfC/GCB sticker at the rear. There was a slip of paper in the window showing the service number (both 7 & 7A) and the destination blind unhelpfully displayed "Private Hire". The driver explained that the destination blind hadn't been updated and informed everyone boarding that it was the 7A towards St Ives. Despite being 20 years old, the E400 coped well on the route and the numerous steep inclines it encountered.