This thread is a bit old isnt it?
... which just goes to show that quality always rises to the top!
Enjoyed rereading the posts here. But I think we need to distinguish between stations which just have a statutory train to avoid the pain of the closure process (Teesside Airport, for instance), and those which have a minimal service but are reasonably well used, or provide a commuter link, or a social service (such as Chathill), and those which probably have potential to generate traffic, if only more trains stopped (such as Blaydon).
There must be lots of stations like Blaydon. It's only five miles west of Newcastle, with good parking nearby, but only three trains a day each way. The roads to Newcastle are a traffic jam every morning, regardless of which way you go. The train can do it in twelve minutes. Blaydon has shops, a JobCentre, a McDonalds, homes and substantial employment at its industrial estates. ONE North East keeps talking about erecting a foot & cycle bridge across the Tyne to the site at Newburn, too. The cost of stopping the Hexham trains would be minimal - whatever the additonal fuel cost of stopping then restarting a 142 is - but the potential benefits, in terms of improved journey opportunities for the locals, better access to work for job seekers, better access for labour for businesses, surely must outweigh a few bob in fuel?
So, can you come up with other, low-cost service improvements for other, similarly under-utlised stations, which could be revenue-positive?
Regards
eezypeazy