• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

German Lane Bridges.

Status
Not open for further replies.

vidal

Member
Joined
23 Feb 2017
Messages
136
Location
Bolton
On a rather bleary walk today I crossed under the WCML at Charnock Richard - slightly south of Euxton Balshaw Lane. The line is quad tracked with quite a gap between the Fast and the Slow lines. It is elevated on an embankment to cross the River Yarrow. Google Map View.


I noted that on the fast lines it appears that the bridge abutments are of a size that would allow a further two tracks as seen in the attached photo. Were there ever 4 tracks on this span - there's nothing I can see on the historical maps from the National Library of Scotland map site.

James
 

Attachments

  • PXL_20251226_112657172.jpg
    PXL_20251226_112657172.jpg
    3.1 MB · Views: 73
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,922
Location
Airedale
I wondercif the original intention was to add 2 tracks on the Eastern side, but for whatever reason the LNW went for the current arrangement.
 

Acathater

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2025
Messages
660
Location
NorthWest
On a rather bleary walk today I crossed under the WCML at Charnock Richard - slightly south of Euxton Balshaw Lane. The line is quad tracked with quite a gap between the Fast and the Slow lines. It is elevated on an embankment to cross the River Yarrow. Google Map View.


I noted that on the fast lines it appears that the bridge abutments are of a size that would allow a further two tracks as seen in the attached photo. Were there ever 4 tracks on this span - there's nothing I can see on the historical maps from the National Library of Scotland map site.

James
Just a guess, but that concrete bridge is clearly not the original. I'd suggest that it was built on the "spare" abutments, then the original bridge demolished and new abutments built, then the replacement slid across. If you look there are differences in the two sets of abutments which suggest they were built independently of each other.
 

AndrewE

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2015
Messages
7,300
Just a guess, but that concrete bridge is clearly not the original. I'd suggest that it was built on the "spare" abutments, then the original bridge demolished and new abutments built, then the replacement slid across. If you look there are differences in the two sets of abutments which suggest they were built independently of each other.
That is a massive investment for building a new span, I'm sure that trestles would have been used instead. I'm going to search the NLS maps to see if I can find if the slow/freight lines were ever duplicated.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top