Peterthegreat
Established Member
Sultan of Brunei?
Correct - Hassanal Bolkiah ibni Omar Ali Saifuddien III, to give him his full title. Over to you.Sultan of Brunei?
Walk on the moon.Eugene Cernan was the last person to do what?
That is correct. Your turn to blast off with the next question.Walk on the moon.
Thank you.That is correct. Your turn to blast off with the next question.
Not in the majority of examples.An easily memorable number, like WHI 1212?
Apart from being the licence number of a taxi what is a "taxicab number"?
Is it a combination number for opening locks, safes, etc.?
Barristers having to take the next case when it is their turn - next cab off the rank.
I'm glad it's inspired some imaginative suggestions, alas none are correct.The number that us dinosaurs phone when we want to book one?![]()
No but you're in the right neighbourhood.Prime numbers?
A number which can be formed in two ways through the addition of cubes? 1729 is the lowest example of this (I forget the specific cubes used).
NoSquare numbers?
NoA number divisible by six other numbers?
I posed the question and I'm not sure I understand either.I googled it and still don’t understand it![]()
So close.I was looking at cubes and found that 1728 was a cube (12 x 12 x 12). So presumably adding 1 cubed would give you 1729.
1^3 + 12^3 = 9^3 + 10^3 = 1729A number which can be formed in two ways through the addition of cubes? 1729 is the lowest example of this (I forget the specific cubes used).
But why call it a taxicab number ???!!!No
No
I posed the question and I'm not sure I understand either.
So close.
1^3 + 12^3 = 9^3 + 10^3 = 1729
Some can be formed in more than two ways but essentially you are correct, your turn...
But why call it a taxicab number ???!!!
The name is derived from a conversation in about 1919 involving mathematicians G. H. Hardy and Srinivasa Ramanujan. As told by Hardy:
I remember once going to see him [Ramanujan] when he was lying ill at Putney. I had ridden in taxi-cab No. 1729, and remarked that the number seemed to be rather a dull one, and that I hoped it was not an unfavourable omen. "No," he replied, "it is a very interesting number; it is the smallest number expressible as the sum of two [positive] cubes in two different ways."