I think for my area at least, it’s quite difficult getting a reasonable overall picture of failure trends at the moment.
It also depends on what mixture of equipment you have…
Due to most of our area having experienced resignalling or substantial alterations over the last decade, I would say we are still on the sloping edge of the bath tub curve. Even if some of the so say new equipment is actually ‘serviced’ SSI (Solid State Interlocking) modules.
Actually thinking about it, even before that, we have not had long periods where no alterations have taken place. The railway have always been doing something somewhere.
The SSI modules (which were all brand new when originally installed) of the oldest scheme do appear to be far more reliable than those of the latest scheme. Note that the latest scheme covers a considerably bigger area.
On the latest scheme, a lot of the TFM (SSI Track side Functional Modules, such as signal or point types, housed in cabinets rather than actually being next to the track) appear to be serviced units rather than brand new units. The datalink and LDT (Long Distance Terminal telecommunications) modules are new. But lots of all have been replaced due to failures. With the datalink modules especially, there is a known difference between the reliability of the two different makes. With most of them being the less reliable make…
But due to most of these SSI modules failing at random no matter the weather, it’s hard to link any to high temperatures.
ASTER U type/SF15 type transmitters and occasionally receivers (parts of audio frequency jointless track circuits) were in the past the most likely to be affected by really hot summer days. But once the faulty item had been replaced, the same TC would be reliable for years afterwards.
TDM (Time Division Multiplex - a form of remote control system) or equivalent systems definitely work more reliably if not cooked. Similarly, axle counter ACE (axle counter evaluator) racks also are more reliable if the cubicle doors are permanently left open (or removed) and the air conditioning is operational and effective (the company have installed some extra permanently fitted AC units in some REBs).
UPS equipment also does not like being cooked.
I can’t, off the top of my head think of anything else that is especially cold or heat sensitive (apart from IRJs being affected by rail expansion) at the moment.
I do know that ASTER U type/SF15 type transmitters and receivers, signal flashers (for flashing aspects) and similar equipment will be affected by water getting into them.
Apart from flooding, physical damage from yellow painted things and telecommunications cables faults, the small number of AzLM H type axle counters that we had were very reliable. Not so for the new K type. But note that we do have thousands of these now.
They are all new equipment. The K type EAK (electronic junction box) is rubbish, if the case ‘cover’ (its on the ‘front’ side) is not done up fully, rain water leaks in the top and dribbles down over the PCB affecting the electronics. Condensation can also cause trouble.
The telecom type cables for these terminate in dis-boxes where Wago terminals are used exclusively. Some of these suffer badly from condensation (being a dis box, they don’t have 110V AC supplies so no case heater). Even resulting in terminals less than five years old having to be replaced.
On part of our area, we have modular conventional colour light signals. I call them modular because they are designed so that you can directly bolt multiple heads together vertically. Unfortunately that means that the seals in the top of every single one have to be perfect. They are not. So rain water finds it’s way in, dribbles over the electrical parts, and then the SSI module will shut down it’s output interface causing a critical alarm and a red signal that the signaller can’t clear.
AWS electro and suppressor magnets love to fill up with water, and hence test earthy…
I once had one where the water was right to the top, perfectly clear. Hence I did not notice until I went to put my hand in to check the tightness of the wiring! Got a bit of a surprise!
And then there are all the rubber multicore signalling cables that eventually turn to a poor impression of a sponge…
And of course, then there are the track circuits that fail due to poor ballast conditions (or should I say mud consistency for some…) and the points that fail when the water the mechanism is in freezes, or the mud builds up on the slide chairs.
Sorry, gone a bit off topic and into ramble mode. I’ll stop now.