Tim R-T-C
Established Member
- Joined
- 23 May 2011
- Messages
- 2,143
Dont they do a print at home service ?
For advance tickets on a specific operator's service only.
There is no agreed national system.
Dont they do a print at home service ?
Why is this happening?! Maybe ticket prices are too high. The highest price you pay for a First Classticket in the Netherlands is 37 Pounds.
Yes, but Great Britain is six times the size of the Netherlands.
Even Scotland's twice the size of the Netherlands.
For now, a terminal could sync tickets when there is coverage - just like any other database in the cloud. Would take a matter of seconds, so a later check could work even without a signal.
I doubt there are any routes with no signal anywhere, and if there were you'd deal with those problems individually.
There's a lot to be said for:
"I want to go to xxx"
"Certainly sir, here's your ticket(s)"
"Thank you"
"Have a good journey sir"
![]()

I agree with that.
However, a bigger problem is, what happens if there is no signal at the location where someone is purchasing a walk-on ticket. Then there's no means for the central database to know that the ticket that person holds is in fact valid. You could provide some means for a ticket to be marked as valid-but-not-in-the-database, but that would then open a loophole for fraudsters - somewhat destroying the point of the central database!
The system doesn't need to be 100% perfect, just better than the system we have at present. As long as passengers are given the benefit of the doubt when there is no signal, I don't see the problem. It would be very difficult for a fraudster to know for certain whether there is going to be a signal or not when his ticket is checked.
Yes, but Great Britain is six times the size of the Netherlands.
In 2016.
By 2026, I would expect only a very few tiny rural lines not to have near 100% coverage. They could be treated separately in some way, e.g. like BR Paytrains where tickets were all dealt with on board except for through tickets, which could be dealt with by collecting a "boarding card" from a connected machine at points where you enter that network.
Why is this happening?! Maybe ticket prices are too high. The highest price you pay for a First Classticket in the Netherlands is 37 Pounds.
That 'something' will consist of:But we need to do something. Agree on something that is hopefully scalable and go with it.
Yes.is there a link to the programme for catch up?
lf anyone wants to see the TV report behind this programme, it was on lnside Out South East this evening, now available on iPlayer http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b0816yxy/inside-out-south-east-31102016
However, a bigger problem is, what happens if there is no signal at the location where someone is purchasing a walk-on ticket. Then there's no means for the central database to know that the ticket that person holds is in fact valid. You could provide some means for a ticket to be marked as valid-but-not-in-the-database, but that would then open a loophole for fraudsters - somewhat destroying the point of the central database!
One difference between the UK and those three countries is that we do not operate compulsory reservations, they do on long-distances services. That rather simplifies the matter to valid on only one specific train.
What "powers of arrest" does this Mike bloke have that isn't citizens arrest?
You can have secure tickets without a wireless connection or a database.
It is possible to digitally sign the ticket barcode data using Public key cryptography. Then the reader could validate the signature and see if it came from a valid ticket machine or not. Only genuine ticket issuing machines would have the signing key.
This can be done with entirely disconnected ticket machines.
(Due to a mathematical trick you don't need the signing key to validate the signature and it remains secure even if the verification key is publicly known)
All very technically splendid. What about those who do not have a suitable device, or have one but choose not to carry it at all times, or whose device is broken, stolen or simply runs out of power?
Perhaps we can look forward to a day when we will apply, in advance of travel, to a government department, and be given permission to travel. Our movements can then be tracked and no-one will be on the train who doesn't have that movement permission for fear of the consequences. Indeed there will be no need for ticket checks because everyone on the train will be being tracked in real-time by the railway GCHQalike. Alternatively I can stroll up to the station and buy a ticket because I fell like it that morning.
For the secure barcode approach only the railway company needs equipment.
The passenger gets a paper ticket.
(I'd actually hope this is already in use for the current barcodes?)

![]()
Just because a ticket uses a barcode to scan, therefore making it much harder to fake and more reliable to use on barriers, hardly means anyone need to track you. Afterall "they" could presumably track ticket sales via credit cards even if you pay by traditional means if they really wanted to.
Using barcodes to verify tickets will allow you to print tickets at home and buy them on your phone, but won't stop traditional sales as well. An orange ticket could just have the scannable code printed on it.
You can print your postage at home for letters and parcels, but you can still buy a physical stamp too.
But, as I am a thoroughly honest citizen, I have nothing to worry about.