Earth calling
@Paul The Alien...


THC
I wouldn't say they got hammered. Well beaten, maybe even played off the park. But not a hammering. Two of their four goals were in injury time after all.
What actually happened is a credit to Howe as a manager. A team that presumably still has a lot of Howe in their DNA, went away from home, and in the words of the commentator, "Did a Newcastle to Newcastle".
Howe's team responded well to going behind, scored a great goal, but just didn't have any control at any point. Howe fronted up, said Bournemouth were the better team.
He offered only one excuse, fatigue. And to anyone who watched the game and has watched Newcastle this seaon, he's probably right. The performance was off from the get go, with multiple players not up to their usual standards.
Nothing Howe tried worked, in contrast to his usual ability to change games with a substitute or a change in formation or tactics. I personally think he needed to add another midfielder since the issue was clearly that Bournemouth were using pace to stretch the game and isolate Isak.
This meant Newcastle attacks had to cover so much ground, and it was telling that they often broke down due to tired minds and tired legs. But Howe hardly ever does that, and doing so does nullify the attacking potential of even a tired Newcastle team. Lesson learned hopefully. But there was no lack of character or fight, literally.
In the eyes of Bournemouth fans, they had their best ever performance in the Premier League, and are absolutely buzzing at having beaten one of the big clubs. So for one game they've experienced what it's been like for a Newcastle fan watching an Eddie Howe managed team.
Had Eddie won this game, it would have been a club record winning stream. He was prevented from doing so by a team that was unbeaten in 10 games.
If it becomes a pattern, if the team play that after a week off, then we can maybe start questioning the manager, since it wouldn't be the first time he works his teams too hard.