Did Steve Bruce walk out on Huddersfield years ago, or am I getting muddled up with somebody else?
He did. He very much had form for walking out on clubs in his early years of management.
Did Steve Bruce walk out on Huddersfield years ago, or am I getting muddled up with somebody else?
Did Steve Bruce walk out on Huddersfield years ago, or am I getting muddled up with somebody else?
Did Steve Bruce walk out on Huddersfield years ago, or am I getting muddled up with somebody else?
No he didn't. He was appointed in close season replacing the popular Peter Jackson because our owner at the time (Barry Rubery) wanted a "big name" manager. He was fired after a poor start to his second season in charge in October 2000.He did. He very much had form for walking out on clubs in his early years of management.
No he didn't. He was appointed in close season replacing the popular Peter Jackson because our owner at the time (Barry Rubery) wanted a "big name" manager. He was fired after a poor start to his second season in charge in October 2000.
He started really well with us, and had us in the running for promotion until the ridiculous decision by the board to sell Marcus Stewart to Ipswich Town, one of our rivals for a play-off spot. There was talk at the time that the sale was forced due to Stewart "playing away from home" with the chairman's wife, though I've no idea if this was true. Stewart went on to fire Ipswich to promotion to the Premier League, whilst Huddersfield's form collapsed and we missed out on the play-offs. The owners at the time made the bizarre decision to pay Bruce in part with shares in the club, meaning he had a conflict of interest when it came to player sales.Ah. Well it was about the only one he didn't walk out on in those early years!
He did the same even towards the end of his career, resigning from Sheffield Wednesday to take the Newcastle job in 2019.He did. He very much had form for walking out on clubs in his early years of management.
I can't imagine that shareholders were getting any sort of pay out, from transfers or anything else, so can't see how it would be a conflict of interest.The owners at the time made the bizarre decision to pay Bruce in part with shares in the club, meaning he had a conflict of interest when it came to player sales.
Perhaps not... but there were always rumours that Bruce wasn't exactly squeaky-clean in his financial dealings, particularly when it came to the Stewart sale. It was obvious that Stewart didn't want to leave, and as fans we felt Bruce should have put up more of a fight when his star player was sold to a promotion rival.I can't imagine that shareholders were getting any sort of pay out, from transfers or anything else, so can't see how it would be a conflict of interest.
Sad to hear that Marcus Stewart has been diagnosed with motor-neurone disease recently.Perhaps not... but there were always rumours that Bruce wasn't exactly squeaky-clean in his financial dealings, particularly when it came to the Stewart sale. It was obvious that Stewart didn't want to leave, and as fans we felt Bruce should have put up more of a fight when his star player was sold to a promotion rival.
Sad news indeed. However he seems to be taking the challenge head-on and using his platform to raise awareness and funds for research into this horrible disease. Hats off to him for that.Sad to hear that Marcus Stewart has been diagnosed with motor-neurone disease recently.
Indeed. Sheffield United (in second) lost 1-3 at home to (third-placed) Middlesbrough in the Championship last night and so the Blades remain eight points behind top-of-the-table Burnley, with 15 or so fixtures still to go.Sheffield United knew that tonight's match result was important, following Burnley's draw yesterday, but the script did not run to plan.
A good win for Boro - however they are too far adrift to take an automatic promotion spot. Thier upturn in from under Carrick is impressive.Indeed. Sheffield United (in second) lost 1-3 at home to (third-placed) Middlesbrough in the Championship last night and so the Blades remain eight points behind top-of-the-table Burnley, with 15 or so fixtures still to go.
A week definitely not to remember for Sheffield United as their match today away to Millwall was the Saturday early kick-off and they lost again, this time by the old goal in five.Indeed. Sheffield United (in second) lost 1-3 at home to (third-placed) Middlesbrough in the Championship last night and so the Blades remain eight points behind top-of-the-table Burnley, with 15 or so fixtures still to go.
Reading the BBC report it sounds like it's the first time a team has led 2-0 only to loss by a goal margin of 3.Not many teams in Champions League later-stage matches in their home leg take a two-goal lead early in the first half and end up losing 2-5.
Perhaps clubs shouldn't spend beyond their means?This seems to be quite a strange thread with several ongoing soccer topics which should probably be individual threads possibly in a sports/soccer subforum. However I will insert yet another topic why not... looks like the latest club to be persecuted by the EFL is: Birmingham City. Probably will be another Derby County scenario whereby the EFL is so hellbent on destroying a club that it will initially deduct 12 points, then if there is any risk of the team not being relegated, arbitrarily apply further deductions/sanctions to pull the rug from under their feet.
I know that some American sports are held here occasionally to bring their attention to the public, but I cannot recall a rodeo being held in recent times.I suspect any punishment for Birmingham City will be suspended, despite this not being their first rodeo.
Also here's an idea: the EFL applies the rules consistently rather than punishing selected clubs only. Or perhaps the EFL can't be trusted and there needs to be an "arms length" body to deal with this sort of stuff. That way the EFL can deal with actual footballing matters such as why has almost every game I've been to this season kicked off 2 minutes late and half time has been 17-19 minutes. Very poor punctuality indeed.Perhaps clubs shouldn't spend beyond their means?
If anything the Financial Fair Play rules need MORE teeth, not less.
I suspect any punishment for Birmingham City will be suspended, despite this not being their first rodeo.
I have a season ticket at a much-maligned League One club and I have observed exactly the same thing. In fact it’s been that way since 2007; we are almost always the last result to come in on the livescore services too.Also here's an idea: the EFL applies the rules consistently rather than punishing selected clubs only. Or perhaps the EFL can't be trusted and there needs to be an "arms length" body to deal with this sort of stuff. That way the EFL can deal with actual footballing matters such as why has almost every game I've been to this season kicked off 2 minutes late and half time has been 17-19 minutes. Very poor punctuality indeed.
half time has been 17-19 minutes