Well seeing as they only put it back on its frames yesterday I think it's a bit early for a shot of the finished project!
However if you google Flying Scotsman I'm sure you will find plenty of photos from before the NRM took it to pieces.
It is'nt Shaw Savill (35009) the caption said it was 35022...... but yes she certainly looks sorry for its self!![]()
You should make it your next project!
I'd love to being a massive bullied fan, but im already donating money to another loco![]()

I'll check my savings![]()
A rough estimate would be around £400,000. If you have that then crack on! If I had it I think I might be tempted with another locomotive newbuild.![]()
A rough estimate would be around £400,000. If you have that then crack on! If I had it I think I might be tempted with another locomotive newbuild.![]()
If I had 400 grand to spare, then look at an "unrebuilding" project, which can't cost all that much more.
Oh, and I'd've bought GNER off Sea Containers somehow, and you'd be seeing Garter/Marlborough blue HSTs by now.![]()
I've always wanted to see a HST in black (I know Grand Central have black HST's, but one without all the livery). Ah yes, the much discussed £4472,000,000. I'm not really into steam but respect why many are, and appreciate the engineering aspect. I admit they can be evocative and full of character. Like i said though, I'm not into them, diesel being my thing.
However if ever there was an over rated kettle, its 4472. It's like a Z list celebrity. Everyone has heard of it, but no one has a clue why its famous. I get sick of hearing about it to be honest, and I'm not impressed with the amount of tax payers money that's been lavished upon it over the years, to the detriment of other items in the National collection particularly those from a more recent era.
I would rather the money be spent on getting a really worthwhile locos sorted out, such as Mallard or the streamlined Dutchess. There's no reason why 4472 couldn't be funded by the private sector if there was a genuine demand for it. Anyway, that's my take on it.