Hello,
A Wikipedia hole recently took me to looking at Workington North and Flimby stations.
One thing that struck me was that Flimby - which if people recall, was the closest station to north Workington before the temporary Workington North station opened after the destruction of local road bridges in the 2009 floods - saw an obvious passenger spike in the immediate aftermath of the floods, but has retained a good chunk of this increase:
2008/09 6,884
2009/10 8,756
2010/11 12,770
2011/12 15,746
2012/13 14,238
2013/14 13,566
2014/15 13,028
Is this a sign that commuters who were forced onto the rail in late 2009 liked what they saw and stayed? Or is there another cause (better revenue collection perhaps)? Are there other examples of emergencies boosting long term rail use (if that's what has happened)?
A Wikipedia hole recently took me to looking at Workington North and Flimby stations.
One thing that struck me was that Flimby - which if people recall, was the closest station to north Workington before the temporary Workington North station opened after the destruction of local road bridges in the 2009 floods - saw an obvious passenger spike in the immediate aftermath of the floods, but has retained a good chunk of this increase:
2008/09 6,884
2009/10 8,756
2010/11 12,770
2011/12 15,746
2012/13 14,238
2013/14 13,566
2014/15 13,028
Is this a sign that commuters who were forced onto the rail in late 2009 liked what they saw and stayed? Or is there another cause (better revenue collection perhaps)? Are there other examples of emergencies boosting long term rail use (if that's what has happened)?