• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

First win Intercity West Coast franchise

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
9 Aug 2012
Messages
34
Tony Collins, Virgin Trains CEO said:

"We welcome the Transport Department's decision to delay the process. We hope that Ministers will also agree to our proposal that there should be an independent review of the decision to award the contract to FirstGroup.

We note the Minister's assessment of the FirstGroup bid and take strong exception to the view it is provides better value than Virgin Trains. We have submitted a strong and deliverable bid with more commitments on new trains, new routes and new on-board services. In total we have outlined £800 million of new investment compared to £350 million announced by FirstGroup."

Normally, under franchise process, the successful bidder sets out a range of 'franchise obligations' - legally binding commitments - but none has been published by FirstGroup or the Department for Transport.

The proposals that have been revealed are less beneficial to customers than Virgin's. A comparison of the two sets of proposals is shown below.

Trains / capacity
First Group: More trains on the route, with 12,000 extra seats per day provided by 11 new 6 carriage electric trains from December 2016 (in addition to the 106 extra Pendolino carriages currently being introduced) and refurbishment of the existing Pendolino and Voyager train fleets.

Virgin: We would replace all of the Voyager trains with 21 6-car 'Baby Pendolinos' which would mean no diesel operation over electrified lines, delivering the best environmental solution and an all-Pendolino fleet providing the best passenger environment. All the exiting Pendolinos would undergo a major refurbishment.

FirstGroup appears to be retaining all of the Voyager fleet but it is not clear whether this is a firm commitment or whether they have the option to redeploy them to other routes. Assuming they do retain all of the Voyagers, FirstGroup would be providing 4% more seats than Virgin would on a daily basis.

Virgin would investment £385m in the fleet. We understand there are no contracts in place for the FirstGroup proposals.

Capacity between Birmingham and Scotland
FirstGroup: More capacity on services between Birmingham and Scotland.

Virgin: We would also provide more capacity on this route, but in addition we would offer direct services from the south Midlands via Birmingham. All services between Birmingham and Scotland would be operated by either six, nine, 11, or 12-car trains.

Journey times
FirstGroup: Faster journey times between London Euston and Glasgow

Virgin: FirstGroup's proposals would involve removing some stops en route, to speed up the service. Virgin's proposals are based on track improvements to deliver the improved journey times. Working with Network Rail we would undertake a number of infrastructure upgrades including enhancement to allow the Pendolino to reach a top speed of 135mph in order to improve a number of journey times. This Virgin investment would be £125m, but there is no firm commitment in FirstGroup statements.

New destinations
First Group: New services to Blackpool, Bolton and Shrewsbury, subject to approval of the Office of Rail Regulation.

Virgin: Our Bid also proposes new direct services to Telford, Shrewsbury, Blackpool and Bolton, but they would start a year earlier than in FirstGroup's proposals. We would also double the frequency to Preston and increase calls on the North Wales route, and at Nuneaton and Milton Keynes. In addition we would create new services to Stirling, Motherwell, Hartford and Liverpool South Parkway; further enhance services for Gobowen, Chirk, Ruabon and Wrexham; increase journey opportunities between Milton Keynes/Rugby/Stafford and the North West; and increase calls at Tamworth and Lichfield.

Fares
First Group: Lower Standard Anytime fares over the first two years.

Virgin comment: The lowering of the standard fare which makes up around 20% of annual revenue still results in FirstGroup increasing fares in real terms by 22% and at the same time they plan a massive growth in passengers to around 66m per annum by 2026, creating a major overcrowding problem.

Station improvements
FirstGroup: £22m in station improvements.

Virgin: Our investment for stations totals £99m. Like FirstGroup we would install ticket gates and undertake a number of station improvement projects. We would also create more car parking, install more ticket machines and introduce smart cards. CCTV and information points would also be installed.

Ticketing / passenger services
FirstGroup: Oyster-style smart ticketing.

Virgin: We would design and develop a revolutionary new Centralised Booking Engine (CBE) which is unique to the industry. It would pull together all of the many industry systems and provide the passenger with a one stop shop experience. As part of this we would introduce a new customer experience system which includes a loyalty scheme in partnership with a major scheme provider. The investment in this area is £39m; there is no detail in this area from FirstGroup.

Customer satisfaction
FirstGroup: For the first time in an intercity franchise, better customer satisfaction as measured by the National Passenger Survey.

Virgin: We currently score the highest rating for all long-distance franchise operators (91%). Our plans would seek to increase this rating by building on the fantastic service our people provide backed by an investment programme which is more than twice that promised by FirstGroup.

Onboard service
Virgin: Virgin would replace the current Wi-Fi system with a completely new state-of-the-art system capable of growing with passenger needs, as enhancing the current system is not feasible.

There would be a complete refresh of the onboard offer. This would support the enhanced at-seat complimentary service in First Class and a new at-seat service for Standard. The Virgin investment in the onboard service is £109m, but there are no details as yet from FirstGroup.

Investment
FirstGroup: FirstGroup has said its investment package is worth £350m but there is little detail of how this is to be spent. To help customers and politicians understand the FirstGroup proposals, Virgin Rail Group has put 10 questions to Mr O'Toole, based on his recent comments to analysts and MPs.

Virgin: We are planning to invest nearly £800m in the franchise, including a number of other projects not listed above.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

bnsf734

Member
Joined
15 Oct 2007
Messages
649
Location
Nuneaton
I've just read this Virgin release and noted the part about Virgin adding 21 baby pendolino trains. As these will replace the existing Voyager trains (of which there are currently 20) This is a net increase of only 1 train, yet the first impression of the release reads of 21 new trains....

Also I wonder how Virgin plan to get to the various places off the overhead wires after they have returned the diesel units - are they planning to drag the pendos?

I also note the part about increasing services from Nuneaton & other Trent Valley stations, Virgin have had every opportunity to do this since the VHF timetable was introduced but have chosen not to, despite lobbying from Councils and local passenger groups. Funny how this is now in the plans for the new franchise - would it have been in there had First not already proposed it?
 

SkinnyDave

Established Member
Joined
11 Mar 2012
Messages
1,242
Railnews.co.uk has an article detailing both bids.

I would be interested in seeing SNCF Abellio bids

It looks on the face of it that Virgin would be investing more into the service itself than First and the premium comparison is quite interesting
 

The Ham

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Jul 2012
Messages
12,036
Railnews.co.uk has an article detailing both bids.

I would be interested in seeing SNCF Abellio bids

It looks on the face of it that Virgin would be investing more into the service itself than First and the premium comparison is quite interesting

here's the direct link:
http://www.railnews.co.uk/content/documents/west coast spread medium res.pdf
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I've just read this Virgin release and noted the part about Virgin adding 21 baby pendolino trains. As these will replace the existing Voyager trains (of which there are currently 20) This is a net increase of only 1 train, yet the first impression of the release reads of 21 new trains....

Also I wonder how Virgin plan to get to the various places off the overhead wires after they have returned the diesel units - are they planning to drag the pendos?

Although not necessarily additional trains for WCIC it does release 20 Voyager's to be used elsewhere on the network, as it is unlikely that they will be scrapped given they are still newer than other rolling stock out there.

In the link to the railnews story above they confirm that they are to be dragged or pushed by a loco controlled from the leading end of the train.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,925
Location
UK
I've just read this Virgin release and noted the part about Virgin adding 21 baby pendolino trains. As these will replace the existing Voyager trains (of which there are currently 20) This is a net increase of only 1 train, yet the first impression of the release reads of 21 new trains....

It's all spin. First will be adding new trains AND keeping the Voyagers. Virgin is actually getting RID of trains (First is getting rid of none) but if you read what Virgin has written, it's definitely going to make the supporters believe First will leave people far worse off.

Virgin is being VERY clever in its wording - and I am sure they spent some considerable time creating the release and making sure it remains factually correct, but still misleads people who can't, or won't, read between the lines. Seriously, SRB should get into politics - he's turning into Tony Blair!

Rather like TheTrainline.Com saying you can save an average of 43% on train tickets, without making it clear that you can do that wherever you buy tickets from - it's not 43% off the actual ticket price, but telling you there are cheaper tickets.

That would be like me saying I can save you money on your walk-up train ticket tomorrow, by telling you to wait until 0930/1000 and buying an off-peak ticket instead of peak. Bam - you've saved money, but I didn't offer any discount.

Then, by not mentioning the booking fee, the company fails to make it clear that in 100% of cases you'll pay more buying a ticket there than a range of other online ticket sellers, or just buying at the train station.

Who is behind the Trainline by the way?!
 

F Great Eastern

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2009
Messages
3,851
Location
UK
Out of curiosity, how much money will returning the voyagers off lease save Virgin

Also do we have figures for profit margins for the two TOC's?
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
Last edited:

All Line Rover

Established Member
Joined
17 Feb 2011
Messages
5,270
I am very cynical of Virgin's press releases. As far as I'm concerned, all of these "we'd do x, y and z" claims are far-fetched and over-optimistic in a last-minute attempt to trump First.

As other's have already said, Virgin have had numerous opportunity over the years to add additional calls at stations such as Lichfield, Nuneaton and Milton Keynes, but have consistently refused. They seem to prefer faster end-to-end journey times with lower overall capacity utilisation (which obviously results from fewer stops) instead of a London-Midland-esque stopping service. It's a logical decision, really, as it suits their image of "fast," "glamorous," "fun."

The Voyagers work fine and generally seem to be more reliable than the Pendolinos. I am concerned that loco-hauled Pendolinos replacing Voyagers might negatively affect PPM. Also, where will all the extra stock come from to run the new services Virgin propose? (Including services from Chirk - is this a joke!?)

I don't for a minute believe that 135mph running is possible! It would be lovely, but is completely unrealistic bearing in mind past experience of the WCML upgrade. Would Virgin's £120m-ish investment would even cover the planning stages? :lol:

Also, has anyone noticed the fact that Virgin have kept suspiciously quiet about the Railcard easement? First have publicly stated that it will stay (for one fares round, at least). Virgin have not.

First want to keep The Shop (good news!). They want to introduce a middle class (which I hope they call "Standard Premium," not the awful "Club Class") but apparently on Pendolinos only, so Coach D might stay on the Voyagers for the next few years (good news!). If this middle class offers catering they will have to enhance catering in First Class (good news!). They are introducing a new loyalty scheme for which a wider variety of passengers will be eligible (good news!). And last but not least, they are planning to introduce an "effective yield management" system - something which Virgin have failed miserably on since VHF, with some trains packed and some trains almost empty. That's very good news!

I suspect First will heavily restrict walk-up fares, though - especially on the Birmingham to Scotland route and stations beyond Chester and Preston to/from London. That's bad news!
 
Joined
9 Feb 2009
Messages
807
As other's have already said, Virgin have had numerous opportunity over the years to add additional calls at stations such as Lichfield, Nuneaton and Milton Keynes, but have consistently refused. They seem to prefer faster end-to-end journey times with lower overall capacity utilisation (which obviously results from fewer stops) instead of a London-Midland-esque stopping service. It's a logical decision, really, as it suits their image of "fast," "glamorous," "fun."

Had Virgin put more stops in they would have been in breach of their franchise and possibly been stripped of it. In the first bid for the LM 110 mph service, a VT service needed to be moved by 3 minutes but 2 minutes was the maximum allowed by the DfT - LM needed both VT & DfT approval - hence why they went back to the drawing board with a new bid...
 

Lampshade

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2009
Messages
3,778
Location
South London
Fares
First Group: Lower Standard Anytime fares over the first two years.

Virgin comment: The lowering of the standard fare which makes up around 20% of annual revenue still results in FirstGroup increasing fares in real terms by 22% and at the same time they plan a massive growth in passengers to around 66m per annum by 2026, creating a major overcrowding problem.

So in other words Virgin won't be reducing the fares at all, meaning the fares will increase even MORE in 'real terms' :roll:
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
No their doing it through a new £22m booking engine that varies price by demand rather than just sells a preset number of advance tickets at each price tier.
 

All Line Rover

Established Member
Joined
17 Feb 2011
Messages
5,270
No their doing it through a new £22m booking engine that varies price by demand rather than just sells a preset number of advance tickets at each price tier.

I'm hoping it will work by having a pre-set number of Advance fare levels at different prices (like now) but with the quota varying according to demand, rather than a varying quota and varying prices. If the system is designed according to the latter, advance purchase fares will get extremely confusing!
 

MidnightFlyer

Veteran Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
12,856
Hmm, Virgin are pledging £99,000,000 in stations, many of which are looking increasingly run-down and forlorn; with new improvements programmes, car parks and ticket retailing opportunities. I mean, it's not like they've had 15 years to sort any of that out is it?! :roll:
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,925
Location
UK
Virgin seems to be adopting Labour Party policy. You can say anything when you're no longer in charge. It doesn't matter if you were in power/control for years and didn't do any of it then.

I am surprised Virgin hasn't claimed it would have funded HS2 if it had won. Maybe that's to come?
 
Last edited:

Realfish

Member
Joined
15 Aug 2012
Messages
272
Virgin seems to be adopting Labour Party policy. You can say anything when you're no longer in charge. It doesn't matter if you were in power/control for years and didn't do any of it then.

I am surprised Virgin hasn't claimed it would have funded HS2 if it had won. Maybe that's to come?

But surely Virgin are telling us what is in the bid documents submitted to Dft, which would have become contractural had they won. For that reason it can't be an attempt to trump First, as suggested by some others.
 

Wath Yard

Member
Joined
31 Dec 2011
Messages
864
I don't know the contents of the bids or the truth in Virgin's claims, however by now they will have worked out the DfT and FirstGroup aren't going to get into a #####ing contest, so if they are working on the assumption their legal bid will fail, they can say pretty much what they want. The press aren't going to challenge them on their claims and the chances are we will never know for sure, or by the time the full details are released 99% of the people who are currently getting excited about it will have completely forgotten about the subject.
 

ANorthernGuard

Established Member
Joined
8 Oct 2010
Messages
2,662
Virgin seems to be adopting Labour Party policy. You can say anything when you're no longer in charge. It doesn't matter if you were in power/control for years and didn't do any of it then.

I am surprised Virgin hasn't claimed it would have funded HS2 if it had won. Maybe that's to come?

well it worked for the ConDems lol. all parties speak a load of trash whether in opposition or in government, the only difference for me is I hate the Tory scum who hatethe working classes and are only in it for the well off and rich with a vengeance...apart from that they are Ok lol
 

MidnightFlyer

Veteran Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
12,856
I love the illusion that people are under whereby they believe that all Tories hate the working class...
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,455
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
I love the illusion that people are under whereby they believe that all Tories hate the working class...

Perhaps the more right-wing the Conservative leadership of any British Government becomes, this particular impression seems to resonate more and the views of right-wing oriented "think-tanks" suddenly seem to have a more authoritative viewpoint within that party. It is at times such as this that the likes of John Redwood seem to make more pronouncements that reflect their own personal political ideology.
 

Masbroughlad

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2011
Messages
1,847
Location
Midlands
I love the illusion that people are under whereby they believe that all Tories hate the working class...

Well this shower certainly aren't helping Joe Public, particularly working class Joe! If you have money - you are OK. This Government seem to think anyone who claims benefit is a slacker - at least that's what they portray!!

Anyway, back to the thread - will the change of Transport Minister have any effect on the franchise decision making process. Is he pro or against railway?
 

RPI

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2010
Messages
3,359
Im sure part of the overall huge investment figure quoted by VT actually includes the new trains that they plane to replace the Voyagers with! So basically FG will increase capacity by 11 trains overall and VT will increase by a huge massive figure of.....1 train!
 

SprinterMan

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2010
Messages
2,341
Location
Hertford
This is a look at things from a different angle, but what if the whole thing is an inside job. By Abellio. All they had to do was spread "rumors" to the higher-ups at First and Virgin about what the other would be bidding, making sure both would bid stupidly high amounts, with First bidding more. Knowing what a drama queen SRB is, Abellio knew he would not go down without a fight, hence the inquiry has started. This government inquiry will find both bids undeliverable and give the franchise to Abellio, because of the British Government's historical mistrust of the French. Now, why would Abellio do this, you may ask. Well, the Ipswich-Lowestoft line is going hourly from December, and GA is desperately short of DMUs as it is, so Abellio are looking at the currently out of use 221144 and licking their lips. Sure it can't run without a compressor, but it can run when a 57/3 is providing air for it, which would explain why 57309 is currently lurking in Norwich carriage sidings.....

Just a theory..... :P
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top