35 of them on there wayI see LTO2NWC is still out, on 61 yesterday.
Im sure I seen something saying they have electric buses on order for FIG. Cant remember where I seen it.
22 it is. I believe they are for the 9 service.35 of them on there way
22 it is. I believe they are for the 9 service.
The press release cited 41 across Scotland with 35 to be built by ADL https://www.electrive.com/2020/09/26/scotland-awards-7-4-million-for-electric-buses/
I'd suggest that 22 for First rather than 35 is more like it, given that it would only leave 6 vehicles to be split between four other parties!!!
What better way to start Clean Air Day 2020 than announce that we have 22 new electric vehicles joining our fleet! This has been made possible thanks to Transport Scotland's new funding programme, the Scottish Ultra Low Emission Bus Scheme which will help pay some of the costs of purchasing 22 new fully electric buses. Read the full announcement here
Would that make sense then would 22 buses be needed for the 9?
Do we reckon that the current frequency will remain or will be cut back?
Overheard a few drivers say services have been quiet.
wonder what will happen to the current buses branded for the 9/9A personally I think new buses should be given to the 60/60A as they're busy and still get old recks
just because its got older B7s and B9s doesnt mean it deserves new buses. its allocation is in much better condition than the 9/9A aswell as that you can cut the PVR of the 9 replacing singles with doubles therefore saving running costspersonally I think new buses should be given to the 60/60A as they're busy and still get old recks
just because its got older B7s and B9s doesnt mean it deserves new buses. its allocation is in much better condition than the 9/9A aswell as that you can cut the PVR of the 9 replacing singles with doubles therefore saving running costs
I'd much rather take the bus than train its a more enjoyable experience and it takes you closer to where you're going most the time
I'd much rather take the bus than train its a more enjoyable experience and it takes you closer to where you're going most the time
For many residents around Garscadden and Yoker the railway station is by far closer than the nearest bus stop, especially Garscadden where the station is literally at the bottom of the garden for some! The improvements to the rail network over the past decade have undoubtedly had an impact on bus passenger numbers in Glasgow and will continue to do so. Pre Covid the Glasgow rail network was getting to the stage where it was going to be difficult to accommodate further growth and identifying where this was going to occur would have been a key growth opportunity for First Glasgow. Obviously the situation is a little different at the moment.Definitely agree with this. Some train stations are useless for most of the area. With the exception of Scotstounhill all of my closest stations(Garscadden, Drumchapel, Jordanhill and Yoker) are definitely not greatly positioned for residents of the area
Yes, the bus will get you closer.
Railway stations are better to wait though, at night vs a bus stop next to a road which may not have a shelter.
Drumchapel station is on the Old Side of Drumchapel, the side of the Drum I am living near is closer to Drumry station.Definitely agree with this. Some train stations are useless for most of the area. With the exception of Scotstounhill all of my closest stations(Garscadden, Drumchapel, Jordanhill and Yoker) are definitely not greatly positioned for residents of the area
Drumchapel station is on the Old Side of Drumchapel, the side of the Drum I am living near is closer to Drumry station.
The 16 failed because it was a long route and it was every 30 or 20 minutes.Yeah Drumchapel is massive lol. Surprised the 60/M60 have always been reasonably busy at that end when I've used them with how handy Drumry station would be even just to go to Singer. Drumchapel overall is pretty solid bus territory.
Obviously the 16 was a bit of a fail but the 3 and 6A both being every 10 mins definitely didn't help that
The 16 failed because it was a long route and it was every 30 or 20 minutes.
I disagree. The 8 and 16 provide links to the hospital that the 77 doesn't. Cutting them back to Partick would cause a stream of complaints and probably loose First passengers doing even worse for those routes in the long term. I don't think their frequencies are much of an issue either, they're typical of that sort of route, not every route needs to be high frequency with buses every 10 minutes.