mattb7tl
Member
Given the recent discussion on the EP+ thread, I believe this topic offers an excellent opportunity for conversation.
Within that thread, we delved into the baffling timetables from FirstBus, which have raised concerns due to the elimination of evening and night journeys. These changes affect networks and routes that, not only being remarkably popular (and usually have bus priority measures), are also considered the most profitable in West Yorkshire (check attached image).
This situation underscores that the issue doesn't revolve around profits or ridership alone, but rather stems from an ideological standpoint. The peculiar attitude towards evening and night journeys appears prevalent in virtually all of FirstBus's operations, spanning from areas like the Potteries to densely populated urban regions like Bradford.
This stark contrast becomes evident when you compare FirstBus to other top five bus companies, which are also often deemed as profit-driven. These companies, to some extent, grasp the significance of subsidizing journeys from their own profits, even when journeys operate with minimal or no patronage.
First networks, however, have taken a different approach, even on core, heavily-traveled bus routes, evening and night journeys have been stripped away to the extent that these routes no longer serve a social purpose. Common standard timetables now seem confined to operating from 6 am to 6 pm or 8 pm, vs other companies which usually have their popular core services running from 5am to 10 or 11pm
Would love to hear your thoughts on this issue. I am quite fixated and intrigued by these strange decisions. It makes me wonder whether any area that adopts franchising with first as the main operator will see frequencies rise and have mass amounts of layer journeys introduced with little to no cost to the taxpayer, similar to what we saw at Midland Bluebird.
Within that thread, we delved into the baffling timetables from FirstBus, which have raised concerns due to the elimination of evening and night journeys. These changes affect networks and routes that, not only being remarkably popular (and usually have bus priority measures), are also considered the most profitable in West Yorkshire (check attached image).
This situation underscores that the issue doesn't revolve around profits or ridership alone, but rather stems from an ideological standpoint. The peculiar attitude towards evening and night journeys appears prevalent in virtually all of FirstBus's operations, spanning from areas like the Potteries to densely populated urban regions like Bradford.
This stark contrast becomes evident when you compare FirstBus to other top five bus companies, which are also often deemed as profit-driven. These companies, to some extent, grasp the significance of subsidizing journeys from their own profits, even when journeys operate with minimal or no patronage.
First networks, however, have taken a different approach, even on core, heavily-traveled bus routes, evening and night journeys have been stripped away to the extent that these routes no longer serve a social purpose. Common standard timetables now seem confined to operating from 6 am to 6 pm or 8 pm, vs other companies which usually have their popular core services running from 5am to 10 or 11pm
Would love to hear your thoughts on this issue. I am quite fixated and intrigued by these strange decisions. It makes me wonder whether any area that adopts franchising with first as the main operator will see frequencies rise and have mass amounts of layer journeys introduced with little to no cost to the taxpayer, similar to what we saw at Midland Bluebird.
Attachments
Last edited by a moderator:
