FGW forum piccy thingy

[Techniquest]

Why has 43088 (on the FGW piccy thing at the top of the page) been replaced by a rancid shot of a 180?!

Who on Earth would choose such a thing as a picture for this forum? It's far too imposing on the page and I can't stand it.

PLEASE bring back the shot of 43088.

 

[Ascot]

Why not a GNER (NXEC) one?

 

[Techniquest]

I'm a FGW basher, not GNER/NXEC!

Besides, the shot of 43088 was much nicer than any of the others on here, hence why I used it!

 

[me123]

There's lots of FGW HSTs down there; I like the 180! (Which I dodn't know existed )

 

[matt]

Just change the style using the menu at the bottom of the page and select the First Great Western HST style

 

[class 313]

Why has 43088 (on the FGW piccy thing at the top of the page) been replaced by a rancid shot of a 180?!

Who on Earth would choose such a thing as a picture for this forum? It's far too imposing on the page and I can't stand it.

Excuse me. I took that photo.

 

[Techniquest]

Ah! Better! Proper traction now!

 

[Jordy]

As per a new policy, off topic discussion has been moved to the chat forum.

 

[Techniquest]

Excuse me. I took that photo.

I daresay the full size photo looks better, but it's super-imposing in the edit of it for this forum.

 

[Jordy]

Remember they look different in different resolutions

http://www.railforums.co.uk/images/custlogo/180paddnight.jpg

 

[AlexS]

I reckon the Adelante shot is pretty canny actually.

The railways aren't just about what's on the sharp end of the train ya know! I personally reckon we should have a picture of the signal gantry at Barnetby!