bakerstreet
Member
To balance out some other quite disturbing stories about how RPIs on FCC can behave, a story from today which gave me hope.
There was a ticket check on the train I was travelling on and the gentleman sat in front of me did not have a valid ticket.
He was a bit tipsy, appeared quite unkempt - in fact exactly the type of look sadly even the best of us may pre-judge in other areas of life.
He mumbled to the RPI something about missing his stop.
His ticket was from Leagrave to St Albans (a southbound journey), but we were on a train from London going northbound, in travelcard zone 2.
The RPI took his ticket, checked what time the ticket had been printed in Leagrave (about an hour before the ticket check) and agreed that his story checked out. The RPI checking that the passenger had caught a fast train, fallen asleep (it was only 3pm!!!) and was now on his way back (some 40 or so extra miles travelled)
Even though the passenger had committed a strict liability offence, the RPI acted in my opinion with logic and common sense.
Hopefully these are the majority, but from the stories we read on here not necessarily always that common on FCC.
Thought it was worth balancing things up. Hopefully if I am in a similar position one day I will meet these RPIs and not some of the others!
There was a ticket check on the train I was travelling on and the gentleman sat in front of me did not have a valid ticket.
He was a bit tipsy, appeared quite unkempt - in fact exactly the type of look sadly even the best of us may pre-judge in other areas of life.
He mumbled to the RPI something about missing his stop.
His ticket was from Leagrave to St Albans (a southbound journey), but we were on a train from London going northbound, in travelcard zone 2.
The RPI took his ticket, checked what time the ticket had been printed in Leagrave (about an hour before the ticket check) and agreed that his story checked out. The RPI checking that the passenger had caught a fast train, fallen asleep (it was only 3pm!!!) and was now on his way back (some 40 or so extra miles travelled)
Even though the passenger had committed a strict liability offence, the RPI acted in my opinion with logic and common sense.
Hopefully these are the majority, but from the stories we read on here not necessarily always that common on FCC.
Thought it was worth balancing things up. Hopefully if I am in a similar position one day I will meet these RPIs and not some of the others!