• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Fare Payment - How does it get distributed?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
7 Aug 2025
Messages
351
Location
Portsmouth
Strange question, but wondered what happens. When I pay for my ticket, who does the money go to? Especially when the the station might be run by company x, and the train company y? (Admittedly with the coming of GBR, this is probably going to be irrelevant soon!) - I'm talking here with regards to ticket machines.

For instance, living in Portsmouth, couple of examples.

Example 1: I want to go to Chichester. This would be a Southern Service, but the Station is a SW.

Example 2: Now this is where (for me) it gets more complicated. I want to go to Southampton. I could get a Great Western train to Southampton. Or, get the SW Service. Or, to muddle things further, I might get SW to Fareham, then change to get a Southern service. Ticket isn't operator specific, so wouldn't know what train I got.

Thanks! :)
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

CyrusWuff

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2013
Messages
5,427
Location
London
In layman's terms, the retailer gets paid commission (up to 9%, though only 2% for season tickets) and the remainder is distributed amongst the train companies that are entitled to a share of it.

The exact split will vary, but is essentially linked to capacity.
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
10,076
Location
Wilmslow
It’s the reason that obviously sensible restrictions such as pick up/set down restrictions for long distance trains at Stockport, for example, have disappeared so that Avanti and Cross Country and TfW can each claim a proportion of the fares paid for Manchester-Stockport journeys.
The railway operating companies “game” the system to extract as much money as possible. It’s all a bit silly.
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,479
In layman's terms, the retailer gets paid commission (up to 9%, though only 2% for season tickets) and the remainder is distributed amongst the train companies that are entitled to a share of it.

The exact split will vary, but is essentially linked to capacity.
And if the ticket has been booked online and is collected the TVM or ticket office operator receives a fee for issuing the ticket.
 

pokemonsuper9

Established Member
Joined
20 Dec 2022
Messages
4,584
Location
Greater Manchester
long distance trains at Stockport, for example, have disappeared so that Avanti and Cross Country and TfW can each claim a proportion of the fares paid for Manchester-Stockport journeys
And presumably, also for the GM rail ranger, and other ranger tickets within Manchester, although I can't imagine the portions are too large.
 
Joined
7 Aug 2025
Messages
351
Location
Portsmouth
There's a system called ORCATs that decides how to distribute the revenue. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ORCATS

Somebody else will have to give more details though!

In layman's terms, the retailer gets paid commission (up to 9%, though only 2% for season tickets) and the remainder is distributed amongst the train companies that are entitled to a share of it.

The exact split will vary, but is essentially linked to capacity.

Thanks!
 

TUC

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2010
Messages
5,021
It’s the reason that obviously sensible restrictions such as pick up/set down restrictions for long distance trains at Stockport, for example, have disappeared so that Avanti and Cross Country and TfW can each claim a proportion of the fares paid for Manchester-Stockport journeys.
The railway operating companies “game” the system to extract as much money as possible. It’s all a bit silly.
You say that, but precisely the opposite approach and rationale has been taken by LNER at Stevensge.
 

sprunt

Established Member
Joined
22 Jul 2017
Messages
1,624
It’s the reason that obviously sensible restrictions such as pick up/set down restrictions for long distance trains at Stockport, for example, have disappeared so that Avanti and Cross Country and TfW can each claim a proportion of the fares paid for Manchester-Stockport journeys.
The railway operating companies “game” the system to extract as much money as possible. It’s all a bit silly.
Doesn't the fare money all go to the DfT now, with the TOCs just getting a fee for running the trains? If so, what's the incentive to do stuff like this? Do they get a potential bonus dependant on how much of hte fare income is routed through them?
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,479
If so, what's the incentive to do stuff like this?
It's more that they are doing such things because they pre-date CoVid and the DfT/Treasury taking control of the finances. Largely a case of 'carry on as you were'.
 

Fawkes Cat

Established Member
Joined
8 May 2017
Messages
5,246
It's more that they are doing such things because they pre-date CoVid and the DfT/Treasury taking control of the finances. Largely a case of 'carry on as you were'.
Has there been any evidence post-COVID of any new attempts to maximise the share of revenue going to a particular TOC? In other words, is it now a historic hangover, or a live current issue?
 

Hadders

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
27 Apr 2011
Messages
18,096
Doesn't the fare money all go to the DfT now, with the TOCs just getting a fee for running the trains? If so, what's the incentive to do stuff like this? Do they get a potential bonus dependant on how much of hte fare income is routed through them?
Individual TOCs still have budgets and revenue targets to meet. The fee they get to run the service is dependent on targets being met.

Similar to a supermarket. The manager of my local Sainsbury’s has their own sales targets and costs budget to meet, even though the money all goes to a ‘Sainsbury’s central pot’.
 

Sonic1234

Member
Joined
25 Apr 2021
Messages
785
Location
Croydon
Does anyone know if Oyster goes through the same ORCATS system or is a different system used for this?
 

Mattplans

Member
Joined
27 Sep 2024
Messages
695
Location
London, UK
If I board the once-a-day direct Southeastern service from Sidcup to London Blackfriars, does TL receive any revenue?

Usually to do this journey I would need to change somewhere for a Thameslink train to Blackfriars.
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,479
If I board the once-a-day direct Southeastern service from Sidcup to London Blackfriars, does TL receive any revenue?
The distribution is based on the ticket, not the journey, so Thameslink probably does receive revenue.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,227
Doesn't the fare money all go to the DfT now, with the TOCs just getting a fee for running the trains? If so, what's the incentive to do stuff like this? Do they get a potential bonus dependant on how much of hte fare income is routed through them?
ORCATS was a BR thing, so clearly it was thought necessary to allocate fares to particular routes and services long before privatisation, and I think most recent discussions here have come to the conclusion that the same purpose will still exist after nationalisation.
 

Sonic1234

Member
Joined
25 Apr 2021
Messages
785
Location
Croydon
If I board the once-a-day direct Southeastern service from Sidcup to London Blackfriars, does TL receive any revenue?
I'd imagine TL would receive most of the revenue, as most of the time that journey would involve them. On the other hand, SE would receive a small percentage from everyone else doing that journey because of the small probability they used that service.

If you're using Oyster, it relies on default routes set in the system or if you have passed through gates/pink readers, it doesn't work out exactly the service you used (that's why sometimes you can travel through extra zones and not pay for them).
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,401
Location
Northampton
ORCATS was a BR thing, so clearly it was thought necessary to allocate fares to particular routes and services long before privatisation, and I think most recent discussions here have come to the conclusion that the same purpose will still exist after nationalisation.
Indeed. The DfT & GBR will still want to know how the revenue breaks down across services and routes. What might reduce is the ORCATS 'raids' with stops or individual services being run to get TOCs 'on the board' for the ORCATs split.

Similar thing with delay attribution, but that's had enough threads.
 

Lewisham2221

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2005
Messages
2,750
Location
Staffordshire
It’s the reason that obviously sensible restrictions such as pick up/set down restrictions for long distance trains at Stockport, for example, have disappeared so that Avanti and Cross Country and TfW can each claim a proportion of the fares paid for Manchester-Stockport journeys.
The railway operating companies “game” the system to extract as much money as possible. It’s all a bit silly.
On the subject of MAN-SPT in particular, I'm really not sure that Northern services alone would have anywhere near sufficient capacity if you prevented people making Manchester to Stockport (and vice versa) journeys on the other TOCs.
 

SargeNpton

Established Member
Joined
19 Nov 2018
Messages
1,704
There's a system called ORCATs that decides how to distribute the revenue. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ORCATS

Somebody else will have to give more details though!
ORCATS takes a snapshot of each timetable period, and the fares available, and then determines the share of each ticket flow that should go to each operator (or third-party in the case of through tickets).

The actual system that distributes the revenue is called LENNON (Latest Earning Networked Nationally Overnight).
 
Joined
21 May 2014
Messages
959
I believe there's another related system called MCCARTNEY

Monetary Control Centre Allocating Railway Tariffs Nationally (Excluding Yorkshire)

(With thanks to Google Gemini for finessing this for me, I was almost there, but needed that last little push...)
 

pdeaves

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2014
Messages
5,932
Location
Gateway to the South West
Doesn't the fare money all go to the DfT now, with the TOCs just getting a fee for running the trains? If so, what's the incentive to do stuff like this?
Incentive or not, revenue to open access and other non-DfT companies (e.g. London Overground, TfW) needs to be allocated appropriately.
 

sprunt

Established Member
Joined
22 Jul 2017
Messages
1,624
Incentive or not, revenue to open access and other non-DfT companies (e.g. London Overground, TfW) needs to be allocated appropriately.
True, but I don't think whether the money goes to DfT or TfW would bother Avanti in the absence of an incentive.
 

OscarH

Established Member
Joined
15 Sep 2020
Messages
1,258
Location
Crawley
I believe there's another related system called MCCARTNEY

Monetary Control Centre Allocating Railway Tariffs Nationally (Excluding Yorkshire)

(With thanks to Google Gemini for finessing this for me, I was almost there, but needed that last little push...)
Worrying this was almost believable for a minute :D
 

Trainman40083

Established Member
Joined
29 Jan 2024
Messages
4,520
Location
Derby
You can see how a specific advance fare, sold by a TOC for a journey where there are multiple operators can actually give a TOC a greater financial share.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top