Extend Reading terminators to Old Oak Common (maybe even Paddington) via Heathrow
I have read the thread. I just thought I would throw it in.
No, that’s an incorrect assumption, they can’t use the same path in the other alternate hours, it is reserved for freight paths. This is well documented in the original track access application and then subsequent route studies. It needs additional new infrastructure, eg more freight loops, to run a 2 tph XC service through Basingstoke all day.If XC did get enough stock then it would be better to extend the Reading terminators to Southampton as this happens every other hour anyway so you could use the same path in the alternative hour.
From a selfish perspective, Windermere to Weymouth via the WCML, Reading and Bournemouth would be a good one. You could also start it at Blackpool and call it at Poulton, Kirkham and Cottam (after opening) instead of Kendal, Oxenholme and Lancaster. For a (somewhat) more sensible idea though, Scotland to Weymouth.
Connecting the WCML to further north in Scotland is one that I'd also like to see. While it isn't the end of the world to change in Glasgow/Edinburgh, it'd be nice to see a few services and improve accessibility.
Why have you removed the existing Southampton extensions? Not as if they are running around empty.
But you only have one service beyond Reading - there are two in alternate hours now.They are there!!!
But you only have one service beyond Reading - there are two in alternate hours now.
I can't open the image.
But you only have one service beyond Reading - there are two in alternate hours now.
The problem with these XC threads is they just decending into lists of places that once had one or two long distance through through trains a day to somewhere far-flung, so therefore must have them again every hour, apparently.
Suggestions need to come with an evidenced justifucation of why that is a good use of capacity and resources (at the inevitable expense of something else) that is not already fulfilled by existing connectional opportunities.
Newcastle Services shouldn’t be dropped as they are quite popular.
Post HS2 it will be difficult to keep them.
Bradford Interchange - Halifax - Preston - Lancaster - Oxenholme Lake District - Penrith - Carlisle - Carstairs - Glasgow Central. How about that?Bradford was one of many suggestions for CrossCountry by Stakeholders. I would say the best way would be to provide a Bradford Interchange-Barnsley-Sheffield-Chesterfield-Derby-Birmingham New Street
Bradford Interchange - Halifax - Preston - Lancaster - Oxenholme Lake District - Penrith - Carlisle - Carstairs - Glasgow Central. How about that?
Bradford Interchange - Halifax - Preston - Lancaster - Oxenholme Lake District - Penrith - Carlisle - Carstairs - Glasgow Central. How about that?
The former probably.TransPennine/Northern Connect more like.
The former probably.
I have another one: Hull - Leeds - York - Darlington - Durham - Newcastle - Edinburgh - Perth - Dundee - Aberdeen - Inverness