matchmaker
Established Member
A 156 on a hot day with the windows open is a very noisy train for the passengers to sit on. A 158 with the air conditioning working properly is a much nicer experience.
You see the flaw in your post?
A 156 on a hot day with the windows open is a very noisy train for the passengers to sit on. A 158 with the air conditioning working properly is a much nicer experience.
A 156 on a hot day with the windows open is a very noisy train for the passengers to sit on. A 158 with the air conditioning working properly is a much nicer experience.
You see the flaw in your post?![]()
There is supposed to be a new solution being implemented for that on the 158s. Apparently the problem isn't the system itself, it's the fact that they use a system designed to use CFC gases but aren't allowed to use CFC gases any more.
There have been a couple. The FGW a year or so back (?) was on the back of a 158 and booked to be detached en-route. For whatever reason it wasn't and carried through to Portsmouth without incident, until the driver changed ends and realised it wasn't passed...
One ended up back on a lorry from Fratton on one occasion, not sure if that got there and broke or was decided too much effort to rail it back.
Does it happen on the northern york to Blackpool north line?
Do the EMT 158's manage to reach 90 between Sheffield and Alfreton? They seem to do whenever I travel on them.Also Between Longton and Stoke 158 seem to go fast.
Sent from my brothers kindle fire
I remember a 156 (or 155) shortly after introduction doing about 90 on a test run between Leeds and York. Unfortunately I can't remember any more details. This would indicate that they should not be damaged if dragged by a 158 at that speed.
I have a video that is uploading onto youtube that I recorded specifically recorded for this thread. It shows me on a 158 between Leeds and Skipton and it seems to be going about 90. Once it had finished uploading I will post it here.
The maximum speed of the train should not exceed the maximum speed of the vehicle with the lowest maximum speed, i.e. 158 + 150 comnbo not to exceed 75 mph.But if they're being dragged, rather than running under their own motive power, you're expecting the traction in a 2-car 158 to haul 4 vehicles instead of two. That's not likely to do the acceleration any favours!
The maximum speed of the train should not exceed the maximum speed of the vehicle with the lowest maximum speed, i.e. 158 + 150 comnbo not to exceed 75 mph.
But if they're being dragged, rather than running under their own motive power, you're expecting the traction in a 2-car 158 to haul 4 vehicles instead of two. That's not likely to do the acceleration any favours!
It'll just keep the engine working harder until it gives up - a 158 wouldn't haul a dead 156 at anywhere near 90 mph.
The interesting one was apparently a 153 being dragged by a 170 across the country during the Central Trains era - that apparently required an entirely new engine by the time it arrived in Birmingham. Same cause - driver forgot the 153 was on the back.
The maximum speed of the train should not exceed the maximum speed of the vehicle with the lowest maximum speed, i.e. 158 + 150 comnbo not to exceed 75 mph.
I remember a 156 (or 155) shortly after introduction doing about 90 on a test run between Leeds and York. Unfortunately I can't remember any more details. This would indicate that they should not be damaged if dragged by a 158 at that speed.
No they are not. Their max speed is 90mph.SWT 159s are booked and fully capable of doing 100mph in between Basingstoke and Surbiton.![]()
Blackpool-York between micklefield and York. They have to as they usually have a 185 Middlesbrough bound on their backsides!
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
This could be why 170/171's are not allowed to multi with any 14x units. Don't think a 142 doing a tonne would do its drive train any good. Some of these units are restricted to 60 as it is...
A 156 on a hot day with the windows open is a very noisy train for the passengers to sit on. A 158 with the air conditioning working properly is a much nicer experience.
Class 171s cant physically couple to a 170 or any other type of DMU as they are fitted with a different type of coupling.
They can couple to a Electrostar but for emergency clearance only.
No they are not. Their max speed is 90mph.
Then why does Porterbrook claim they are only capable of 90mph?Actually, yes they do. Class 159s that run on the west of England have a max speed of 100mph, not including overspeed. This is because they have 400hp engines compared to 350hp on a Class 158. In the cab of a 158 it says 90mph and in the cab of a SWT 159 (which I have been in numerous times) it says 100mph MAX.
Actually, yes they do. Class 159s that run on the west of England have a max speed of 100mph, not including overspeed. This is because they have 400hp engines compared to 350hp on a Class 158. In the cab of a 158 it says 90mph and in the cab of a SWT 159 (which I have been in numerous times) it says 100mph MAX.
Actually, yes they do. Class 159s that run on the west of England have a max speed of 100mph, not including overspeed. This is because they have 400hp engines compared to 350hp on a Class 158. In the cab of a 158 it says 90mph and in the cab of a SWT 159 (which I have been in numerous times) it says 100mph MAX.