• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Ex GC 221s to move to EMR

DaveyJones

Member
Joined
12 Mar 2023
Messages
226
Location
UK
They are older units and these particular ones have spent time out of use, which usually isn't good for reliability.
This pair have barely been out of use, they went from Avanti to Grand Central pretty swiftly, and one of them is in traffic today

 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,673
Location
Hampshire
I believe this is the pair at GC, which have been out and about every day.

Indeed they are, Arriva / GC obviously has enough confidence in the Adelante’s now, potentially with 4 more arriving, that these two can depart the fleet for pastures new.
 

45Fox

Member
Joined
17 May 2022
Messages
162
Location
Leicester
I'm afraid that I can see all sorts of pitfalls to having just a pair of 221s interworking amongst a (admittedly reduced & further reducing) fleet of 222s.

Most of them have already been well covered by other posters:

● crew training
● incompatability between the two classes
● crew traction knowledge for specific depots
● maintanence location/requirements
● methods of door operation & train despatch
● neccessity to ensure they keep to specific diagrams
(The above list is not exhaustive).

The last two listed bullet points could prove to be very troublesome; should they be moved at short notice onto a diagram that includes short platforms (Long Eaton, for example, only 4 cars fit there) this would create problems as 221s are not fitted with SDO.
 

InTheEastMids

Established Member
Joined
31 Jan 2016
Messages
1,415
Can the 222s keep to time on 4?
In my recent experience yes.

It would be ironic if part of the reason the 810 programme is in the state its in is because of complex re-engineering to deliver performance that they didn't strictly need...
 

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
8,430
Location
UK
I'm afraid that I can see all sorts of pitfalls to having just a pair of 221s interworking amongst a (admittedly reduced & further reducing) fleet of 222s.

Most of them have already been well covered by other posters:

● crew training
● incompatability between the two classes
● crew traction knowledge for specific depots
● maintanence location/requirements
● methods of door operation & train despatch
● neccessity to ensure they keep to specific diagrams
(The above list is not exhaustive).

The last two listed bullet points could prove to be very troublesome; should they be moved at short notice onto a diagram that includes short platforms (Long Eaton, for example, only 4 cars fit there) this would create problems as 221s are not fitted with SDO.

No different to how the 180s and HSTs operated before

There are only 3 train crew depots for EMR for the intercity side. Sheffield, Derby and St Pancras.

Would make sense to base the 221s on diagrams which are Derby out and backs which will be primarily Derby crews
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,922
Location
East Anglia
Let's hope Hitachi are paying for this and not the taxpayer.

Best to just get the short term lease agreed as the route is suffering quite severely currently. The financial side of things can be sorted at a later date.
 

Top