• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Euston Departure Boards

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hazlehead

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2012
Messages
124
Location
Yorkshire
At Euston today looks like they are dismantling the "new" departure screens. Screens have been removed & contractors are removing the wiring
 

Attachments

  • IMG20251007133338.jpg
    IMG20251007133338.jpg
    3.5 MB · Views: 837
  • IMG20251007133454.jpg
    IMG20251007133454.jpg
    4 MB · Views: 836
  • IMG20251007134601.jpg
    IMG20251007134601.jpg
    3.4 MB · Views: 828
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

stadler

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2023
Messages
3,304
Location
Horsley
At Euston today looks like they dismantling the "new" departure screens. Screens removed & contractors removing wiring
Why do they need that massive tall wall put up just to dismantle the boards. That seems like a massive overkill. Surely just some simple temporary barriers (like what gets used for temporary queueing systems) would have been far cheaper and quicker to set up.

But good to see them taken down. It will add less clutter to the concourse. They should never have replaced the large main boards in the first place.
 

class442

Member
Joined
12 May 2024
Messages
78
Location
Midlands
Awesome. I was there on the night they were being put up, I remember it was a described as a 'trial'.

The main reason I didn't like them is that they had different info on each side, e.g. train times on one side and disruption advice on the other, meaning you had to circle them to get the full message. Very inefficient compared to having all info on one plane.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,091
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Awesome. I was there on the night they were being put up, I remember it was a described as a 'trial'.

It was as much of a "trial" as the LNER fare increase one - but at least common sense has prevailed here!

Removing the "trial" boards is the final welcome step which should prevent people standing blocking the platform "tunnel" as it'll revert to not being possible to see a board from there as was the case before. It's interesting how their modelling software said it would "work" but none of us who used the station frequently thought it would or did - it just caused people to stand in the way of the route from the corner entrance doors to the platforms. It'd have worked if the entrances were in the middle (as say the main access from the Tube is at Paddington), but the location of the Tube escalators make that impossible.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

The main reason I didn't like them is that they had different info on each side, e.g. train times on one side and disruption advice on the other, meaning you had to circle them to get the full message. Very inefficient compared to having all info on one plane.

That was actually a later change to resolve a problem they caused, namely that having train departure information on the board on the right facing the platforms meant everyone stood blocking the main entrance from the Tube (as that was the first board you saw on entering from there, and the vast majority of passengers enter on that side as it's the main route from the Tube, the bus station, Kings X/St P and the Euston Road - people entering from the Euston Square side are far fewer in number). It was therefore necessary to remove departure information, and so the board didn't look stupid because it was blank they put the disruption information on it instead.

I did think it might work better if they removed that board and only had one transverse one about two thirds of the way down (i.e. roughly where the second one was) so people would enter from the Tube and then naturally move towards it out of the way, but really putting it back where it was originally is so much better.
 
Last edited:

Hazlehead

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2012
Messages
124
Location
Yorkshire
I
Why do they need that massive tall wall put up just to dismantle the boards. That seems like a massive overkill. Surely just some simple temporary barriers (like what gets used for temporary queueing systems) would have been far cheaper and quicker to set up.

But good to see them taken down. It will add less clutter to the concourse. They should never have replaced the large main boards in the first place.
I assume as they are taking off screws, nuts & bolts, pulling out wires etc and also using lift ladders working at height to dismantle the pillars & framework that there is the risk of bits flying off in all directions or parts dropped so Health & safety will dictate that boards are needed

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

OT - I note from the second photo 6 mins until departure time that the 1341 Liverpool doesn't have a platform on the screen yet!
I think a train had failed in the station so stepping up sets
 

Sorcerer

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2022
Messages
2,043
Location
Liverpool
While I am glad they are getting rid of the smaller departure boards, it still feels like a bit of a shambles. Having people looking up at a single large departure board just works better at station like Euston with it's limited space. The only way that they could've made it worse is if they put the smaller departure boards in the corridor between the concourse and the platforms (please don't get any ideas Network Rail).
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,616
Location
Nottingham
Why do they need that massive tall wall put up just to dismantle the boards. That seems like a massive overkill. Surely just some simple temporary barriers (like what gets used for temporary queueing systems) would have been far cheaper and quicker to set up.

But good to see them taken down. It will add less clutter to the concourse. They should never have replaced the large main boards in the first place.

I assume as they are taking off screws, nuts & bolts, pulling out wires etc and also using lift ladders working at height to dismantle the pillars & framework that there is the risk of bits flying off in all directions or parts dropped so Health & safety will dictate that boards are needed
Looking at the photo, they would need that much space to move those elevating platforms around, particularly if one needed to drive round to the other side of the screens.

Interesting though that the only person visible working at height has foregone the elevating platform for a less safe step ladder.
 
Joined
9 Dec 2012
Messages
836
Where will they end up, are there any places where they would make an actual improvement. Surely they won't just be dumped.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
10,962
Location
London
I note Network Rail hired a new "Head of Station Operations" for Euston whose main work seems to have been undoing all the disastrous decisions from the last couple of years and implementing many of the common-sense approaches (like earlier boarding) that most of the forum had identified.
 

OuterDistant

Member
Joined
25 Oct 2010
Messages
606
Location
TOPS Area 43
Even to an occasional station user, these things were ****ing useless.

Let's hope they never do anything like this again.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,682
I note Network Rail hired a new "Head of Station Operations" for Euston whose main work seems to have been undoing all the disastrous decisions from the last couple of years and implementing many of the common-sense approaches (like earlier boarding) that most of the forum had identified.

She’s very good.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
22,744
Location
West of Andover
Where will they end up, are there any places where they would make an actual improvement. Surely they won't just be dumped.
Maybe at Paddington?

At least they are keeping the one in the smoking area outside the station, useful at a glance to see if the train you were hoping to catch hasn't been cancelled
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,091
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Correct - a lot of advertising revenue lost.

Interestingly there used to be video advertising boards about the size of a standard outdoor poster at both ends of the old board which didn't really bother anybody - at present this space is blank, presumably because they are nervous of the fallout of putting the adverts back there.

However, if you're actually suggesting it was a good idea, I'm going to suggest you spend too much time going Fenny<->MKC and don't use Euston enough to know how much of an utter disaster this change was for the station.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,892
Location
Fenny Stratford
However, if you're actually suggesting it was a good idea, I'm going to suggest you spend too much time going Fenny<->MKC and don't use Euston enough to know how much of an utter disaster this change was for the station.
I am in Euston several times a week so the changes with screens didn't really bother me. What bothers me more is the underground entrance/exit layout. The flow of people doesn't seem to work properly.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,091
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I am in Euston several times a week so the changes with screens didn't really bother me.

Odd, as to me it was the most stupid thing that has ever been done to the station, it caused all manner of problems with flows into, out of and around the station, particularly when busy.

What bothers me more is the underground entrance/exit layout. The flow of people doesn't seem to work properly.

I'd agree that the 180 degree turn there really doesn't work. I know why they wanted to separate them, but I think I would reopen the access directly into the station and only close it when there is a need to segregate e.g. out of hours and during severe disruption.
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
8,241
An example of where "leaving it the railway experts" results in a terrible decision.

And not the only bad decision in London terminals. The ludicrously small toilets provided in the London Bridge rebuild being another terrible choice.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,892
Location
Fenny Stratford
Odd, as to me it was the most stupid thing that has ever been done to the station, it caused all manner of problems with flows into, out of and around the station, particularly when busy.
the screens were/are much easier to read than the ones they replaced. They are clear, bright, colourful and helpful - they were just in the wrong place.

I try just to get on with things and not worry about small items. Honestly the concourse didn't seem any worse or better with the screens there. It is ALWAYS crowded at peak times. You just have to bash through!
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,616
Location
Nottingham
the screens were/are much easier to read than the ones they replaced. They are clear, bright, colourful and helpful - they were just in the wrong place.
How does the the current big screen compare for legibility with the one in the same place that was replaced?
 

Hazlehead

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2012
Messages
124
Location
Yorkshire
Was rushing through today so I didn't manage to get a photo but the one yesterday has now gone, bar the 2 pillars of course. They'll move onto the second one tonight I've been told
 

Skie

Established Member
Joined
22 Dec 2008
Messages
1,238
But they had heat maps and everything to prove the stupid new boards were a better solution! :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top