nlogax
Established Member
Nicely done @NorthernSpirit, that is really some top tinfoilhattery and industrial grade hard right BS you've bought into.
Someone mentioned that the term Nazi is short for National Socialist
Indeed when the nazi party was originally formed it did have socialist ideas (though always dominated by nationalism and anti-semitism), Hitler swept those away though after he took it over and chased corporate backers and the middle classes. The final removal of "socialism" coming with the Night of the Long Knives and the killing of Ernest Rohm.
Agreed, seems strange that any country with the word 'democratic' in the title is anything but.I'll only get worried if the country is renamed a Democratic Republic.
True, but don't spoil the chance for leavers to rant about foregners, - they need their daily fix.Agreed, seems strange that any country with the word 'democratic' in the title is anything but.
As for the EU-Nazi comparisons, I just don't get it. Esp. as whilst Germany is so called the controller by some, it seems a lot of the rules that brexiteers seem to hate were instigated by the UK.
Two things:I hear the Grayling clown has been on the news pontificating about Brexit.
No one gives a toss what you think about Brexit Grayling. Do your job and get the trains running.
Worded by, not instigated by.Agreed, seems strange that any country with the word 'democratic' in the title is anything but.
As for the EU-Nazi comparisons, I just don't get it. Esp. as whilst Germany is so called the controller by some, it seems a lot of the rules that brexiteers seem to hate were instigated by the UK.
Two things:
1. He couldn't make a bigger mess of Brexit than the clowns already in charge; and
2. He couldn't make a bigger mess of Brexit than he has of the trains.
*DING*
I'd really rather he didn't. He's already made enough of a mess as it is.My point is - his job is the trains - he should concentrate on that.
Well, let's look at the European Single Market, as an example.Worded by, not instigated by.
I'd really rather he didn't. He's already made enough of a mess as it is.
Well, let's look at the European Single Market, as an example.
Baron Cockfield went to the Delors Commission (he was a Vice-President to the Commission at the time) to take the initiative to attempt to relaunch the common market. Cockfield wrote and published a White Paper in 1985 identifying 300 measures to be addressed in order to complete a single market. That White Paper was well received and led to the adoption of the Single European Treaty, the treaty which reformed the decision-making mechanisms of the EEC. He's often referred to as 'The Father Of The Single Market'.
It was a core objective of the EEC since its formation. For various reasons, it hadn't really worked properly, and it was Thatcher that sent Cockfield to Brussels to try and sort it out.Perhaps that's where we went wrong.
Did we (or anyone else ) actually want the common market relaunched.
Perhaps we should have stuck with an economic community.
It was a core objective of the EEC since its formation. For various reasons, it hadn't really worked properly, and it was Thatcher that sent Cockfield to Brussels to try and sort it out.
If it wasn’t, the EEC wouldn’t have adopted it.And he did it in the worst possible way - the Thatcherite way. As with every Conservative government, no one enquired whether this philosophy was agreed with everywhere else.
I said before that people don't understand how the EEC works. It seems I was being kind.If it wasn’t, the EEC wouldn’t have adopted it.
So those who want to see closer ties with our Commonwealth cousins are somehow racist? Despite the obvious links between us (family, history, language, monarch, business, system of Government). Yet those who want ever-closer ties with the (predominantly white Christian) EU are not?Interesting to see the Daily Globe linked. The DG is run by CANZUK supporters. For those of you who don't know, CANZUK is for people who believe in greater ties between the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, i.e. the "White Commonwealth". Seems a natural fit for British Nationalist parties. Any resemblance between their articles and the truth is likely to be purely incidental.
It was a core objective of the EEC since its formation. For various reasons, it hadn't really worked properly, and it was Thatcher that sent Cockfield to Brussels to try and sort it out.
The electorate had already been asked, in the 1975 referendum. Not for nothing was the EEC often referred to as ‘the Common Market’.Well no one botherd to ask the electorate for it, but the Tories send what they want for a Tory Europe.
The electorate had already been asked, in the 1975 referendum. Not for nothing was the EEC often referred to as ‘the Common Market’.
We didn't get the option of whether we were joining or not in 1973
This is also of some interest. Want proof, well here it is.
http://www.dailyglobe.co.uk/comment...Q7xhs9ONfS2tO0lEw2OZzeeF2yhV_35uBUegsVBaP8Qo8
Don't tell me that the EU was built for peace as it wasn't.
Someone mentioned that the term Nazi is short for National Socialist, well if you took any interest in history when in school you'll find that it is. Sadly this forum seems to think that no matter how many links you post from the Guardian / Owen Jones' creche or the (Sub)Standard (which are both lefty papers) that someone with a opposing view will take you serious, as they won't.
Some of you should watch the videos made by "Reverend Simon Sideways" as he does point out facts.
Why just those three countries? There are 53 nations in the Commonwealth.So those who want to see closer ties with our Commonwealth cousins are somehow racist?
And that's something we have an opt-out from....perhaps we should have been considering what "ever closer union" actually meant.
It's all too late now.
And that's something we have an opt-out from.