• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

EMR's ERMA period has finished - what next?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
10 Jan 2022
Messages
54
Location
UK
So apparently the Emergency Recovery Measures Agreement for EMR ended yesterday (October 16th). They're being given a "direct reward" of a 4 year extension (source below) but what does this mean, is it EMR now completely in charge of their services and fares, or is there government intervention?

If I remember correctly, it's government policy that when licences run out, operations are then controlled by the government, just branded as the company "in charge" of the franchise. How does this extension fit into that?

 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

skyhigh

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2014
Messages
6,904
It'll essentially just be a 4 year extension of the ERMA.

If I remember correctly, it's government policy that when licences run out, operations are then controlled by the government, just branded as the company "in charge" of the franchise. How does this extension fit into that?
If by that you mean they transfer to the Operator of Last Resort then no. The current thing seems to be extending the management contracts brought in by the ERMA (see Avanti for example) with the owning group being paid a management fee but most decisions and revenue risk resting on the DfT.
 

Scanderina

Member
Joined
16 Sep 2020
Messages
32
Location
UK
So apparently the Emergency Recovery Measures Agreement for EMR ended yesterday (October 16th). Wikipedia says they're being given a "direcr reward" of a 4 year extension but what does this mean, is it EMR now completely in charge of their services and fares, or is there government intervention?

If I remember correctly, it's government policy that when licences run out, operations are then controlled by the government, just branded as the company "in charge" of the franchise. How does this extension fit into that?
A 'direct award' is simply a description of the way the contract goes to the existing operator without a competition. It doesn't describe the type of contract that they're on. They will either be on an ERMA or a NRC - they are similar contracts where the revenue risk rests with DfT.

In summary, very little changes except the current operator gets a four-year extension.
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
8,933
A National Rail Contract was signed a couple of weeks ago for a minimum of 4 years with possible extensions until 2030.
 

SCDR_WMR

Established Member
Joined
17 Dec 2017
Messages
2,637
Location
Crewe
I would imagine they now have an NRC same as WMT have. So simply a management contract.

Whether the buyout of the Abellio TOCs from Dominic Booth will affect this I don't know
 

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
7,245
Location
UK
I would imagine they now have an NRC same as WMT have. So simply a management contract.

Whether the buyout of the Abellio TOCs from Dominic Booth will affect this I don't know
If the taxpayer is taking all the decisions and all the risk, I do wonder what the point of having the private sector involved at all is?
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,950
Location
Mold, Clwyd
If the taxpayer is taking all the decisions and all the risk, I do wonder what the point of having the private sector involved at all is?
Because the current legislation requires rail services to be contracted to the private sector (unless they fall into temporary OLR control).
All the ERMA/NRCs are pending the launch of GBR which may change the context if it ever takes off.
But then the recent government changes might impact all that...
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,911
Location
East Anglia
If the taxpayer is taking all the decisions and all the risk, I do wonder what the point of having the private sector involved at all is?
Especially if they don’t allow them to give their staff a pay rise without permission Grrrrr!!!
 

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
7,245
Location
UK
Because the current legislation requires rail services to be contracted to the private sector (unless they fall into temporary OLR control).
All the ERMA/NRCs are pending the launch of GBR which may change the context if it ever takes off.
But then the recent government changes might impact all that...
I forgot the vomit inducing name of "Great British xxxxxxx".
 

Wyrleybart

Established Member
Joined
29 Mar 2020
Messages
2,641
Location
South Staffordshire
Imagine the DfT have to somehow "stimulate the market" to encourage corporates to become interested in the contracts. As of now Abellio (non UK) have followed NX and Virgin out of the Rail industry, along with Prism and maybe also Stagecoach. Presume DfT are increasingly looking towards the far east for companies to be involved in running our passenger trains. But stability ????
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top