• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

EMR London terminal capacity

Status
Not open for further replies.

py_megapixel

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2018
Messages
7,488
Location
Northern England
Replying here to avoid derailing the EMR new stock thread

At one time, there was talk of EMR using one of the current Eurostar platforms, but now they talk about more platforms for Eurostar.
Is Eurostar actually using all of its platform capacity at the moment? The passenger capacity restriction for Eurostar at the moment is the passport control process, not the actual number of seats available, so it seems unlikely that Eurostar would need any more platform capacity than it already has for the foreseeable future.

Probably a stupid question, but could EMR use a different terminus for additional capacity? King's Cross?
I'm not totally sure it's possible for trains from the midland main line to terminate elsewhere in London, short of sending them through the Thameslink core, which is clearly ridiculous and utterly infeasible. Have they use KGX in the past e.g. in times of disruption?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Trainman40083

Established Member
Joined
29 Jan 2024
Messages
4,603
Location
Derby
Replying here to avoid derailing the EMR new stock thread


Is Eurostar actually using all of its platform capacity at the moment? The passenger capacity restriction for Eurostar at the moment is the passport control process, not the actual number of seats available, so it seems unlikely that Eurostar would need any more platform capacity than it already has for the foreseeable future.


I'm not totally sure it's possible for trains from the midland main line to terminate elsewhere in London, short of sending them through the Thameslink core, which is clearly ridiculous and utterly infeasible. Have they use KGX in the past e.g. in times of disruption?
But there is talk of additional operators to Eurostar, running channel tunnel services. I am not sure any more platforms can be fitted in, to the existing envelope. I doubt EMR could ever use Kings Cross station...always seems pretty full to me. . I guess Thameslink trains could extend to Corby. Failing that, you'd be looking at extra platforms on the side of St Pancras. Of course, the original plan would have been users from Derby/Nottingham and northwards use HS2 Eastern leg
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,337
Probably a stupid question, but could EMR use a different terminus for additional capacity? King's Cross?
Why do they need additional platform capacity? There are sufficient platforms at St Pancras for six trains an hour, and no capacity on the line ahead for more EMR trains. The new trains are designed to match the platform length.
 

eastwestdivide

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2009
Messages
3,411
Location
S Yorks, usually
Have they use KGX in the past e.g. in times of disruption?
Can't think of any instances of that. In any case, no route possible without a substantial increase in journey time.
Back in the 1980s, there were a few engineering diversions of Midland mainline services via Bedford-Bletchley to Euston (one of which I caught - photos somewhere), but again with a massive time penalty over the ~35 mins between Bedford and St P.
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
6,479
Location
Sheffield
Why do they need additional platform capacity? There are sufficient platforms at St Pancras for six trains an hour, and no capacity on the line ahead for more EMR trains. The new trains are designed to match the platform length.

Quite. How do you add train length capacity if line capacity is fully utilised?

If EMR attracted 50% incresad demand over the next 10-15 years how could it be satisfied? They probably wouldn't have enough roilling stock either and a further add on order may not be possible.
 

Trainman40083

Established Member
Joined
29 Jan 2024
Messages
4,603
Location
Derby
Quite. How do you add train length capacity if line capacity is fully utilised?

If EMR attracted 50% incresad demand over the next 10-15 years how could it be satisfied? They probably wouldn't have enough roilling stock either and a further add on order may not be possible.
Wasn't that the point of the planned digital signalling, expected to cover the Midland Mainline? In that you can (supposedly) get more capacity by trains running closer together with in cab signalling.
 

miklcct

Established Member
Joined
2 May 2021
Messages
5,017
Location
Cricklewood
Why do they need additional platform capacity? There are sufficient platforms at St Pancras for six trains an hour, and no capacity on the line ahead for more EMR trains. The new trains are designed to match the platform length.
There is clearly insufficient platform capacity at St Pancras when the Thameslink core is unavailable.

When the core operates normally, there are 4 Thameslink regional trains per hour to Bedford, and 6 Thameslink suburban trains per hour to Luton and St Albans.

When the core is closed, the service is degraded to 2 Thameslink regional trains per hour and 2 Thameslink suburban trains per hour, because there is only one spare platform available. The Intercity uses 2 platforms and the Connect uses 1 platform, leaving only 1 platform for displaced Thameslink services.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,817
Wasn't that the point of the planned digital signalling, expected to cover the Midland Mainline? In that you can (supposedly) get more capacity by trains running closer together with in cab signalling.

Nope.

Cab signalling with Automatic Train Operation (ATO) gives additional capacity on intensively worked, high frequency railways - see Thameslink core, Elizabeth Line core, and most of the underground. It gives little capacity benefit on lower frequency routes.

The capacity issue on the Midland Main Line is the various stopping patterns of services using the fast lines between West Hampstead and Leicester, which are needed to adequately serve the various markets on the line. Extra EMR platforms at St Pancras do nothing to resolve that.
 
Last edited:

cslusarc

Member
Joined
27 Jan 2011
Messages
167
If more capacity on the Midland Mainline is needed then EMR should run more 10-car Meridian (or class 810) diagrams, even if it requires splitting/joining at somewhere like East Midland Parkway.
 

Magdalia

Established Member
Joined
1 Jan 2022
Messages
7,389
Location
The Fens
We have done this before, and very recently.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top