Realtime Trains - 571N 1104 Haymarket Depot to Crewe C.S.
Realtime Trains is an independent source of live realtime running information for the Great British railway network.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Probably the wrong thread to be asking this but what was this movement of 170430 for? Are Scotrail transferring any more 170s to EMR?
Ah ok makes sense, thank you!ScotRail are having overhaul work completed on their 170s by Crewe LNWR / Arriva Traincare.
Class 170s do have aircon. When l rode a WMR version earlier this month it felt almost arctic even during the heatwave. Suggests that the one you were on has problems.I took a ride on 170420 from Nottingham to Mansfield the other day. The interior was filthy, it really needs a deep clean. It was also boiling hot, do the 170s have air con?
I took a ride on 170420 from Nottingham to Mansfield the other day. The interior was filthy, it really needs a deep clean. It was also boiling hot, do the 170s have air con?
I’ve noticed this quite a lot recently on a lot of different trains and different operators where trains seem to be much hotter inside than I remember them being.It was also boiling hot, do the 170s have air con?
Rail Minister praises emission reduction technology trialled by EMR
Monday, 5 July 2021
Rail Minister Chris Heaton-Harris has praised the trial of a new piece of emission reduction technology fitted to a train running between Matlock and Derby.
- Tests show a reduction of 80% in emissions
- 'Greener' train running between Derby and Matlock
- £600k pilot to understand if tech could be used wider in industry
In partnership with rolling stock company Porterbrook, and emissions specialist, Eminox, EMR has fit a 2-box emissions reduction system to the exhaust of a Class 170 train operating in full passenger usage between Derby and Matlock.
The £600,000 trial, which is funded by EMR, Porterbrook and the Department for Transport, through its funding programme delivered by Innovate UK, uses an oxidation catalyst and a filter to partly remove pollution from nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and particulate matter.
The trial also includes using an innovative low volume hydrostatic oil reservoir developed by Bosch Rexroth that utilises a double pump arrangement and hydrostatic oil to drive the engine cooling fans and the alternator, which in turn provides electrical power to the train.
The technology is capable of delivering similar outputs to the original system, but requires only 16 litres of hydrostatic oil compared to the 200 litres that is currently needed, delivering a significant reduction in space, weight and volume of oil required.
Performance data will be collected from the trial to understand if the technology will be a viable option for wider use in the industry - early indications show that emissions are reduced by up to 80 per cent.
Rail Minister Chris Heaton-Harris said: “It was fantastic to see one of our previous 'First of a Kind' competition winners in action at Derby station. Harnessing innovations like this will help to make our railways greener and cleaner as we build back better from Covid-19.
“This competition always throws up exciting innovations and the technology I have seen today, along with the winners of this year’s competition, could transform how we travel in future.”
Neil Bamford, Fleet Director at East Midlands Railway, said the company was delighted to be able to support the trial.
He said: “We are constantly looking for opportunities to reduce our environmental impact and deliver greener, cleaner journeys for our passengers. That is why we are excited to support this project and help explore if this innovative technology can have an impact on cutting down pollution.”
Mary Grant, Porterbrook CEO said: “As a rolling stock asset owner and manager, Porterbrook is committed to developing innovative technologies that can help reduce emissions from our diesel fleets. We are particularly pleased to be able to do this by drawing on proven technologies from other sectors.
“Porterbrook believes by partnering with East Midlands Railway and automotive after-treatment specialists, Eminox, we can accelerate the delivery of cleaner and more environmentally friendly trains on Britain’s railway.”
Jonathan Evans, Senior Programme Manager, Eminox, said: “Securing this funding reflects the innovative, first-of-a-kind nature of our project with East Midlands Railway and Porterbrook – and demonstrates our commitment to reducing harmful emissions across multiple sectors to help deliver a greener future.”
“The project will demonstrate the Eminox exhaust after-treatment technology, benefiting air quality and the environment. Given the large number of diesel trains currently operating in the UK, there are enormous possibilities to develop and deploy our technology on a wider scale, benefiting many communities across the country.”
No gone for an engine change at Tyseley then back to DerbyUpdate 170515 complete with emr side
branding and front branding looking very smart and very clean in outstanding emr livery is now at tyseley Depot in Birmingham it moved on Friday the 09th July 2021. On a special move 5h66 from derby etches park to tyseley.
So is back with west Midlands railways on loan.
Failed last night on a Leicester - Lincoln, moved to Derby on the back of the 2116 Crewe and is now at Etches Park for repairs.Does anybody know 511’s current status ?
Thank you.Failed last night on a Leicester - Lincoln, moved to Derby on the back of the 2116 Crewe and is now at Etches Park for repairs.
Thanks for the information.No gone for an engine change at Tyseley then back to Derby
That doesn't help at Lime St though. The problem there is platform sharing, a 6 car won't clear the signal at the platforms used if there's already a Northern train in there.So... Retrofit some ASDO then...?
Have the 170s been a bit of a disaster? They seem to accelerate slower than the 156's (although they also make a lot less noise), have a reduction in seats and aren't overall designed for local services.
What was really needed was a nationwide sprinter replacement fleet, or possibly tagging on to Northern's 195 order as they are pretty nippy trains for diesels!
I feel like the 170s are going to struggle in a number of ways, but at least the passenger experience is a bit more comfortable (except for during overcrowding...)
Whilst I can’t comment on EMR’s 170s, I can say that they keep to Sprinter timings on the hilly Harrogate loop line even though they can’t get into direct drive. The problems associated with using 168s/170s/171s are well documented on this forum, such as Northern’s units overheating on the Harrogate loop, although this shouldn’t be as much as a problem on EMR due to there being less gradients, on average longer distances between stations and more 70mph+ running. How well these units will be maintained long-term remains to be seen.They seem to accelerate slower than the 156's (although they also make a lot less noise), have a reduction in seats and aren't overall designed for local services.
I feel like the 170s are going to struggle in a number of ways, but at least the passenger experience is a bit more comfortable (except for during overcrowding...)
They were used on local services back in the Central Trains days, although they did cut some slack with being interchanged on routes such as Liverpool to Norwich.I think keeping 170s on local services with low speed can knacker the engines after a while. I think that was a particular issue in Scotland when they were on the likes of Anniesland or Fife Circle services.
That being the case, the Northern ones on the York-Harrogate- Leeds services must be suffering.I think keeping 170s on local services with low speed can knacker the engines after a while.
Northern 170s do a lot more than just the Harrogate loop!That being the case, the Northern ones on the York-Harrogate- Leeds services must be suffering.
Northern 170s do a lot more than just the Harrogate loop!
Scarborough - Sheffield, Hull - Halifax, among others
My point was that the Harrogate loop is a one hour slow speed journey, stopping every five minutes.Northern 170s do a lot more than just the Harrogate loop!
Scarborough - Sheffield, Hull - Halifax, among others
When Northern introduced 170s on the 60mph max Harrogate loop they were reported to be consuming vast quantites of fuel and oil. This was because they didn't go fast enough to get from hydraulic to direct drive. I beleive one unit was fitted with additional instrumentation to investigate the problem.Whilst I can’t comment on EMR’s 170s, I can say that they keep to Sprinter timings on the hilly Harrogate loop line even though they can’t get into direct drive. The problems associated with using 168s/170s/171s are well documented on this forum, such as Northern’s units overheating on the Harrogate loop, although this shouldn’t be as much as a problem on EMR due to there being less gradients, on average longer distances between stations and more 70mph+ running. How well these units will be maintained long-term remains to be seen.
All but two of the 156's are in regular service.P.s. is there any sign of the EMR 156 cast offs promised for Northern?
Which are those two please?All but two of the 156's are in regular service.
156909 and 156917. Both at Barrow Hill as far as I'm aware.Which are those two please?
Isn't 918 there too?156909 and 156917. Both at Barrow Hill as far as I'm aware.
Speeds have increased on the west I think - Manchester - Preston/Blackpool via Bolton is quite widely 100mph after the electrification.When Northern introduced 170s on the 60mph max Harrogate loop they were reported to be consuming vast quantites of fuel and oil. This was because they didn't go fast enough to get from hydraulic to direct drive. I beleive one unit was fitted with additional instrumentation to investigate the problem.
At the time is was said on here regearing them to say 75mph would be benificial to both there poor accelaration and high fuel consumption. Very little of Northerns west side needs 100mph units.
May be true of EMR too.
K
P.s. is there any sign of the EMR 156 cast offs promised for Northern?