• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Elizabeth Line Station Names Query

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tobberz

Member
Joined
9 Jan 2018
Messages
112
Hi, apologies if this has been discussed before.

I was curious why stations on the Elizabeth line that serve multiple pre-existing stations have not got the King's Cross St Pancras treatment.

i.e., why are there not stations named "Liverpool St Moorgate" and "Farringdon Barbican"? It's the way the Parisians sometimes do it too (e.g., Châtelet–Les Halles).

I also understand that scheme is intended to be used in the proposed Euston St Pancras (Crossrail 2) station.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
10,990
Location
London
Hi, apologies if this has been discussed before.

I was curious why stations on the Elizabeth line that serve multiple pre-existing stations have not got the King's Cross St Pancras treatment.

i.e., why are there not stations named "Liverpool St Moorgate" and "Farringdon Barbican"? It's the way the Parisians sometimes do it too (e.g., Châtelet–Les Halles).

I also understand that scheme is intended to be used in the proposed Euston St Pancras (Crossrail 2) station.

Not sure exactly why but I would suggest simplicity and primacy.

Simplicity being one station name easier to understand and we've not really tended to do it the French way and Kings Cross St Pancras is rather unique and renamed in 1933 so is longstanding.

As for primacy Liverpool Street was where TfL Rail used to run and was the terminus of the GEML stopping service, so transferring that name only across made sense. Barbican is a very small link at the station and Farringdon already had the Thameslink service.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,317
Location
Yorkshire
Not sure exactly why but I would suggest simplicity and primacy.

Simplicity being one station name easier to understand and we've not really tended to do it the French way and Kings Cross St Pancras is rather unique and renamed in 1933 so is longstanding.

As for primacy Liverpool Street was where TfL Rail used to run and was the terminus of the GEML stopping service, so transferring that name only across made sense. Barbican is a very small link at the station and Farringdon already had the Thameslink service.
I like the way a pretty much perfect answer appears after just 6 minutes of the thread being opened :D

King's Cross St Pancras is not only longstanding as you correctly say, but is also fairly unique in that you have large termini literally across the road from each other, and it would not make any sense to attribute any of the tube lines as calling at one over the other, so the only sensible course of action is to name the entire tube station after both.

This situation isn't quite replicated on Crossrail; it's not the same situation as Moorgate/Liverpool Street (i.e. it's a false equivalence)
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
10,990
Location
London
This situation isn't quite replicated on Crossrail; it's not the same situation as Moorgate/Liverpool Street (i.e. it's a false equivalence)

The only quirk of this one is that technically the station is managed by London Underground Moorgate, as that is how the station layout was built and integrated
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,640
Location
Nottingham
I can see the logic for Farringdon, as the connection to Barbican is apparently low capacity and any interchange there can be made with roughly equal east at Farringdon. But that doesn't apply to Liverpool Street, because Moorgate has connections to the Northern and GN that Liverpool Street doesn't. So if I ruled the world I'd keep Farringdon but add Moorgate to Liverpool Street.
 

poffle

Member
Joined
11 Oct 2023
Messages
239
Location
Dublin, Ireland
If you called it Liverpool St/Moorgate then this would be a brand new station that would have to be shown on the maps. I think that would cause more confusion.

There are three West Hampsteads within walking distance but individual gatelines.

The station is called Liverpool St. But the maps clearly show that Moorgate is directly connected to Liverpool St Elizabeth line station.

Barbican and Oxford Circus aren't shown as connected to Elizabeth line on the map although there are signs on the platforms. For Barbican there is a large entrance to Farringdon Elizabeth line station just around the corner from the Barbican LU station entrance which has escalator access to the east end of the Farringdon Elizabeth line station.
 

Taunton

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
12,261
Barbican LU station has a small lift to the EL platform.
If connecting from westbound Liz to westbound Circle I find it easier and shorter to do so at the Barbican end rather than the Farringdon end.
 

W-on-Sea

Established Member
Joined
18 Dec 2009
Messages
1,447
Monument and Bank is probably the nearest parallel on the tube, although it's not quite identical. It's interesting that in the past the signs at Monument all included the words "FOR BANK", and some of those at Bank "FOR MONUMENT", but in recent decades this has been discarded.
 

LLivery

Established Member
Joined
13 Jul 2014
Messages
1,715
Location
Southeastern land
I agree that Farringdon makes sense, but I also find it not being 'Liverpool Street-Moorgate' strange.

If you called it Liverpool St/Moorgate then this would be a brand new station that would have to be shown on the maps. I think that would cause more confusion.

There are three West Hampsteads within walking distance but individual gatelines.

The station is called Liverpool St. But the maps clearly show that Moorgate is directly connected to Liverpool St Elizabeth line station.

Barbican and Oxford Circus aren't shown as connected to Elizabeth line on the map although there are signs on the platforms. For Barbican there is a large entrance to Farringdon Elizabeth line station just around the corner from the Barbican LU station entrance which has escalator access to the east end of the Farringdon Elizabeth line station.


On the Tube Map I'd argue it isn't clear whether the Crossrail platforms are called Liverpool Street or Moorgate. If I didn't know, and I wanted a GN Northern City train, I'd have no idea you could interchange for it until I got there.

They've also got around this at Kings Cross St Pancras, by now labelling it 'King's Cross & St Pancras International'
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,174
If connecting from westbound Liz to westbound Circle I find it easier and shorter to do so at the Barbican end rather than the Farringdon end.
Indeed. The Farringdon connection from Liz to Met lines is up, round, up, round, down, up…
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,270
Is it just about interchanging with other lines, or should Dean St and Hanover Square also be more prominent on the map?
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,640
Location
Nottingham
Is it just about interchanging with other lines, or should Dean St and Hanover Square also be more prominent on the map?
These are just alternative entrances to the same station. Many others also have multiple entrances which would logically also have to be shown if these ones were. That might make sense on a large-scale geographic map, but the main purpose of the Tube map is to support wayfinding around the network between specific stations, the user being presumed to know which stations are most convenient to their origin and destination. So yes, it's all about interchanging between lines.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top