railfan99
Established Member
Fair point. I will try to quote the unit designation if that is the best way to go.
Presumably @Watershed Is helping with that research with their post.The OP has mentioned previously they have not yet had the time to research all these things, and is not super knowledgeable on the class numbers etcI have similar problems when travelling on trains outside of the UK, especially when it comes to things like the NYC Subway.
The CAF Mk5 coaches used on the Caledonian Sleeper have a very unsettled ride, as with most modern CAF stock in Britain. The BR Mk3s used on the Night Riviera have a much smoother ride, interrupted only by the squeaking of the inter carriage connections every time the train brakes or accelerates...I have yet to get to it but the GWR NR was more enjoyable than Caledonian Sleeper. The sleeper rode better.
The CAF Mk5 coaches used on the Caledonian Sleeper have a very unsettled ride, as with most modern CAF stock in Britain. The BR Mk3s used on the Night Riviera have a much smoother ride, interrupted only by the squeaking of the inter carriage connections every time the train brakes or accelerates...
£90 for a berth sounds expensive to my ears, but I don't know if that is right or not. I am glad to hear the sleeper was good though. The old First Class lounge at Paddington was really nice, I don't know if it's even an option these days sadly. I just remember bits about it and I liked it way more than the one that was there when I last had need to use it.
You will have had a Class 57/6 on your sleeper train, and you might be interested to know the GWR IET you had to Taunton was Class 800/3 number 800321. I did have to check that one, as I could not remember if it was that one or 802101. The numbering of each part of the many IETs I have never got used to! I just checked and it was 57604 for your sleeper loco.
Huge thanks for giving loco etc nunbers.
I'll try and provide more as and when I can. We have so many classes of train here it can get very confusing, not so bad for us 'natives' but we're used to it!No, although clearly the stock's life is finite and I would expect it to run for perhaps another 5 or 10 years at most, having been refurbished a couple of years ago. However, the continued use of slam doors is the reason why the Night Riviera no longer serves as a local service within Cornwall, with all of the stations now pick up/set down only.Given Night Riv doors open outwarda, has ORR mandated a finite life date? I hope not.

Chocka, or chock-a-block, is also a British term for very full. I once had a colleague mis-type it as chock-a-bollock!Good to hear the GCR was enjoyable, although mega ouch to the uncomfortable night on the sleeper. Just to correct a typo, it would be 92023 at the head of your train
Chockas, I like that word and I'm going to try and adopt it for my upcoming trip report![]()
Chocka, or chock-a-block, is also a British term for very full. I once had a colleague mis-type it as chock-a-bollock!
Among rail enthusiasts, "wedged" or "wedge-out" tend to be used.
Or generational?Certainly it seems less well used, chockas that is, and I don't often hear someone say chock-a-block. Rammed, absolutely. Packed, most certainly. Wedged isn't one I hear anywhere, railway or not. Maybe it's a bit of a regional thing?
Just a bit of information.Sunday 2 October saw me presenting at a not overly busy Glasgow Queen St for the 0956 hours morning train of a three car DMU, 153373-52453-156453 for the trip to Oban, the last Scottish significant rural railway I had yet to do.

Another example, 390131 is the number of the whole train, which is one of the Class 390 type, and 69131 is a carriage numberrunning on time with car K 69131 and power car 390131. Patronage was light.
Doesn't matter in the slightest, of course, but just some information. 
For future reference if you are in the UK again you can use Real Time Trains to find out the platforms of trains long before they are displayed on the board:Sunday 2 October saw me presenting at a not overly busy Glasgow Queen St for the 0956 hours morning train of a three car DMU, 153373-52453-156453 for the trip to Oban, the last Scottish significant rural railway I had yet to do.
Annoyingly the platform was not indicated until five minutes before departure. If European railways can be so efficient at allocating platforms to each train, what stops UK rail operators? Sunday morning isn't a peak period!
The journey was as expected very scenic with a pleasant small (former?) signal box noted at Arrochar and Tarbet at 1115 to 1116, four minutes late and a very narrow road amazingly with a set of traffic lights protecting a narrow road from turning traffic five minutes after departing Loch Awe at 1220 hours, on time. At the Falls station, an upper semaphore was noted: great.
At Taynuilt we crossed 156457 (two cars if I recorded it correctly) that was already at the station as we arrived. It wasted no time in departing and was well patronised.
There were 20 plus off when we arrived at Oban at 1313 hours, nine minutes late. Some of the trip was very slow that I ascribe to steep gradients. I don't know if temporary speed restrictions contributed.
It was pleasant to walk around Oban that while seeing many tourists on a Sunday lacked Venetian-style crowding. The weather had been dull on the train from Glasgow but improved a bit while in Oban.
Returning to Glasgow on the 1610 up saw the same set in use, but better patronised. There were quite a few foreigners (including backpackers) who joined at Oban,with the guard having to go trackside to operate a set of points a minute or so after we'd pulled out of the station.
My feet were aching due to huge amounts of walking so unusually I didn't record the arrival time, but we halted for a couple of minutes before being given the road for a platform at Glasgow. An enjoyable day and great to see no 'rail replacement buses'.
My Eurailpass was checked on the forward journey but not on the return.