• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

ECML Resignalling Effect On Railtours

Status
Not open for further replies.

LiftFan

Member
Joined
27 May 2016
Messages
368
As I understand, the ECML is going to move to in-cab signalling in the not too distant future. For me this begs the question- what will the effect be on railtours (and freight)? Will groups such as West Coast, Riviera Trains and all need to start installing the new equipment in cabs of old locos or will there still be colour light signalling available?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

stuartl

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2014
Messages
242
There is a project going on to fit a trial ects system to Tornado which if successful could be fitted to others.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,265
We had a thread about the Tornado stuff for ETCS, here:

If you follow the link in my post #2 in that thread, you’ll find a detailed presentation about Tornado, and the new P2.
 

Tony73E

Member
Joined
16 Jun 2022
Messages
28
Location
Faversham
ETCS installation on the ECML will obviously become a problem for rolling stock operating over it when the lineside signals are decommisioned. It is my understanding that Network Rail do not intend to fund installtion of ETCS equipment to all rolling stock that could operate over the route today instead proposing haulage by ETCS-equipped traction or re-routing. It begs the question as to what would and what would not qualify for fitment. As an example fitting Tornado which is likely to operate on the ECML pretty regularly is logical. But would Clun Castle which has just visited Kings Cross quailfy?
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,941
Location
Airedale
ETCS installation on the ECML will obviously become a problem for rolling stock operating over it when the lineside signals are decommisioned. It is my understanding that Network Rail do not intend to fund installtion of ETCS equipment to all rolling stock that could operate over the route today instead proposing haulage by ETCS-equipped traction or re-routing. It begs the question as to what would and what would not qualify for fitment. As an example fitting Tornado which is likely to operate on the ECML pretty regularly is logical. But would Clun Castle which has just visited Kings Cross quailfy?
No reason why it shouldn't qualify, if it is technically possible, but who pays?
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
5,058
As I understand, the ECML is going to move to in-cab signalling in the not too distant future. For me this begs the question- what will the effect be on railtours (and freight)? Will groups such as West Coast, Riviera Trains and all need to start installing the new equipment in cabs of old locos or will there still be colour light signalling available?

Various locomotives owned by charter operators have been identified as undergoing trials with ETCS fitment, such as Class 37 and 47 diesels and various steam locomotives. I believe someone in NR or within the ETCS project will be in possession of the list of exactly which locos will be fitted initially.
 

Trestrol

Member
Joined
12 Apr 2022
Messages
273
Location
Newcastle
Depends what you mean by not to distant future. ETCS will only reach Grantham by 2030. After that who knows, ECTS is expensive and unless someone coughs up a lot of cash then it won't happen. This is the problem with our railway funding that there is never enough money to go around. Also things go obsolete so quickly and Network Rail can't always rip out a newish system and replace it. Network Rail still has plenty of near 100 year old equipment still in use. SSI which is signalled north of Doncaster to Edinburgh will need to be replaced by 2050. Although it may be extended.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,170
Various locomotives owned by charter operators have been identified as undergoing trials with ETCS fitment, such as Class 37 and 47 diesels and various steam locomotives. I believe someone in NR or within the ETCS project will be in possession of the list of exactly which locos will be fitted initially.
Very much in flux as none of the 'charter' locomotives are currently included in the Class 37 & Class 47 vehicle lists.

It is my understanding that Network Rail do not intend to fund installtion of ETCS equipment to all rolling stock that could operate over the route today instead proposing haulage by ETCS-equipped traction or re-routing.
To a certain extent, Network Rail has to cover the costs, For example, NR paid for 3 x Class 37 to be 'revived' and fitted with Hitachi ETCS on behalf of WCRC. But none of the three (97301, 37668, 37669) have operated Cambrian ETCS trains in anger.

And now Network Rail is seemingly on a path to jettisoning the Siemens ETCS fitment for Class 37 and Class 47/57...
 
Last edited:

31160

Established Member
Joined
18 Mar 2018
Messages
1,274
I just hope one or more of the tour operators is switched on enough to run some charters with classes that definitely aren't going to be fitted, ie 20,33 45 50 & 56 before the curtains come down say start in the Midlands with one class into the terminus with something else on the rear to work straight back out. Its like that later lntercity job with the 90s I'm sure a 86 or 87 would tick a few boxes for peeps
 

Tim M

Member
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
204
Depends what you mean by not to distant future. ETCS will only reach Grantham by 2030. After that who knows, ECTS is expensive and unless someone coughs up a lot of cash then it won't happen. This is the problem with our railway funding that there is never enough money to go around. Also things go obsolete so quickly and Network Rail can't always rip out a newish system and replace it. Network Rail still has plenty of near 100 year old equipment still in use. SSI which is signalled north of Doncaster to Edinburgh will need to be replaced by 2050. Although it may be extended.
Just a quick note About the ECML. Where SSI is installed, e.g. parts of the Peterborough area, York to Berwick and Edinburgh Waverley, the interlocking ‘cubicles’ can be replaced with compatable systems such as Westlock and Surelock without the need to change the trackside equipment. Both these systems have the neccesary interface to an ETCS Block Processor.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,170
I just hope one or more of the tour operators is switched on enough to run some charters with classes that definitely aren't going to be fitted, ie 20,33 45 50 & 56 before the curtains come down say start in the Midlands with one class into the terminus with something else on the rear to work straight back out.
Unless you know something that my team doesn't, Class 56 is still on the 'Freight' programme.
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
5,058
Very much in flux as none of the 'charter' locomotives are currently included in the Class 37 & Class 47 vehicle lists.


To a certain extent, Network Rail has to cover the costs, For example, NR paid for 3 x Class 37 to be 'revived' and fitted with Hitachi ETCS on behalf of WCRC. But none of the three (97301, 37668, 37669) have operated Cambrian ETCS trains in anger.

And now Network Rail is seemingly on a path to jettisoning the Siemens ETCS fitment for Class 37 and Class 47/57...

And yet you specifically mention 37668 and 37669 which as WCRC locomotives are fairly regularly used on charter trains and their associated ECS movements. Some time ago I was given a list of which Class 47s had been earmarked for ETCS fitment, including some examples operated by WCRC and LSL.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,170
And yet you specifically mention 37668 and 37669 which as WCRC locomotives are fairly regularly used on charter trains and their associated ECS movements.
I’m aware that 668 is still in regular use. What I wrote is that 668 and 669 have never operated service trains on the Cambrian lines following ETCS conversion.
Some time ago I was given a list of which Class 47s had been earmarked for ETCS fitment, including some examples operated by WCRC and LSL.
The Class 47 ETCS fitment currently falls under the ’Freight’ programme but to the best of my knowledge, WCRC and LSL do not yet have a contractual agreement for their 47s to be included.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,515
Location
Northampton
I’m aware that 668 is still in regular use. What I wrote is that 668 and 669 have never operated service trains on the Cambrian lines following ETCS conversion.
Although isn't that as much down to getting a path being next to impossible on the Cambrian?
As I understand, the ECML is going to move to in-cab signalling in the not too distant future. For me this begs the question- what will the effect be on railtours (and freight)? Will groups such as West Coast, Riviera Trains and all need to start installing the new equipment in cabs of old locos or will there still be colour light signalling available?
Going back to this, AIUI there will still be Colour-light signalling at Peterborough to accommodate freight moves to/from March. Freight running on the ECML south of Peterborough will presumably still need ETCS.

I am not sure if it would be possible for an ETCS-equipped loco to 'pilot' a non-ETCS equipped loco as required, although in theory it should be possible under Level 2 as long as the train braking data is known. If this is the case, a tour could run to London, attach a Loco at Wembley Yard (or other suitable location) and then be piloted over the ECML to Peterborough where the ETCS loco would detach and the tour continue.
 

Townsend Hook

Member
Joined
3 Aug 2011
Messages
932
Location
GB
I am not sure if it would be possible for an ETCS-equipped loco to 'pilot' a non-ETCS equipped loco as required, although in theory it should be possible under Level 2 as long as the train braking data is known. If this is the case, a tour could run to London, attach a Loco at Wembley Yard (or other suitable location) and then be piloted over the ECML to Peterborough where the ETCS loco would detach and the tour continue.
It happens regularly on the Cambrian line, with a Network Rail 97 piloting a non-ETCS 37, when double heading is required for reasons of having an ETS supply or extra grunt for moving the log trains.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,170
Although isn't that as much down to getting a path being next to impossible on the Cambrian?
I hear different stories from different people, but as you might be able to tell, I don't yet have a definitive answer! It's worth noting that WCRC has, in recent months, been crewing ECDP (East Coast Digital Programme) inspection saloon runs, which are typically hauled by 97302.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top