well, 140 + (125/2) = 202.5mph Maybe when 225's are retired, we could get a shortened rake with a 91 on each end, and see if a world record is possible with 50 year old stock?
That's not how it works. First of all, the structural integrity of any railway vehicle is only guaranteed up to the speed at which they were designed and manufactured to run at - in the case of IC225 vehicles this is 140mph.
Critically though, the speed at which engines can run is determined by their gearing*. Higher speed = greater distance between gears = lower rate of acceleration. This is 125mph in the case of Class 91s (which was reduced from the original spec of 140mph in favour of greater acceleration) and HST powercars.
*usually the actual top attainable speed (once you take off any physical restrictions) is a small amount more than their stated running speed, but for the sake of simplification...
In a HST formation, the two powercars are not each responsible for half of the 125mph top speed (if you were to chain together 2 road vehicles running at 70mph they wouldn't magically begin to run at 140mph). Quite frequently HSTs run around with one of the powercars isolated due to a fault (or less frequently without a second powercar at all). They are still able to reach 125mph, they just wont be able to get to that speed anywhere near as quickly as they would with 2 powercars.
For safety reasons alone, the top speed the 91+43 formations could run at was 125mph. Physically, they wouldn't have been able to achieve much more than this either. The factor which made them so impressive was their acceleration; since a 91 is designed to do all the work in getting to 125mph by itself (as they do day-to-day now, and very well at that), assisting it in any way with further power meant that it's acceleration went from "Very Good" to "Outstanding".