Teaboy1
Member
Hearty feed-up of being mugged in last 4 seconds with auto generated bids. Apart from uber hi bids, anyway of combating these auto last-minute.com bidding actions?? Or a case of cant beat 'em ... joint 'em ??
I once saw a standard set of Vauxhall 7 spoke allow wheels go for over £2,000 because 2 people who obviously wanted them both put stupid bids in a snipe program just to make sure and then one of them got stitched up!![]()
I'm not sure how much truth is in this anecdote
Back when you could see the usernames of the person bidding, someone would consistently snipe another users bids (exactly why they were ebay stalking I do not know) - so the losing bidder put their next maximum bid in at £2million for a small trinket (having agreed with the seller before hand to pay the maximum non snipe price if things went wrong) - the sniper sniped and won the item for £2,000,001
I see a lot of holes in the story personally.
I cant get a counter-bid in quick enough!
455driver:1611458 said:I cant get a counter-bid in quick enough!
Why not just put your highest bid in at the beginning?
I know of people who would get their mates and spouses to outbid someone if they weren't getting the price they wanted. One person I knew of got his mate to bid for an item as with an hour left it was on 99p. The bidder who was winning at 99p eventually paid £45 for the item simply down to the spoof bidding.
Someone at work got his mate to bid an item "up", guess what, the "mate" ended up as highest bidder, then had to pay for it, as per ebay rules.
Greater chance of being outbid/paying more than you might have done otherwise?
Still don't see this. If I'm prepared to pay £10 and no more for an item, that's what I put in as my max bid.
If someone wins it for £10.05, that's still 5p more than I wanted to pay, but less than their max.
Still don't see the point of sniping.
The next bid after 2million would have been a larger step than £1. I was bidding an item at £100, and the next minimum step was £5.
The bid step is a red herring.
If I see an item I want and it currently has a bid of 99p, then ebay requires I bid a minimum of £1.04. If I bid £45 and the previous highest bid is £25, then I might have a highest bid at £26, or something like that. However, if the winning bid came in at £45.01, then the winner would only pay £45.01, despite my bid of £45.
....The point is I'd much rather give someone one or two seconds to out-bid me than one or two minutes, hours or days. If I outbid them, they've got plenty more time to put in a higher bid. The reason I would always set a maximum bid of xx.01 or .05p is that if someone else has set a maximum bid of a nice round number (e.g. £10), then at the end of the auction my marginally higher bid should still win.
Hope that makes sense!!!
Only if they put a maximum bid of £45.01, if their maximum bid is higher it will go in a larger step. If your max bid is £45 and theirs is £50 it will probably bid them at £46 or £47 from experience.
I normally bid with a few minutes to go and will put unusual maximum bid amounts, for example £10.01 as will outbid the person who has put £10.00, without going much over, although as many people do this technique I now go for 8p over my maximum price. If two people put a max bid of £10, the person who put that £10 maximum bid first will win.
Personally, I think low prices encourage sniping, you are more likely to bid on something you perceive as being 'a better deal'. So the best way to discourage other bidders is bidding early. If your maximum bid really is your maximum bid, there really is no point in putting it off, you will either win, or you won't.
