Brilliant photos, this is looking MEGANew Hairmyres Station Friday & Sat Progress
Brilliant photos, this is looking MEGANew Hairmyres Station Friday & Sat Progress
NR have a standard double track footbridge design that they use as much as possible. It'll be cheaper to continue using that same modular design than to need to amend it for single track.the bridge in NR's picture looks to be double track capable. I understand it was never doubled beyond Busby.
Indeed - great to see rapid progress.Brilliant photos, this is looking MEGA
the bridge in NR's picture looks to be double track capable. I understand it was never doubled beyond Busby.


Class 321s operated in crew mode as well on both the WCML and parts of the GEML when they operated on those routes.Class 318, 320 or 321 units wouldn't be any use, they are DOO.
Just crossed the Fenwick Road bridge, all the new parapets are in place now.Correct. It just that I'm used to turning onto Kilmarnock Rd
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Station side parapet coping all in situ on Fenwick Rd side complete on Sunday 22 Sept
As someone who lives in Inverclyde I sincerely hope that doesn't happen. It wouldn't be the first time that this area has suffered with being given poorer stock to the benefit of somewhere else.However, there are loads of 380 or 385 diagrams to Wemyss Bay, Gourock, Paisley Canal, Neilston and Lanark. 318s or 320s could replace some of those which in turn could go to East Kilbride.
When was Busby junction remodeled? I wouldn't have thought the track was that old thereShort video update of track renewals at Busby Junction as well as the new Hairmyres footbridge being lowered into place.
The doubling of the junction in July 2013 entailed the installation of one new S&C unit and the removal of another. The other three units already in situ were unaffected, and it's these which have now been renewed.When was Busby junction remodeled? I wouldn't have thought the track was that old there
Wasn’t the old relay room demolished to make way for the revised layout?The doubling of the junction in July 2013 entailed the installation of one new S&C unit and the removal of another. The other three units already in situ were unaffected, and it's these which have now been renewed.
Yes, it was:Wasn’t the old relay room demolished to make way for the revised layout?






Bridge Decking going ON TOMORROW MORNING Tue 0100am. Some update photos
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Thornliebank Bridge Tuesday 08-10-2024 Todays Photos
That's a great photographic record - thank you!Bridge Decking going ON TOMORROW MORNING Tue 0100am. Some update photos
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Thornliebank Bridge Tuesday 08-10-2024 Todays Photos
Thanks for posting, but can you please edit the post to include a text description, for the benefit of anyone unable to view the photos (e.g. blind people). Thanks in advanceThornliebank Bridge Wednesday Photos

Unless I've grossly misunderstood, the plan appeared to be:Returning to the topic of whether SR have enough EMU's to run a full electric service once the EK line is electrified.... I reviewed information on Real Train Times to see the utilisation of EMUs in the morning and afternoon peaks from one day in October (full timetable). Overall (and if wiki is correct in SR having a total of 203 EMUs), there were 23 units not used in the morning peak and 27 not used in the afternoon/early evening peak. Drilling down to class 380s there were 5 unused in the morning and 3 in the afternoon. For 385s it was 9 and 12 respectively, 334s 4 and 6, 320s 4 and 6, and 318s 1 and zero respectively. It was a lot of info to plough through so I accept my data might not be 100% but close to it, plus this was a single day snapshot.
On the assumption that some classes can be moved around the network i.e. using 380s for EK with other units covering existing allocated patterns, and with the EK line requiring up to a maximum of 5 x 6 carriage EMUs (or perhaps a mixture of 3 and 6 carriages)?, does that leave the electrified line reliant on some mix of DMU + EMUs to run the existing timetable? Or can the current 203 EMU fleet support 100% EMUs on the EK line without compromising overall SR EMU resilience with respect to normal maintenance and back up units? Or would SR need to squeeze some existing EMU 6 carriage services down to 3?
Otherwise it's going to be pretty weird/bit of a PR embarrassment having DMUs running under the wires for a few years until whenever TS/SR get some new EMUs to replace the 318/320s....
Welcome thoughts from those more informed than me (I don't work in the industry).
It says ‘Class 156 units withdrawn’ which doesn’t fit with your assumption that they planned to retain some. I do agree that they appear to have dropped the ball on new EMU procurement.In the Transport Scotland Zero Emission Energy for Transport Report from 2022 it states for 2025 "Glasgow Central to East Kilbride, Some services use existing EMUs - Class 156 units withdrawn", so it appears they planned to retain some 156's on the route post electrification due to insufficient spare EMU's in the fleet. They should have tendered for the new EMU/BEMU fleets by now so if that had gone to plan once they arrived the last of the 156's on East Kilbride would be replaced I assume.