• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

East Coast seating plan wrong?

Status
Not open for further replies.

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,078
Location
Redcar
(Not sure where to put this so by all means move it!)

Right, according to this seating plan here on HSTs in first class according to that seating plan all the seats that are the 1 part of the 2+1 formation are arranged facing each other (apart from one which is for the disabled access seat). However when I travelled from Kirkcaldy to York last summer I sat in a seat that faced the seat back of the next seat and there were several like that in front of mine.

So a) Did I imagine that, b) Is there an HST set running around with a different internal layout to the seating plan or c) Is the seating plan wrong?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

googolplex

Member
Joined
28 Mar 2009
Messages
220
I'm aware the Mk.4 coaches have a number of individual airline seats, but I don't think the HSTs do. I'm not 100% sure though, which is frustrating as I was in first class on an EC HST only a few weeks ago!
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,078
Location
Redcar
I'm aware the Mk.4 coaches have a number of individual airline seats, but I don't think the HSTs do.

Which is what the seating plan tells us. However I'm not kidding last time I was in first class on a HST there were several individual airline seats, numbered somewhere in the 50s or 60s I can't remember exactly. I sat in one of them! So what's going on?
 

googolplex

Member
Joined
28 Mar 2009
Messages
220
So the little niggling part of me that said HSTs did have them and I sat in one was right! I assumed I'd got them muddled with Electras :oops:.

In coach L, I'm aware the disabled seat faces south, but seem to recall somebody near the end of the carriage facing North in an individual seat, so how are the seats laid out at that end?

Also, slightly off-topic, but does anybody know why the HSTs don't have the walk way switch sides, or indeed why the Mk.4s do?
 

rail-britain

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2007
Messages
4,102
There are anomolies as not all the First Class coaches can be arranged the same

Coach M
Seats 3 and 5 do not always face each other (facing north)
Seats 63 and 65 do not always face each other (facing south)

Coach L
Seats 64 and 65 do not always face each other (facing south)

A similar anomoly exists between Coaches M and K on a Mallard (IC225) set, with seats 1 to 10 offset in Coach K but an additional (unnumbered) seat in Coach M
 

silentone

Member
Joined
16 Mar 2010
Messages
283
I'm not sure about the poster above, no seat is un-numbered unless the plastic sticker has fallen off the wall.

All HST's have the same layout and all MK4's have the same layout, there are no 'anomalies'. Only the distance between the seats is the only varying factor. Usually the 3rd or 4th Single from the Toilet in K has very little leg room.


That seating plan is wrong and seems to have been designed around the old HST layout. I think the layout as you go into L is 4 single, 4 tables, 4 Single/Disabled.

Coach M on a MK4 also has a different layout from K as it once had the smoking area which are 7 seats at the London end.

When you book tickets you will be booked as requested, the seating plan above has been created as a guide to help you find your seat.
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
17,808
Location
Epsom
Also, slightly off-topic, but does anybody know why the HSTs don't have the walk way switch sides, or indeed why the Mk.4s do?


I don't know, but I have to say the aisle snaking like that in the middle of a carriage is neither very aesthetic to look at nor very convenient to move through.
 

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
9,761
Location
Central Belt
I don't know, but I have to say the aisle snaking like that in the middle of a carriage is neither very aesthetic to look at nor very convenient to move through.

It was to help people pass the trolley. Why it was not put on refurbished mk3s we will never know. Maybe they didn't want to lose another 4 seats per set.
 

Red Dragon

Member
Joined
2 Sep 2010
Messages
426
Location
Teddington
Had dinner on the 4pm out of EDB last year coming back to YRK and the dining area was set up on all tables up to the snake - so I assumed that was the reason for the "snake", as it gave a dining area and a seating area within the same carriage. Doh !
 

ChrisCooper

Established Member
Joined
7 Sep 2005
Messages
1,787
Location
Loughborough
The switch of the walkway side was on the Mk4 TFOs from the start and is unique to them. I presume the seat tracks would have had to be altered to either make a straight aisle on the Mk4s or kinked one on Mk3s, and it was decided not worth it.
 

brel york

Member
Joined
4 Feb 2011
Messages
653
Location
the plant
you wouldnt need to alter the seat track on a mk3 they are the same on every vehicle ,you would just alter you pedestal position on the seat
 

andylloyd

Member
Joined
19 Feb 2007
Messages
441
Location
Gateshead, Tyne & Wear
Seat reservations were not available on the 1N07(EMT Hire in).
Plenty of folk moaning etc etc. At least there were plenty of seats :)
Numbers etc etc dont match to the regular HST's but hey ho.
At York though some of EC's Revenue Mgt team were on-board jotting seat numbers down. Is this going to be a permanent hire in?
 

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
10,291
EC have signed to take one EMT HST, but it hasn't transferred permanently yet AFAIK
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top