• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Drivers doors on SWT 158s

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drsatan

Established Member
Joined
24 Aug 2009
Messages
1,887
Location
Land of the Sprinters
I've noticed on SWTs 158s that the passenger door adjacent to the drivers cab is now marked as 'emergency exit only' in the passenger saloon, meaning that there's only one door in the leading coach from which passengers can board or alight.

Is there a reason why this is the case? Apparently all units are supposed to have cab doors nowadays, and making the leading door of each 158 driver-only is a way around this.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

scotsman

Established Member
Joined
6 Jul 2010
Messages
3,252
The ex-SWT 158 up with ScR (789) doesn't have any of this
 

TheWalrus

Established Member
Joined
6 Oct 2008
Messages
2,069
Location
UK
Yes I was on a 159 yesterday and this happened. It's ridiculous, it makes dwell times longer by causing conjestion.
 

asylumxl

Established Member
Joined
12 Feb 2009
Messages
4,260
Location
Hiding in your shadow
Yes I was on a 159 yesterday and this happened. It's ridiculous, it makes dwell times longer by causing conjestion.

159S have no cab doors. How is it ridiculous? If a problem arises, the driver doesn't need to battle with passengers joining the service and their luggage/bikes.
 

ukrob

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2009
Messages
1,810
159S have no cab doors. How is it ridiculous? If a problem arises, the driver doesn't need to battle with passengers joining the service and their luggage/bikes.

Because there is lots of stock with no cab doors all over the country, including other operators 158s, which manage just fine.
 

asylumxl

Established Member
Joined
12 Feb 2009
Messages
4,260
Location
Hiding in your shadow
Because there is lots of stock with no cab doors all over the country, including other operators 158s, which manage just fine.

And to anyone but rail enthusiasts, it's not really an issue if the drivers door is out of use. Can't say I've ever heard someone moan cos they can't get in a 222s staff door...
 

Greenback

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
9 Aug 2009
Messages
15,268
Location
Llanelli
I don;t think it's a huge issue for anyone, including enthusiasts. It's more of a minor irritant if you don't realise it's not for public use and have to walk back down the train!

I'm all for drivers having unhindered access to cabs, but it seems a little weird that SWT class 158's are like this when there are so many 158's around where the door can be used.
 
Last edited:

Dreadnought

Member
Joined
1 Oct 2007
Messages
586
I wonder if this is related to the fact that if a driver needs to exit a 158 they open/close the door from within the cab, as I have witnessed a few times on Northern ones stopped at signal checks.

This could lead to issues, especially if the vestibule area is occupied, as there would be an unmanned open door whilst the driver is either exiting the cab or rentering the cab after climbing back onto the train.
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,692
Location
Northwich
I wonder if this is related to the fact that if a driver needs to exit a 158 they open/close the door from within the cab, as I have witnessed a few times on Northern ones stopped at signal checks.

So they actually open the door rather than just release the door from the cab and then use the open/close buttons?

When it happens on a 142 you usually have an open drivers door to the cab and an open door down to the track that's fully open to any passengers deciding to jump off or run in to the cab - not that I've ever seen anyone do that.
 

CarterUSM

Established Member
Joined
4 Jan 2010
Messages
2,495
Location
North Britain
I wonder if this is related to the fact that if a driver needs to exit a 158 they open/close the door from within the cab, as I have witnessed a few times on Northern ones stopped at signal checks.

This could lead to issues, especially if the vestibule area is occupied, as there would be an unmanned open door whilst the driver is either exiting the cab or rentering the cab after climbing back onto the train.



It shouldn't really be an issue, as long as the vestibule is checked and prior warning is given to anyone in the vicinity .
 

starrymarkb

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2009
Messages
5,985
Location
Exeter
Because there is lots of stock with no cab doors all over the country, including other operators 158s, which manage just fine.

It dates back to BR - Regional railways were happy to have the door unlocked, Network South East wanted it locked when the drivers key is in.
 

Dreadnought

Member
Joined
1 Oct 2007
Messages
586
So they actually open the door rather than just release the door from the cab and then use the open/close buttons?

Yes, they actually open the door from the cab and once trackside close it using the release mechanism at the bottom of the bodyside.
 

westcoaster

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2006
Messages
4,495
Location
DTOS A or B
The only reason I can see for this, is to mitigate the risk of someone falling from the door onto the third rail, thus this would be why it only affects SWT.
 

starrymarkb

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2009
Messages
5,985
Location
Exeter
Its more to do with Peak Loadings into Waterloo, the same was true for the 442s, leading door locked out. Its a Network South East thing that SWT have continued with. IIRC the 159s and 442s were the only power doored stock with an intercity layout under NSE - other areas may have been the same if NSE had continued.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,252
It dates back to BR - Regional railways were happy to have the door unlocked, Network South East wanted it locked when the drivers key is in.

I believe on the original 159s it was installed specifically because of the Salisbury - Exeter signalling system, which uses a specific form of tokenless block system on the singled sections, and it was agreed that the drivers would have the adjacent lobby to themselves in case they needed to get out to talk to a signaller.

Another story I've heard is that it was thought to be safer if the driver needed to go to an SPT in the third rail area.

Whatever the reason, the same system has been installed retorspectively on all SWT's 159/1 conversions and 158s.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top