I seriously doubt they will start checking up on you unless you are consistently late.
They are not looking at late but fatigue, if a driver has an incident and it is diiscovered they have lied or not been truthful at interview they will be personally liable
I have never known anybody to care because you make sure you get to work on time. Management do not care because these people are always on time, or at least there is no pattern of lateness which doesn't correlate to those who drive cars.
As above, it is fatigue not late on duty
Why worry? He has got this far. Telling someone to worry before an interview is hardly helpful. All he has to do is provide an assurance that he will get to work on time and stick to it.
He would not have to worry if he took your advice as if found out he would not get the job. I used to work at Brum and the journey time was 1 hr 45m from where I live I was never late on duty but I was well above the fatigue index.
This 45 mins thing is interesting, is this going to be a new standard coming in with the new driving license? Any idea when it is coming in? I wonder if grandfather rights are going to be negotiated and applied to staff who currently are employed on the assumption and understanding that they are upto 60 mins away.
There isn't a driving license, it is a competency pack and the competency structure is changing as well, this will be a new standard and it will completely shake up rostering as it isn't only the door to door times it is also breaks between unsociable hours shifts, continuous rostered driving etc, coming in over the next 2 years, garndfather rights will have to apply and I do not know how the TOC's will get round the problem unless the drivers living more than 45 minutes away have turns of duty that will ensure they do not break the new standard, maybe a different link? Time will tell. As for your comments on saying you will drive to work, why dont you say you will fly a helicopter, just take helecopter flying lessons, they will of course give you the job,
sorry mate but I totally dissagree with your post regarding saying you will drive but you do not own a car or have passed your test, as an interviewer myself if I checked this out I would tend to presume that the candidate was going to drive to work without a driving lisence and I certainly wouldn't give them the job, if a candidate said they were taking lessons I am afraid the risk of not passing the test would be too high and I also wouldn't give them the job..
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Well before I started learning I would be prepared to cycle... I doubt it's hard to find somewhere to rent within 45 mins of cycling for the depots I applied for. I still feel it will hold me back though.
If you rented somewhere that was within 45 minutes cycling you wouldn't have a problem, convincing the panel of this intention may not be so easy, get some evidence that your intention is to relocate and forget the driving thing altogether for now, if you tell them you will rent a place within 45 minutes, you are taking driving lessons and when you pass your test will revert back to your original home (if it is less than 45 mins drive) this will do you well at interview. Not only directed at Goldbm but many of the people on this forum some real duff advice if thrown arouns and many a candidate has failed interview taking duff advice, you can do as you like however please weigh up any advice first before acting on it.