Sorry for a slightly "ranty" thread, but I'm mildly irritated. Next month I have to make a journey to the Welsh Borders on a weekday. I am weighing up going by car or by train. I used to be a regular user of the West Coast Mainline back in the mid 2000s and enjoy the train journey. However, I was 50/50 regarding whether it was worth going by car or by train - I live in Kent and the journey by train would be Kent - London (Euston) - Crewe - Welsh Borders. The train journey would be slightly quicker and more enjoyable and relaxing. The journey by car would be cheaper (much cheaper if I take someone else with me) and a bit more flexible.
The suggested itinerary has a 39 minute wait at Crewe. I asked Avanti via Twitter whether, if I travelled on a first class ticket, could I wait in the first class lounge at Crewe. The answer was a simple "no" with no real explanation. Now, this is a relatively minor issue and won't "tip" me one way or another. However, I see this as rather symptomatic of a railway that doesn't really "do" customer service and being needlessly customer-unfriendly: my query was hardly an unreasonable one and it would hardly cost the railway anything to allow passengers to wait in their lounge. For people like me, who are finely balanced about whether to take the car or train, it is rather off-putting. There are other, more egregious, examples of when the railway is "customer unfriendly" but this one just seems petty. So, are the railway really that bothered about attracting passengers back onto its services?
The suggested itinerary has a 39 minute wait at Crewe. I asked Avanti via Twitter whether, if I travelled on a first class ticket, could I wait in the first class lounge at Crewe. The answer was a simple "no" with no real explanation. Now, this is a relatively minor issue and won't "tip" me one way or another. However, I see this as rather symptomatic of a railway that doesn't really "do" customer service and being needlessly customer-unfriendly: my query was hardly an unreasonable one and it would hardly cost the railway anything to allow passengers to wait in their lounge. For people like me, who are finely balanced about whether to take the car or train, it is rather off-putting. There are other, more egregious, examples of when the railway is "customer unfriendly" but this one just seems petty. So, are the railway really that bothered about attracting passengers back onto its services?