Many thanks for the responses everyone, and I know a lot more about train crew rosters and breaks now.
However, what I've read in the thread does rather circle me back to the decision that was made by Avanti control was stupid and the wrong call, and it's cost them tens of thousands of pounds in delay repay.
Does anyone scrutinise these decisions after the event? I noticed the word 'panicked' to describe their reaction upthread, so surely some review of decision making, as part of learning, must take place?
mods note - split from here
Avanti shenanigans at Preston again today 13/11
According to what I can see, 9S44 0633 Euston - Edinburgh arrived at Preston at 1006 (16 late) and was cancelled, due to late running train crew (YJ)(who were obviously still stuck somewhere between Carlisle & Preston due to the earlier problems) 9M50 was 91 late into Preston. Then, presumably...
No decision is 'stupid or wrong' to the person making a choice at a time with lots of pressure and multiple situations to deal with.
None of us on here know the background to what prompted that decision to be made.
Just because people on here do not agree with it, doesn't make it stupid or wrong.
Of course, with all 'incidents', and weather events there will always be an after action review, with people from across the TOC, including control taking part, they will go through the good, the bad and the ugly of that day.
Remember controllers sometime have seconds to make a choice, and yes, on occasions it can ultimately be a 'wrong' choice.
Last edited by a moderator:
