ChristopherJ
Repeatedly returning banned member
After the Talerddig collision this week, I've been wondering about lightweight units with disc brakes, such as the 158s that are infamous for poor braking performance in poor / autumn conditions.
According to driving experience, disc brakes are superior for brake retardation but do not scrub the wheel tyre of contamination that is prone to cause wheelslide.
Tread brakes are less efficient at brake retardation but are better for reducing wheelslide due to scrubbing the wheel tyre of contamination.
So, why don't trains use disc brakes as the primary braking source but have a secondary tread brake exclusively for wheel scrubbing only. Best of both worlds?
Basically, I'm suggesting we put a massive heavy duty sponge on the wheel of each unit to 'assist' the disc brakes by scrubbing the wheel tyre.
According to driving experience, disc brakes are superior for brake retardation but do not scrub the wheel tyre of contamination that is prone to cause wheelslide.
Tread brakes are less efficient at brake retardation but are better for reducing wheelslide due to scrubbing the wheel tyre of contamination.
So, why don't trains use disc brakes as the primary braking source but have a secondary tread brake exclusively for wheel scrubbing only. Best of both worlds?
Basically, I'm suggesting we put a massive heavy duty sponge on the wheel of each unit to 'assist' the disc brakes by scrubbing the wheel tyre.