Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
If a 25 year old buys a return ticket, valid for a month, using a 16-25 railcard, just before their 26th birthday, and the 16-25 railcard expires on or just after their 26th birthday, and they buy a 26-30 railcard then, would the return ticket be valid with the 26-30 card? If not, is there a workaround?
Or go to the ticket office before your return journey, explain the situation and they should be able to 'excess' your return journey to show the currently valid Railcard.
There are plenty of cases documented in the Disputes & Prosecutions section for using the wrong type of railcard, even if the price is the same. Of course, there are even more cases not documented where it isn’t a problem, but it’s not a risk I’d personally be willing to take.
There are plenty of cases documented in the Disputes & Prosecutions section for using the wrong type of railcard, even if the price is the same. Of course, there are even more cases not documented where it isn’t a problem, but it’s not a risk I’d personally be willing to take.
Is there? every example I can think of involves a situation where the passenger got more discount than they were actually entitled to. It would seem rather pointless for the railway to pursue a case where the correct fare was paid (even if in the wrong way). Obviously that doesn't mean it never happens!
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
There are plenty of cases documented in the Disputes & Prosecutions section for using the wrong type of railcard, even if the price is the same. Of course, there are even more cases not documented where it isn’t a problem, but it’s not a risk I’d personally be willing to take.
Is there? every example I can think of involves a situation where the passenger got more discount than they were actually entitled to. It would seem rather pointless for the railway to pursue a case where the correct fare was paid (even if in the wrong way). Obviously that doesn't mean it never happens!
A 16-25 railcard gives ever so slightly more discount in July and August (lack of minimum fare) but otherwise is pretty much exactly the same. I can’t see any ticket inspector prying an eye over a 16-25 ticket being used with a 26-30 railcard.
A 16-25 railcard gives ever so slightly more discount in July and August (lack of minimum fare) but otherwise is pretty much exactly the same. I can’t see any ticket inspector prying an eye over a 16-25 ticket being used with a 26-30 railcard.
Are you familiar with the song 'There's a hole in my bucket'?
The same problem of a ticket valid outward with one Railcard but the passenger no longer being entitled to that Railcard for the return journey will apply again.
Are you familiar with the song 'There's a hole in my bucket'?
The same problem of a ticket valid outward with one Railcard but the passenger no longer being entitled to that Railcard for the return journey will apply again.
Genuine single leg pricing, i.e. halving the affordably priced return tickets, and not abolishing (Super) Off Peak tickets, or putting up the cost of a return journey, would absolutely be a win for passengers.
However, I don't believe that is currently planned to happen.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Or go to the ticket office before your return journey, explain the situation and they should be able to 'excess' your return journey to show the currently valid Railcard.
Good luck with that. I never had any success trying to get a ticket discounted with one type of Railcard zero-excessed into a ticket with a different type of Railcard.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Is there? I’d be inclined to agree with @Trainbike46 here:
A 16-25 railcard gives ever so slightly more discount in July and August (lack of minimum fare) but otherwise is pretty much exactly the same. I can’t see any ticket inspector prying an eye over a 16-25 ticket being used with a 26-30 railcard.
I agree, except there are perhaps a very small number who might.
There was at least one particularly strict individual (most notably strict with railway staff / PRIV holders) on LNER who I could imagine being unhappy about this, however I've not heard any recent stories involving him, so maybe he has mellowed.
I could imagine some revenue protection officers, particularly for companies like GTR, some of whom show no mercy and no sign of applying common sense, also not liking it.
The rail industry really should have policies in place to deal with issues like this, and ensure that overzealous staff don't feel emboldened to act inappropriately in such situations.
Without knowing the exact journey, it's difficult to give the best possible advice.
I could imagine some revenue protection officers, particularly for companies like GTR, some of whom show no mercy and no sign of applying common sense, also not liking it.
Indeed I recently heard someone being Penalty Fared on a GTR service for using a Senior Railcard discounted ticket when they 'only' had a Freedom Pass. Obviously not quite the same but it's the kind of thing I'd expect them to show discretion for as it's an understandable mistake to make if you don't travel often by train.
Indeed I recently heard someone being Penalty Fared on a GTR service for using a Senior Railcard discounted ticket when they 'only' had a Freedom Pass. Obviously not quite the same but it's the kind of thing I'd expect them to show discretion for as it's an understandable mistake to make if you don't travel often by train.
There has been at least one case that has come to our notice where someone was given a Penalty Fare for applying the wrong Railcard to a ticket, when they held a valid (different) Railcard which gave exactly the same discount as the one inadvertantly applied.
Good luck with that. I never had any success trying to get a ticket discounted with one type of Railcard zero-excessed into a ticket with a different type of Railcard.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Paddington to Taunton return.
The 16-25 railcard is a 3 year one which expires just after 26th birthday, and the return journey straddles the expiry date.
Thanks for all the comments, perhaps the most pragmatic solution is to buy a 26-30 railcard on 26th birthday which would solve the problem I suppose.
On another note, can you buy a16-25 railcard the day before 26th birthday and have it valid till day before 27th birthday? I seem to remember that was allowed for Family Railcards, I.e. buying the day before a child's 16th birthday?
And are there 3 year 26-30 railcards available?
I would buy a 16-25 the day before your 26th birthday rather than a 26-30 the day after since the 16-25 is very slightly better and can be got on plastic rather than being digital only.
We are aware of an issue with emails from the Forum to Microsoft-based email accounts (hotmail/outlook/live.com email addresses). This is being looked into currently, thanks for your patience meanwhile.