• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Difference in Pricing

Status
Not open for further replies.

joke2711

Member
Joined
7 Oct 2013
Messages
275
I have just had work purchase a ticket for London to Wirral on 28th April 2016.

The cost of the advance 1st - London to Hoylake ... £141
The cost of the advance 1st - London to Liverpool ... £108

The cost of a Liverpool - Hoylake ticket ... £3.95

That's one hell of a difference to travel on the same train!
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

dquebec

Member
Joined
20 Dec 2015
Messages
96
Location
Sheffield
Liverpool Stns and Hoylake are in the same fare "zone" or "cluster" for Virgin Advance Tickets, so the fares are identical.

It seems to be an availability issue rather than a higher fare applying.
 

joke2711

Member
Joined
7 Oct 2013
Messages
275
Liverpool Stns and Hoylake are in the same fare "zone" or "cluster" for Virgin Advance Tickets, so the fares are identical.

It seems to be an availability issue rather than a higher fare applying.


No fares are always different ... usually only be a £1
it can't be an availability issue as Virgin are carrying me on the same train.

It is the 1807 service from EUS in this instance
 

greatkingrat

Established Member
Joined
20 Jan 2011
Messages
3,292
Are you sure it was £141? I can see Advance 1st fares for London - Hoylake of £121 and £146 but nothing in between.
 

Merseysider

Established Member
Fares Advisor
Joined
22 Jan 2014
Messages
5,627
Location
Birmingham
Was it a ticket from London Terminals or from a specific station in the London area?
 

joke2711

Member
Joined
7 Oct 2013
Messages
275
Are you sure it was £141? I can see Advance 1st fares for London - Hoylake of £121 and £146 but nothing in between.

Sorry it was £140 something so £146 is probably right ... it was the price difference that amuses me ...
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Was it a ticket from London Terminals or from a specific station in the London area?

The search was undertaken on the Virgin website with the start point as London Euston.
 

joke2711

Member
Joined
7 Oct 2013
Messages
275
Just run the query again ... screen shots attached
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2016-04-15 19.56.01.jpg
    Screenshot 2016-04-15 19.56.01.jpg
    71.9 KB · Views: 51
  • Screenshot 2016-04-15 19.56.47.jpg
    Screenshot 2016-04-15 19.56.47.jpg
    67.2 KB · Views: 46

MikeWh

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
15 Jun 2010
Messages
8,565
Location
Crayford
It seems to be an availability issue rather than a higher fare applying.

Could it be the difference between VT only and VT & Connections? In the past I've found that the cheapest tiers are only available without connections.
 

Paul Kelly

Verified Rep - BR Fares
Joined
16 Apr 2010
Messages
4,227
Location
Reading
No fares are always different ... usually only be a £1
it can't be an availability issue as Virgin are carrying me on the same train.
It can be an availability issue - we have seen this on the forum with fares to Merseyside stations before. The £108 fare is a "VIRGINWESTCOAST"-routed fare - only valid on Virgin Trains. The £146 one is routed "VTWC &CONNECTNS" - also valid on Merseyrail and possibly Northern, EMT and TPE too depending on where you change, probably also on London Midland and Arriva Trains Wales (I haven't checked the permitted routes thoroughly).

It seems to me that sometimes Virgin have better availability of advance fares where the whole price of the fare goes to them, rather than for "& connections" fares where they have to share some of the revenue (even if only a very small portion) with another TOC. Of course, the price difference here is completely unjustifiable, but I think it can be explained by different availability for fares where Virgin keeps all the revenue compared to fares where they have to share it.

Edit: MikeWh got there before me!
 

joke2711

Member
Joined
7 Oct 2013
Messages
275
It can be an availability issue - we have seen this on the forum with fares to Merseyside stations before. The £108 fare is a "VIRGINWESTCOAST"-routed fare - only valid on Virgin Trains. The £146 one is routed "VTWC &CONNECTNS" - also valid on Merseyrail and possibly Northern, EMT and TPE too depending on where you change, probably also on London Midland and Arriva Trains Wales (I haven't checked the permitted routes thoroughly).

It seems to me that sometimes Virgin have better availability of advance fares where the whole price of the fare goes to them, rather than for "& connections" fares where they have to share some of the revenue (even if only a very small portion) with another TOC. Of course, the price difference here is completely unjustifiable, but I think it can be explained by different availability for fares where Virgin keeps all the revenue compared to fares where they have to share it.

Edit: MikeWh got there before me!

it would be interesting to know what percentage Virgin will give to the other Operators then ...
 

crehld

Established Member
Joined
1 Nov 2014
Messages
1,994
Location
Norfolk
It may be worth the OP trying another website. Normally I wouldn't think it to be an issue, but I only suggest this because I spent ages this morning trying to book a reasonably priced ticket from Inverness to Crewe using Virgin's website (wanting to make use of the seat selector) but kept receiving a message saying it was having trouble connecting to the national reservations database and therefore could not offer all available advance fares - I went to another website instead which had no such problems.
 

otter11

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2016
Messages
132
It may be worth the OP trying another website. Normally I wouldn't think it to be an issue, but I only suggest this because I spent ages this morning trying to book a reasonably priced ticket from Inverness to Crewe using Virgin's website (wanting to make use of the seat selector) but kept receiving a message saying it was having trouble connecting to the national reservations database and therefore could not offer all available advance fares - I went to another website instead which had no such problems.

There was definitely an issue this morning as both ScotRail and National Rail were having issues connecting to the reservations database. Not sure exactly what the problem was, but all seems fine now...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top