• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

DfT station categories - and which stations need changes to their category

Status
Not open for further replies.

eth72419

New Member
Joined
4 Dec 2024
Messages
2
Location
Bushey, Hertsmere
Hiya all -
This morning, I was looking at the Wikipedia page for the DfT station categories, and I noticed that they haven't been updated in the last decade. Obviously, this means that some stations often fall beyond the criteria for their letter (e.g. Acton Main Line and Bushey).

Do these categories have any meaningful impact? Maybe more funding/attention to these stations? If so, which stations do you think need changing the most?

Bye!
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

eth72419

New Member
Joined
4 Dec 2024
Messages
2
Location
Bushey, Hertsmere
100% it seems like is real. It was last updated in 2009. In 2009, Bushey had about 491,100 entries/exits (well over the 'under 0.25 million' required for a cat E station. This is the same with other stations like Acton Main Line. However, other stations like Stroud are cat D for this time despite having less patronage than both.

Not sure of the influence though!
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,274
Is this categorisation a real thing? What is the purpose? What does it mean for the station
Would you like to see a copy of the 2009 report where the reasoning is explained?

The categories were already around, (maybe only used by DfT), but the 2009 report moved some stations between existing categories.
 

Attachments

  • Stations report DfT copy.pdf
    3.4 MB · Views: 48

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,916
Location
Fenny Stratford
Would you like to see a copy of the 2009 report where the reasoning is explained
Thanks - I have read the report previously. Other than giving enthusiasts another classification to talk about I ask what practical outcomes has this report has driven?

What has changed? What has been improved? What have we bought for the money? What tangible benefit, beyond a pointless entry in wiki, has been delivered?

How does knowing my station is "f2" and Bletchley is "c2 "have any impact on my day? My view is that it doesn't and this whole thing is a pointless waste of time
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,274
Thanks - I have read the report previously. Other than giving enthusiasts another classification to talk about I ask what practical outcomes has this report has driven?

What has changed? What has been improved? What have we bought for the money? What tangible benefit, beyond a pointless entry in wiki, has been delivered?

How does knowing my station is "f2" and Bletchley is "c2 "have any impact on my day? My view is that it doesn't and this whole thing is a pointless waste of time
I think it was probably originally intended for internal use only, and adding it to Wikipedia was never necessary or that helpful.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
8,257
Hiya all -
This morning, I was looking at the Wikipedia page for the DfT station categories, and I noticed that they haven't been updated in the last decade. Obviously, this means that some stations often fall beyond the criteria for their letter (e.g. Acton Main Line and Bushey).

Do these categories have any meaningful impact? Maybe more funding/attention to these stations? If so, which stations do you think need changing the most?

Bye!
The categories had a substantial updated a few years ago but I'm not sure the recategorisation results were made public. I think it may have been ~20% recatogeorised.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top