• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Derby-Birmingham SVR not shown on TVM at Derby

Status
Not open for further replies.

Skymonster

Established Member
Joined
7 Feb 2012
Messages
2,070
Any idea why the TVMs at Derby are not offering the £22.70 SVR to Birmingham at 14:00 (intended train at 14:10) and are only showing the more expensive £24.30 SDR?

SVR is not valid before 09:30 Mon-Fri but has no evening restrictions.

I’ve noticed this twice in the last week but the ticket office has sold the cheaper fare unbidden on both occasions. What am I doing wrong?IMG_4815.jpeg
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,409
Any idea why the TVMs at Derby are not offering the £22.70 SVR to Birmingham at 14:00 (intended train at 14:10) and are only showing the more expensive £24.30 SDR?
I think that the interface of S&B machines requires you to choose between a day return and a period return at an earlier stage.

It doesn't treat a period return as also being useable as a day return.
 

Skymonster

Established Member
Joined
7 Feb 2012
Messages
2,070
It doesn't treat a period return as also being useable as a day return
Well that‘s a bit carp then - but your explanation sort of makes sense based on how the interface works. I wonder how many people have paid a bit over the odds because it doesn’t show an Offpeak Return where they might expect to find it?
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,409
Well that‘s a bit carp then - but your explanation sort of makes sense based on how the interface works. I wonder how many people have paid a bit over the odds because it doesn’t show an Offpeak Return where they might expect to find it?
Yes, it is a bit unhelpful, even if set up that way with the best of intentions.
 

Skymonster

Established Member
Joined
7 Feb 2012
Messages
2,070
I wouldn’t describe it is deliberate miss-selling, but its certainly not displaying / offerlng the cheapest fare that meets the passenger’s requirements. If I select “day return” I would then expect to be presented with the [cheapest] fares that enable me to travel out and back the same day, irrespective of the validity of the ticket extending beyond that day or not. Realistically Derby-Birmingham return is a popular flow that is very likely to be completed in a single day. Fortunately I knew what I expected to pay and thus didn’t accept the fare that the ticket machine was offering - plenty of others, I suspect, may be mislead and pay more than is necessary. This sort of mis-representation / potential over-charging is the sort of issue that advocacy groups for passenger rights should be lobbying to get fixed.
 

robbeech

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2015
Messages
4,914
Do we have anyone here that could look into this?

I know there are people that deal with ticket machines from other operators such as LNER and Northern, and I know we have some excellent EMR staff here.

I’d agree it’s not going to be a deliberate attempt to extort more cash from people providing it DOES show the SVR when you state you want to return at a later date (have you checked this?) but overall it is rather poor to not offer a perfectly valid ticket.
 

AdamWW

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2012
Messages
6,040
I’d agree it’s not going to be a deliberate attempt to extort more cash from people providing it DOES show the SVR when you state you want to return at a later date (have you checked this?) but overall it is rather poor to not offer a perfectly valid ticket.

Maybe I've being unreasonable but I can't see how it is in any way acceptable.

It's failing to sell a cheaper ticket that would be valid for the journey that has been selected.

Just because it's probably not deliberate doesn't make it OK in my book.
 

fandroid

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2014
Messages
2,570
Location
Hampshire
It's driven by the amazingly good value of the ADR. It gives great savings on a day trip if travelling before 09.30.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,594
Location
Yorkshire
I think that the interface of S&B machines requires you to choose between a day return and a period return at an earlier stage.

It doesn't treat a period return as also being useable as a day return.
That is correct. I saw this today.

CrossCountry (XC) got rid of the Off Peak Day Return (CDR) from Derby to Birmingham, so the cheapest return now is the period return product. The issue does not occur for journeys such as Nottingham to Birmingham, where XC still have CDRs (for now.... but don't be surprised if they remove them too!)

TPE did similar with many journeys, notably journeys to/from Huddersfield.

As CDRs are not regulated fares, there is nothing to stop TOCs getting rid of them.

TOCs hate Off Peak Return (SVR) fares because they are deemed to be "too cheap" (despite actually being too expensive for most people, who would drive instead of paying the fares demanded) however most SVRs are regulated by Government, so TOCs can't get rid of them, at least not yet...

The TVM software should be amended to show period return products, where they are cheaper than the lowest priced valid day return product.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Maybe I've being unreasonable but I can't see how it is in any way acceptable.

It's failing to sell a cheaper ticket that would be valid for the journey that has been selected.

Just because it's probably not deliberate doesn't make it OK in my book.
There is a very long list of things that the rail industry does that is not acceptable. Unfortunately, it is very difficult to do much about it. It's not a level playing field; train companies can much more easily persecute passengers who they accuse of underpaying.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,594
Location
Yorkshire
Well I replied to a comment suggesting it was "rather poor".

That to me implies acceptable but not ideal.
I don't think I've heard anyone describe poor as being considered acceptable (until now)!

Edit: and for clarification, I don't think the prefix "rather" makes it acceptable either, but let's get back on topic!
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top