Indeed the first paragraph is irrelevant to an appeal under 16(3)(a).
Please look up the references I gave and then quote some of the relevant words directly. Don't assume the people reading the appeal already know and understand the regulations - we often (usually!) find they don't!
Here's an example appeal - https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/stansted-airport-fines.253779/post-6421189
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
For (1) and (2) only mention what the regulations required to be on the notice and state the errors. Don't speculate about *why* the wrong thing was written - it just gives them reasons to misinterpret your appeal, something we often see happening.
So in (1) there should be no mention of Headingley whatsover.
In (2) there should be no mention of Anytime Single or 29.40. Simply the correct fare and the fact it doesn't match the notice.
Please look up the references I gave and then quote some of the relevant words directly. Don't assume the people reading the appeal already know and understand the regulations - we often (usually!) find they don't!
Here's an example appeal - https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/stansted-airport-fines.253779/post-6421189
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
For (1) and (2) only mention what the regulations required to be on the notice and state the errors. Don't speculate about *why* the wrong thing was written - it just gives them reasons to misinterpret your appeal, something we often see happening.
So in (1) there should be no mention of Headingley whatsover.
In (2) there should be no mention of Anytime Single or 29.40. Simply the correct fare and the fact it doesn't match the notice.