The issues with clearance are all on the branch, the main route was all double track so there wouldn't be any insurmountable problem.Although an agree with the majority of what you’re saying, I think a handful is a fairly major exaggeration. You just have to look at GWR’s network to see that. Between Reading and Taunton, Newport and Worcester the majority of long distance route have diversionary routes, and the same goes for the ‘middle’ section of a lot of long distance routes.
However these diversionary routes all exist on the basis that they are justified routes with services running anyways. The railway is already being deemed to cost too much money, we cannot build empty routes and maintain them just to use every now and then.
As an aside, on the proposals from this thread on reopening the line from Okehampton, regardless of already mentioned bridge issues, using it for diversion would be totally impractical, because of both the double reversal at Exeter and Plymouth, but also because I am totally unconvinced an IET could be cleared, especially if it linked with the Gunislake branch, which already has issues with coach length around the bends on a 150.
Apart from it's completely unnecessary of course. There's far better ways to spend £1bn on the railways in Devon than rebuilding Okehampton-Plymouth
