• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Damn that 50!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

16CSVT2700

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2005
Messages
1,837
Location
Gdansk
Failures happen dear even to preserved locos as well-maintained as 50049.

Presumably the part that failed had always given trouble to the class so it's nothing new. It was an easy fix and was done in the time it takes to unscrew 8 bolts, remove, replace and re-screw the bolts in 8).

Nice pics tho mate
 

trains2

Member
Joined
30 Jun 2005
Messages
315
Location
Winchester
Failures happen dear even to preserved locos as well-maintained as 50049.

Presumably the part that failed had always given trouble to the class so it's nothing new. It was an easy fix and was done in the time it takes to unscrew 8 bolts, remove, replace and re-screw the bolts in 8).

Nice pics tho mate

I'm not really blaming the 50, I blaming the fact that they completely cancelled the tour, even though they had a recuse loco ready to continue on with the tour. Feel sorry for the punters who were on it.
 

Coxster

Established Member
Joined
9 Jun 2005
Messages
9,243
Nice shots mate. Particuarly like the shot of 'the beast' and a Voyager side-by-side.
 

16CSVT2700

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2005
Messages
1,837
Location
Gdansk
I'm not really blaming the 50, I blaming the fact that they completely cancelled the tour, even though they had a recuse loco ready to continue on with the tour. Feel sorry for the punters who were on it.
That is true there though 47853 was required on a different tour so another 47 would have been needed. I spose it was easier to can the 50 tour and get the 47 back to where it was needed than to run the 50 tour with the 47 and thus making the tour the 47 was booked on extremely late.
 

richa2002

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2005
Messages
2,298
I'm not really blaming the 50, I blaming the fact that they completely cancelled the tour, even though they had a recuse loco ready to continue on with the tour. Feel sorry for the punters who were on it.
No-one has realised that the 50 and stock had to go to Poole (for 2 hours 27 mins) to get serviced but seeing as that class 47 started moving the train two hours late, it would have had no time to get serviced and it would have been a complete cock up with no water in the toilets or the kitchen.
 
T

Tom

Guest
I am sure they'd [the punters] much rather have a through running tour running a bit late rather than a caped tour.
 

richa2002

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2005
Messages
2,298
I am sure they'd [the punters] much rather have a through running tour running a bit late rather than a caped tour.
What with no toilets and maybe no hot drinks/food, I don't think people in the Pullmans would be too happy after paying an arm and a leg.
 
T

Tom

Guest
Had the 47 run through to Poole (and had about a 30 min wait there, which is all what is really required) it'd have just run in the same path an hour later on the return.
 

richa2002

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2005
Messages
2,298
Had the 47 run through to Poole (and had about a 30 min wait there, which is all what is really required) it'd have just run in the same path an hour later on the return.
I guess it was operationally too difficult. Never mind, I'm not complaining, I got two shots of 50049 and one of 47853...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top