DaleCooper
Established Member
What is the point of this discussion?
cadoxton provided the correct answer and the reasoning behind it, it was quite clear that it was a second attempt so the use of double post would make no difference. cadoxton could easily have deleted the first attempt but, being honest, did not. Most importantly the setter (me) accepted the answer, perhaps I should have said "Correct but you've cheated so we'll have to wait for someone else to give the same answer".
What next, are we going to disallow vexatious posts like Newhaven Marine?
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
...or sanctions against those who haven't set a question more than two days after being given the floor:
http://www.railforums.co.uk/showthread.php?p=2515098#post2515098
cadoxton provided the correct answer and the reasoning behind it, it was quite clear that it was a second attempt so the use of double post would make no difference. cadoxton could easily have deleted the first attempt but, being honest, did not. Most importantly the setter (me) accepted the answer, perhaps I should have said "Correct but you've cheated so we'll have to wait for someone else to give the same answer".
What next, are we going to disallow vexatious posts like Newhaven Marine?
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
...or sanctions against those who haven't set a question more than two days after being given the floor:
http://www.railforums.co.uk/showthread.php?p=2515098#post2515098
