• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Crossrail - Through Running confirmed for November

Status
Not open for further replies.

Thirteen

Established Member
Joined
3 Oct 2021
Messages
1,899
Location
London
I wonder if we'll see Bond Street open next month? I know they've said before November 6th but that's quite vague. My guess is Monday 30th October.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Acton1991

Member
Joined
20 Jan 2019
Messages
390
Still disappointing at the 7 minute dwell outside of Paddington. Seems like a bit of a step backwards with customers on the train wondering what is going on
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
11,003
Location
London
Still disappointing at the 7 minute dwell outside of Paddington. Seems like a bit of a step backwards with customers on the train wondering what is going on

Temporary until May 2023. Needs to marry up with a major timetable change and the full 24tph and it won't be arranged for the December one. I'm sure they'll be mitigations for passengers; Reading trains often arrive early waiting a platform into Paddington already and 7 minutes is very much a maximum.

It's a bit of a bodged timetable, but its still better than currently assuming that through running doesn't turn into a GTR-2018-style fiasco; that was mainly due to driver route knowledge, which isn't an issue here though.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
12,869
Location
Cambridge
I just arrived at my Heathrow hotel ten minutes ago, after travelling from Liverpool Street. I must say I still won’t be taking the Elizabeth line as a through service to the airport for as long as the Heathrow Express is running.

After an absolutely knackering day it was a huge pleasure to change from the Elizabeth line onto the Express, the fact I was at my hotel while the 345 I would have taken was only just leaving Hayes emphasises why the convenience of the fast, easy and frequent Express to Terminal 5 outweighs the convenience of not having to change at Paddington.

Of course, those coming from the Shenfield branch - including Stratford - will have to change regardless, although without stairs I appreciate if they stay with TfL.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
11,003
Location
London
I just arrived at my Heathrow hotel ten minutes ago, after travelling from Liverpool Street. I must say I still won’t be taking the Elizabeth line as a through service to the airport for as long as the Heathrow Express is running.

After an absolutely knackering day it was a huge pleasure to change from the Elizabeth line onto the Express, the fact I was at my hotel while the 345 I would have taken was only just leaving Hayes emphasises why the convenience of the fast, easy and frequent Express to Terminal 5 outweighs the convenience of not having to change at Paddington.

Of course, those coming from the Shenfield branch - including Stratford - will have to change regardless, although without stairs I appreciate if they stay with TfL.

So you've save about 10 minutes for how much extra cost?

You've also said the benefit is speed, and it was a "pleasure to change" even though in the through service the extra time of changing will probably mean you'd get there at the same time.

So none of the benefit, all of the cost. There will be no "outweighing convenience" in the next stage, so your post is a little contradictory.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
12,869
Location
Cambridge
So you've save about 10 minutes for how much extra cost?

You've also said the benefit is speed, and it was a "pleasure to change" even though in the through service the extra time of changing will probably mean you'd get there at the same time.

So none of the benefit, all of the cost. There will be no "outweighing convenience" in the next stage, so your post is a little contradictory.
I get a lot from the train being non-stop as well. It’s very tedious for me to stop at Acton and Hanwell and all and sundries. Just personal preference, I’m sure.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,844
I get a lot from the train being non-stop as well. It’s very tedious for me to stop at Acton and Hanwell and all and sundries. Just personal preference, I’m sure.
Yes, but that is now with no through running, so you had to go upstairs regardless.

In the new world, let's say you get 1948 EL from Liverpool Street to Paddington, arriving 2000. You then have a choice of:
- Staying on the train you're on and get to Heathrow T2/3 at 2034
- Or going upstairs at Padd and getting the 2010 HEx, arriving T2/3 at 2025.

From what you're saying you'd get off a train going where you want to go and paying a higher fare for another train after making work for yourself by going upstairs. So you end up having more risk in your journey and paying more - for 9 minutes potential benefit. I suspect the vast majority of people would just stay on the EL service!
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
11,003
Location
London
I get a lot from the train being non-stop as well. It’s very tedious for me to stop at Acton and Hanwell and all and sundries. Just personal preference, I’m sure.

Sure, but I think with through running from somewhere like Liverpool Street and taking into account the time taken for changing and let's say an average of a 7.5 minute wait for Heathrow Express, the time penalty is going to be very small even if it may seem it by not-stopping anywhere. Not to mention the cost of Heathrow Express and the (potentially mild) inconvenience of that change with luggage, overall it doesn't seem sensible to me.
 

ijmad

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2016
Messages
1,856
Location
UK
Assuming we start the clock when you board the train at Liverpool Street and stop it when you step off at Heathrow T2/3:

Liverpool Street to Heathrow T2/3 via XR = 40 minutes

Liverpool Street to Heathrow T2/3 via HX = 11 minutes Liverpool St to Paddington, 10 minute change at Paddington (reasonable with luggage), average 7.5 minute wait for HX, 15 minute journey from Paddington to Heathrow. That's just over 40 minutes.

So it's not actually quicker to change for HX, unless you're fast at changing (which is an ask with bulky luggage) or lucky with the HX timings.

Or perhaps if you want to go to T5 and the next Elizabeth Line service there is some time away, but that's still a high cost vs just changing to the HX for T5 at T2/3 for free.
 

miklcct

Established Member
Joined
2 May 2021
Messages
5,017
Location
Cricklewood
Assuming we start the clock when you board the train at Liverpool Street and stop it when you step off at Heathrow T2/3:

Liverpool Street to Heathrow T2/3 via XR = 40 minutes

Liverpool Street to Heathrow T2/3 via HX = 11 minutes Liverpool St to Paddington, 10 minute change at Paddington (reasonable with luggage), average 7.5 minute wait for HX, 15 minute journey from Paddington to Heathrow. That's just over 40 minutes.

So it's not actually quicker to change for HX, unless you're fast at changing (which is an ask with bulky luggage) or lucky with the HX timings.

Or perhaps if you want to go to T5 and the next Elizabeth Line service there is some time away, but that's still a high cost vs just changing to the HX for T5 at T2/3 for free.
This calculation assumes that the first XR train at Liverpool Street is a Heathrow service, which may not be the case.

If the next train to Heathrow is some time away, it may well be better to get to Paddington first and wait for an HX.
 

greatkingrat

Established Member
Joined
20 Jan 2011
Messages
3,298
The actual timings from Paddington to Heathrow Central will be (repeated every 15 minutes)
XR - dep xx02, arr xx30
HX - dep xx10, arr xx25

So you would have to make the change in less than 8 minutes which is possible, but hardly seems worth the effort (and cost)
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
11,003
Location
London
The actual timings from Paddington to Heathrow Central will be (repeated every 15 minutes)
XR - dep xx02, arr xx30
HX - dep xx10, arr xx25

So you would have to make the change in less than 8 minutes which is possible, but hardly seems worth the effort (and cost)

Certainly possible if you are fit and healthy and perhaps without luggage; I've made connections in 4-5 minutes, but it's a very brisk walk.
 

matt_world2004

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2014
Messages
4,581
I just arrived at my Heathrow hotel ten minutes ago, after travelling from Liverpool Street. I must say I still won’t be taking the Elizabeth line as a through service to the airport for as long as the Heathrow Express is running.

After an absolutely knackering day it was a huge pleasure to change from the Elizabeth line onto the Express, the fact I was at my hotel while the 345 I would have taken was only just leaving Hayes emphasises why the convenience of the fast, easy and frequent Express to Terminal 5 outweighs the convenience of not having to change at Paddington.

Of course, those coming from the Shenfield branch - including Stratford - will have to change regardless, although without stairs I appreciate if they stay with TfL.
From Liverpool Street when through running starts Elizabeth line will almost certainly be quicker

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

This calculation assumes that the first XR train at Liverpool Street is a Heathrow service, which may not be the case.

If the next train to Heathrow is some time away, it may well be better to get to Paddington first and wait for an HX.
Likewise you could get to paddington and wait 15 mins for a hex. Or you could wait 15 mins for a same platform interchange at paddington crossrail. . in most circumstances a Liverpool Street service it would be quicker waiting for the el
 
Joined
22 Jun 2013
Messages
603
This calculation assumes that the first XR train at Liverpool Street is a Heathrow service, which may not be the case.

If the next train to Heathrow is some time away, it may well be better to get to Paddington first and wait for an HX.
I think most people will be concerned with cost over a 9 minute time difference. A non advance single on HX is £25 compared to £10-£12 for EL.

There are 'from £5.50' advance tickets on HX but I'm not sure how many are available and how long in advance they need to purchased. Seems to be an £18 fare available for mid-October so you'd need to be well organised to get any discount.
 
Last edited:

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
9,793
Location
Central Belt
I am looking forward to it never using HEX again. It will be train an error to find the best combination for my journey.

At the moment it is HeX - Circle - Kings Cross (onwards to WGC)

I often think I would be better on the Piccadilly line, as the HeX gets you into Paddington well, but then it is a lottery afterwards.

Now I have choices, Change at Farringdon (when the service runs) or Moorgate. Will it be quicker? Maybe. But will it be nicer, certainly paying the HeX premium to stand is an insult. However with that last point in mind I really think the route will soon be chronically overcrowded to the extent that people are unable to board (like the risk of using the Piccadilly line) and it isn't frequent enough just to take the next train.
 

Mag_seven

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
1 Sep 2014
Messages
12,000
Location
here to eternity
A reminder that this thread is for discussion of Crossrail through running from November. If anyone wants to discuss anything else then please start a new thread. I have moved some posts speculating about the future of HEX to this thread:

 

TheDon88

Member
Joined
18 Nov 2014
Messages
19
Location
Tottenham, London
It looks like Bond Street will open on Monday 24th October 2022. This date was reported by BBC London in their bulletins during BBC Breakfast this morning, and on the London Evening Standard's website. A link to the Evening Standard article is given below - subscription required to view full article, but it starts:

The Elizabeth line station at Bond Street is set to open on October 24, it was announced on Wednesday.

 
Last edited:

Thirteen

Established Member
Joined
3 Oct 2021
Messages
1,899
Location
London
Annoyingly, the Central Section is closed on Saturday 29th due to engineering works so will have to wait until the week after to go visit it.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
11,003
Location
London
Annoyingly, the Central Section is closed on Saturday 29th due to engineering works so will have to wait until the week after to go visit it.

Which will be the first day of through running if you go on Sunday!
 

mic505

Member
Joined
26 Nov 2016
Messages
192
Temporary until May 2023. Needs to marry up with a major timetable change and the full 24tph and it won't be arranged for the December one. I'm sure they'll be mitigations for passengers; Reading trains often arrive early waiting a platform into Paddington already and 7 minutes is very much a maximum.

It's a bit of a bodged timetable, but its still better than currently assuming that through running doesn't turn into a GTR-2018-style fiasco; that was mainly due to driver route knowledge, which isn't an issue here though.
Auto-reversal west of Paddington would be eliminated from 2026, when Old Oak Common Station (HS2) is built, so all Shenfield and/or a few Abbey Wood trains would terminate and reverse there.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
11,003
Location
London
Auto-reversal west of Paddington would be eliminated from 2026, when Old Oak Common Station (HS2) is built, so all Shenfield and/or a few Abbey Wood trains would terminate and reverse there.

Sure, although not relevant to the timetable now or immediately coming up. It would theoretically be 12tph terminating with space for 24tph Paddington - Old Oak but that’s for another day.

As it stands, auto-reverse isn’t reliable enough to be ready for November.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
11,156
Location
West Wiltshire
Sure, although not relevant to the timetable now or immediately coming up. It would theoretically be 12tph terminating with space for 24tph Paddington - Old Oak but that’s for another day.

As it stands, auto-reverse isn’t reliable enough to be ready for November.

Per Elizabeth line committee Board papers (page 22)
3.7 Preparation for ELR300 is also well underway, with plans for a rollout over the Christmas 2022 period. This update is intended to deliver auto-reverse functionality, critical to the final 24 tph configuration of the railway. However, there will be no further changes to the Elizabeth line timetable until May 2023. This is due to the proximity any December 2022 change would have had to the 6 November 2022, 5b minus-linked, timetable change.
ELR300 is a software version

 

ijmad

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2016
Messages
1,856
Location
UK
ELR300 is 'intended to deliver auto-reverse functionality' but whether it actually delivers it very much remains to be seen given it was intended to work in ELR1xx and ELR2xx releases and didn't!
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
11,156
Location
West Wiltshire
ELR300 is 'intended to deliver auto-reverse functionality' but whether it actually delivers it very much remains to be seen given it was intended to work in ELR1xx and ELR2xx releases and didn't!

per the Elizabeth line committee P4/6 (page 33)
Autoreverse – While progress has been made and an integrated programme has been drafted, construction timescales for fence and closed circuit TV (CCTV) have not yet been verified. The assurance work stream needs to be developed as soon as possible and roles and responsibilities clarified now that CRL will be responsible for this activity
The feasibility studies undertaken by the proposed contractors were issued for the civil, fencing and signage scope on 12 August 2022. Confirmation of the access to undertake the works is critical. Assurance roles and responsibilities have been confirmed (5 August 2022) with the integrated assurance plan issued on 19 August 2022.

What is all this about, fencing and signs being specified as recently as August 2022. Presumably the auto reverse software cannot read signs fixed on fences so why does it need extra signs and fences that weren’t required in July. Is there suddenly a problem with stray pedestrians in the reversal area?

 

stuu

Established Member
Joined
2 Sep 2011
Messages
3,769
per the Elizabeth line committee P4/6 (page 33)



What is all this about, fencing and signs being specified as recently as August 2022. Presumably the auto reverse software cannot read signs fixed on fences so why does it need extra signs and fences that weren’t required in July. Is there suddenly a problem with stray pedestrians in the reversal area?

Do they plan on not clearing the trains at Paddington? If so it could be in case people are carried over and pull the emergency door release or something
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
11,003
Location
London
Do they plan on not clearing the trains at Paddington? If so it could be in case people are carried over and pull the emergency door release or something

That will remain the plan, although people carried over has happened. There does seem to be some (somewhat unfounded) paranoia with tresspassers at Westbourne Park with the driver out of the cab, but not sure where it comes from.
 

Taunton

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
12,296
There does seem to be some (somewhat unfounded) paranoia with trespassers at Westbourne Park with the driver out of the cab, but not sure where it comes from.
We've had trains with nobody in the cab on the DLR for the last 35 years, a complete network of open stations and trains, and it has never been seen as a problem. It also, of course, has auto-reverse as well, but that presumably falls into a "not invented here" category for Crossrail.

I really wouldn't be surprised if, given the note above about extending to Old Oak anyway in four years' time, that the whole auto-reverse boondoggle is not given up.
 

mrmartin

Established Member
Joined
17 Dec 2012
Messages
1,295
Any update on 4G on Elizabeth line? I think it was meant to be done by the end of the year, which is fast approaching!
 

43066

Veteran Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
12,089
Location
London
We've had trains with nobody in the cab on the DLR for the last 35 years, a complete network of open stations and trains, and it has never been seen as a problem.

What’s considered safe/acceptable changes over time, so what was acceptable when built 35 years ago might not be so now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top