Station announcements do mention every stop currently I believe. Not on-train.They don't announce every stop currently? It's normally "This is the TfL Rail service to XXX. The next station is YYY".
Station announcements do mention every stop currently I believe. Not on-train.They don't announce every stop currently? It's normally "This is the TfL Rail service to XXX. The next station is YYY".
My fiver is on a very quiet soft launch, with a more public one a few weeks later.
Out west it can be useful to have this, because stopping patterns are somewhat ‘irregular’. Heathrow services call at Acton Main Line, Hanwell and West Ealing whereas Reading services do not. Hayes and Harlington services (I think) call at Hanwell and West Ealing but NOT Acton Main Line. In the morning and evening peak, some Reading-Paddington services also skip Southall and Hayes and Harlington.
My suggestion would be either to announce all stops until the calling pattern becomes regular (e.g. “calling at Bond Street, Paddington, Ealing Broadway, Southall and all stations to Reading”) or to use all stations, semi-fast and fast in the same way as the Metropolitan line, with on-train route diagrams showing ‘passing loops’ for the peak services. After Paddington, it would probably make sense to show the route to Heathrow a separate branch from that to Reading, with connector blobs at Ealing Broadway, Southall and Hayes and Harlington. This way, it is clear that Reading trains never call at Acton, West Ealing, Hanwell.
Was taught never to announce stopping patterns using the word ‘Fast’, as it invariably ends up being anything other than that.
I’ve been out and about in London today and noticed a lot of uncovered roundels.I got off at the rather attractive Hanwell station two days ago and noticed the uncovered roundel is in position already.
Interesting service frequency ?. And a blip on the new screen where the sixth service would be !.I’ve been out and about in London today and noticed a lot of uncovered roundels.
It might have been noted already but it also looked like the advertising boards at Abbey Wood had ads on them - surely a good sign that opening is near as no company would pay for ads that nobody is seeing.
Finally, the CrossRail departures board at Abbey Wood was showing the departures towards Paddington, with just a small plaque to inform customers that the line isn’t yet in service.
I’m a little surprised it’s using the now considered ‘old’ tech of an LED based screen than a newer LCD one to be honest!Interesting service frequency ?. And a blip on the new screen where the sixth service would be !.
Oh yes, I had not thought of that.I’m a little surprised it’s using the now considered ‘old’ tech of an LED based screen than a newer LCD one to be honest!
Were they current tech in December 2018 though?I’m a little surprised it’s using the now considered ‘old’ tech of an LED based screen than a newer LCD one to be honest!
That had crossed my mind that they could have been installed then. But, quite possibly - when did Greater Anglia start installing theirs? Pretty sure they had them in January 2019?Were they current tech in December 2018 though?![]()
The longest medieval cathedral in the world, Winchester, is 170 metres (558ft) from end to end. The new stations on the Elizabeth line are 240 metres (788ft) or more long, and sometimes nine or 10 storeys underground. And these are only the most visible manifestations of the vast volumes hollowed out of the London soil to achieve an underground railway bigger and faster than any before, of what was at one point the largest transport engineering project in Europe, decades and billions of pounds in the making, a system more technologically complex, says its chief executive, than any outside China.
Hope he realises “240m“ platforms are already commonplace all over the country, yes they’re much bigger than the typical “tube” platforms but they’re not exactly unusual in a wider context…Article in the Guardian on the Liz Line from an "architecture critic"
There’s some sort of event on at Paddington today with all sorts of press and other social media Railway folk. Is this another evacuation or something more?
- Edited -
Just found this on twitter which seems to have answered my own question!
How many of those are enclosed over their full length though? Most overall roofs don't extend over the full length of the platforms. Unfortunately I can't think of any reference sources that would tell me the answer to that!Hope he realises “240m“ platforms are already commonplace all over the country, yes they’re much bigger than the typical “tube” platforms but they’re not exactly unusual in a wider context…
There are also ads in the Crossrail passageways behind the barriers at TCRI’ve been out and about in London today and noticed a lot of uncovered roundels.
It might have been noted already but it also looked like the advertising boards at Abbey Wood had ads on them - surely a good sign that opening is near as no company would pay for ads that nobody is seeing.
Finally, the CrossRail departures board at Abbey Wood was showing the departures towards Paddington, with just a small plaque to inform customers that the line isn’t yet in service.
Don't quite understand the "" around architecture critic. Rowan Moore is the architecture critic of the Guardian. Or are only 'railway experts' allowed to have a view on how the stations look and feel ?Article in the Guardian on the Liz Line from an "architecture critic"
Well there's City Thameslink, fully enclosed which has a capability of 24 trains per hour in each direction, with current train lengths of up to 242m long the platforms are 299m northbound and 296m southbound. If the Crossrail platforms were only 240m long a 12-car class 700 wouldn't even fit there. I was under the impression that the core platform bores were long enough to accept 11-car (249m) trains in the future should passenger traffic make that necessary.How many of those are enclosed over their full length though? Most overall roofs don't extend over the full length of the platforms. Unfortunately I can't think of any reference sources that would tell me the answer to that!
Not him, but I have strong opinions on the subject of architects and architecture critics, of which "incestuous" is probably the kindest.Don't quite understand the "" around architecture critic. Rowan Moore is the architecture critic of the Guardian. Or are only 'railway experts' allowed to have a view on how the stations look and feel ?
Is that in the timetables now?City Thameslink, fully enclosed which has a capability of 24 trains per hour in each direction
I said "a capability of 24 trains per hour". That includes power supplies, signalling and passenger handling for that number, plus an excess if needed to recover from disruption.Is that in the timetables now?
I know that 24tph was always the claimed target. I was asking if they have ever demonstrated that it will be achievable in real life. Personally I doubt it: the rail industry has a history of promising capabilities that turn out to be impossible to deliver.I said "a capability of 24 trains per hour". That includes power supplies, signalling and passenger handling for that number, plus an excess if needed to recover from disruption.
However, there are 14 & 15 trains timetabled to pass through St Pancras International Platforms A & B respectively tomorrow between 07:30 and 08:29. Similarly, there are 14 scheduled to pass through each way between 17:00 and 17:59. Both these are under what must be an abbreviated timetable. It will change when the true post-pandemic service is finally introduced.