• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Crossrail - Construction updates and progress towards opening (now expected 24 May 2022)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

t_packer

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2017
Messages
18
Out west it can be useful to have this, because stopping patterns are somewhat ‘irregular’. Heathrow services call at Acton Main Line, Hanwell and West Ealing whereas Reading services do not. Hayes and Harlington services (I think) call at Hanwell and West Ealing but NOT Acton Main Line. In the morning and evening peak, some Reading-Paddington services also skip Southall and Hayes and Harlington.

My suggestion would be either to announce all stops until the calling pattern becomes regular (e.g. “calling at Bond Street, Paddington, Ealing Broadway, Southall and all stations to Reading”) or to use all stations, semi-fast and fast in the same way as the Metropolitan line, with on-train route diagrams showing ‘passing loops’ for the peak services. After Paddington, it would probably make sense to show the route to Heathrow a separate branch from that to Reading, with connector blobs at Ealing Broadway, Southall and Hayes and Harlington. This way, it is clear that Reading trains never call at Acton, West Ealing, Hanwell.
 

DynamicSpirit

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2012
Messages
9,213
Location
SE London
My fiver is on a very quiet soft launch, with a more public one a few weeks later.

Is a very quiet soft launch possible? I'd have thought that, even if they just tried opening it without announcing anything, in these days of social media the news would spread like wildfire within hours.
 

kevin_roche

Member
Joined
26 Feb 2019
Messages
997
Out west it can be useful to have this, because stopping patterns are somewhat ‘irregular’. Heathrow services call at Acton Main Line, Hanwell and West Ealing whereas Reading services do not. Hayes and Harlington services (I think) call at Hanwell and West Ealing but NOT Acton Main Line. In the morning and evening peak, some Reading-Paddington services also skip Southall and Hayes and Harlington.

My suggestion would be either to announce all stops until the calling pattern becomes regular (e.g. “calling at Bond Street, Paddington, Ealing Broadway, Southall and all stations to Reading”) or to use all stations, semi-fast and fast in the same way as the Metropolitan line, with on-train route diagrams showing ‘passing loops’ for the peak services. After Paddington, it would probably make sense to show the route to Heathrow a separate branch from that to Reading, with connector blobs at Ealing Broadway, Southall and Hayes and Harlington. This way, it is clear that Reading trains never call at Acton, West Ealing, Hanwell.

Sounds sensible to me. I was about to write something very similar myself. I wonder though if the Transport secretary's edict about reducing announcements will apply, or perhaps it doesn't on TfL.
 

rd749249

Member
Joined
15 Sep 2015
Messages
187
Was taught never to announce stopping patterns using the word ‘Fast’, as it invariably ends up being anything other than that.
 

davetheguard

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
1,939
I got off at the rather attractive Hanwell station two days ago and noticed the uncovered roundel is in position already.
 

Attachments

  • DSC07534.JPG
    DSC07534.JPG
    1.1 MB · Views: 207

Yindee8191

Member
Joined
16 Mar 2019
Messages
181
I got off at the rather attractive Hanwell station two days ago and noticed the uncovered roundel is in position already.
I’ve been out and about in London today and noticed a lot of uncovered roundels.
It might have been noted already but it also looked like the advertising boards at Abbey Wood had ads on them - surely a good sign that opening is near as no company would pay for ads that nobody is seeing.
Finally, the CrossRail departures board at Abbey Wood was showing the departures towards Paddington, with just a small plaque to inform customers that the line isn’t yet in service.
 

Attachments

  • 70D3B412-118B-47C4-8EFD-6F70960EEB67.jpeg
    70D3B412-118B-47C4-8EFD-6F70960EEB67.jpeg
    1.8 MB · Views: 247

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
9,673
Location
Croydon
I’ve been out and about in London today and noticed a lot of uncovered roundels.
It might have been noted already but it also looked like the advertising boards at Abbey Wood had ads on them - surely a good sign that opening is near as no company would pay for ads that nobody is seeing.
Finally, the CrossRail departures board at Abbey Wood was showing the departures towards Paddington, with just a small plaque to inform customers that the line isn’t yet in service.
Interesting service frequency ?. And a blip on the new screen where the sixth service would be !.
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,640
Location
Hampshire
Interesting service frequency ?. And a blip on the new screen where the sixth service would be !.
I’m a little surprised it’s using the now considered ‘old’ tech of an LED based screen than a newer LCD one to be honest!
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,640
Location
Hampshire
Were they current tech in December 2018 though? ;)
That had crossed my mind that they could have been installed then. But, quite possibly - when did Greater Anglia start installing theirs? Pretty sure they had them in January 2019?
 

dosxuk

Established Member
Joined
2 Jan 2011
Messages
2,439
I'd much rather a nice clear, bright and easily readable LED screen than the ANIMATION EVERYWHERE confused fanciness of the GA screens.

We moved away from computer monitors as platform displays to LED because they were better. I'm yet to see any of the new batch of computer monitors improving things.
 

camflyer

Member
Joined
13 Feb 2018
Messages
1,165
Article in the Guardian on the Liz Line from an "architecture critic"


The longest medieval cathedral in the world, Winchester, is 170 metres (558ft) from end to end. The new stations on the Elizabeth line are 240 metres (788ft) or more long, and sometimes nine or 10 storeys underground. And these are only the most visible manifestations of the vast volumes hollowed out of the London soil to achieve an underground railway bigger and faster than any before, of what was at one point the largest transport engineering project in Europe, decades and billions of pounds in the making, a system more technologically complex, says its chief executive, than any outside China.

 
Joined
25 Mar 2016
Messages
140
There’s some sort of event on at Paddington today with all sorts of press and other social media Railway folk. Is this another evacuation or something more?

- Edited -

Just found this on twitter which seems to have answered my own question!
 

Attachments

  • 9BB3A835-4787-4561-93AB-AF8B04044AF1.jpeg
    9BB3A835-4787-4561-93AB-AF8B04044AF1.jpeg
    106.4 KB · Views: 207

SynthD

Established Member
Joined
4 Apr 2020
Messages
2,040
Location
UK
That sounds more a test of Abbey Wood than of Paddington. If I wanted to test Paddington I’d have a set of people at each usable station with their own shuttle to Pad and back. I could be describing a future test.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,282
Article in the Guardian on the Liz Line from an "architecture critic"
Hope he realises “240m“ platforms are already commonplace all over the country, yes they’re much bigger than the typical “tube” platforms but they’re not exactly unusual in a wider context…
 

kevin_roche

Member
Joined
26 Feb 2019
Messages
997
There’s some sort of event on at Paddington today with all sorts of press and other social media Railway folk. Is this another evacuation or something more?

- Edited -

Just found this on twitter which seems to have answered my own question!

Yes, the timetable involves 8 trains in 20 minutes.
 

Attachments

  • crossrail.2022.03.12.PNG
    crossrail.2022.03.12.PNG
    70.1 KB · Views: 118

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
6,012
Hope he realises “240m“ platforms are already commonplace all over the country, yes they’re much bigger than the typical “tube” platforms but they’re not exactly unusual in a wider context…
How many of those are enclosed over their full length though? Most overall roofs don't extend over the full length of the platforms. Unfortunately I can't think of any reference sources that would tell me the answer to that!
 
Joined
22 Jun 2013
Messages
603
I’ve been out and about in London today and noticed a lot of uncovered roundels.
It might have been noted already but it also looked like the advertising boards at Abbey Wood had ads on them - surely a good sign that opening is near as no company would pay for ads that nobody is seeing.
Finally, the CrossRail departures board at Abbey Wood was showing the departures towards Paddington, with just a small plaque to inform customers that the line isn’t yet in service.
There are also ads in the Crossrail passageways behind the barriers at TCR
 

Bigbru

Member
Joined
4 Jun 2017
Messages
89
From the events the stations also have underground maps without the Elizabeth Line on them. These will be out of date as soon as the line opens and anyone can see them!
 

WesternS

Member
Joined
5 Aug 2015
Messages
73
Article in the Guardian on the Liz Line from an "architecture critic"
Don't quite understand the "" around architecture critic. Rowan Moore is the architecture critic of the Guardian. Or are only 'railway experts' allowed to have a view on how the stations look and feel ?

As for the article itself, (a) why shouldn't an architecture critic review the architecture of the stations - it is much more than 'engineering' and in many places it is fairly stunning, (b) Rowan Moore makes no comment on the S&C, rail bed, electrification standards, platform information screens, timetable frequency or anything more railway engineering that seems to exercise some of this forum and (c) from reading the article, it's a pretty positive review of the scheme itself, its financing and background, notwithstanding the griping of non-Londoners/those with professional axes to grind (in fact the only personal peice of snark appears to be about Will Alsop's North Greenwich station on the Jubilee Line which I've not visited so have no comment on). The questions it raises about future use - both around London itself and the commuter market are fair ones to ask, and well-handled.

It's amazing how the fact that it will take less than 30 minutes from Woolwich/Canary Wharf to Heathrow when the alternative is double the time on the Central/Jubilee & Piccadilly Lines or HEL with at least one change is forgotten. Go and read Mark Paul's article in the Irish Times about parking charges for drop-offs at Dublin Airport to see how users believe that infrastructure fails to function properly and fairly without the drive and determination to do long term planning and invest.

Although tbh, I'm far more interested in what Diamond Geezer's review will be.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
16,035
Location
St Albans
How many of those are enclosed over their full length though? Most overall roofs don't extend over the full length of the platforms. Unfortunately I can't think of any reference sources that would tell me the answer to that!
Well there's City Thameslink, fully enclosed which has a capability of 24 trains per hour in each direction, with current train lengths of up to 242m long the platforms are 299m northbound and 296m southbound. If the Crossrail platforms were only 240m long a 12-car class 700 wouldn't even fit there. I was under the impression that the core platform bores were long enough to accept 11-car (249m) trains in the future should passenger traffic make that necessary.
 

eldomtom2

On Moderation
Joined
6 Oct 2018
Messages
2,386
Don't quite understand the "" around architecture critic. Rowan Moore is the architecture critic of the Guardian. Or are only 'railway experts' allowed to have a view on how the stations look and feel ?
Not him, but I have strong opinions on the subject of architects and architecture critics, of which "incestuous" is probably the kindest.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
16,035
Location
St Albans
Is that in the timetables now?
I said "a capability of 24 trains per hour". That includes power supplies, signalling and passenger handling for that number, plus an excess if needed to recover from disruption.
However, there are 14 & 15 trains timetabled to pass through St Pancras International Platforms A & B respectively tomorrow between 07:30 and 08:29. Similarly, there are 14 scheduled to pass through each way between 17:00 and 17:59. Both these are under what must be an abbreviated timetable. It will change when the true post-pandemic service is finally introduced.
 

Nottingham59

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2019
Messages
3,334
Location
Nottingham
I said "a capability of 24 trains per hour". That includes power supplies, signalling and passenger handling for that number, plus an excess if needed to recover from disruption.
However, there are 14 & 15 trains timetabled to pass through St Pancras International Platforms A & B respectively tomorrow between 07:30 and 08:29. Similarly, there are 14 scheduled to pass through each way between 17:00 and 17:59. Both these are under what must be an abbreviated timetable. It will change when the true post-pandemic service is finally introduced.
I know that 24tph was always the claimed target. I was asking if they have ever demonstrated that it will be achievable in real life. Personally I doubt it: the rail industry has a history of promising capabilities that turn out to be impossible to deliver.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top