• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Cricket

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
8,234
I think Sky have had him lined up for years, as they need someone younger and more in touch with the modern England side.
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
8,234
Just wondering if there's any of the older members of the Sky Team up for retirement
Sky seemed to have "culled" the older members already, but now have a lot of commentators all from the same era from the 90s and early 2000s
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,391
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Back to the subject of the current Test Match, all being equal weather-wise, Australia would have had two full days to score the runs required to win (average of 200 runs per day) and in their reply, had passed the runs required per hour without the loss of a single wicket in their second innings.
 

Whistler40145

Established Member
Joined
30 Apr 2010
Messages
6,149
Location
Lancashire
Back to the subject of the current Test Match, all being equal weather-wise, Australia would have had two full days to score the runs required to win (average of 200 runs per day) and in their reply, had passed the runs required per hour without the loss of a single wicket in their second innings.
Fingers crossed for a dry day tomorrow, but wondering if any moisture in the wicket will assist our bowlers?
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,671
It might do, but a wet ball from the damp outfield will hamper them.
If the outfield was that wet there'd be no play. Looks like England might be going into last day with two (three if you include Stokes) bowlers nursing injuries. Is anyone surprised that Wood looks like he hasn't managed to complete three consecutive matches? He's only ever managed it once before, whereas Australia's Starc, their fastest bowler, has managed the last four. Not saying this with hindsight, I posted the opinion a few days ago, Tongue's pace and youth should definitely have been utilised. We have two teams of Dad's Armies.:frown:
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
8,234
If the outfield was that wet there'd be no play. Looks like England might be going into last day with two (three if you include Stokes) bowlers nursing injuries. Is anyone surprised that Wood looks like he hasn't managed to complete three consecutive matches? He's only ever managed it once before, whereas Australia's Starc, their fastest bowler, has managed the last four. Not saying this with hindsight, I posted the opinion a few days ago, Tongue's pace and youth should definitely have been utilised. We have two teams of Dad's Armies.:frown:
Even when they dry the outfield out, there will still be some residual dampness. And the ball will get wet when it goes over the ropes where there may still be damp patches or even puddles.
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,671
Even when they dry the outfield out, there will still be some residual dampness. And the ball will get wet when it goes over the ropes where there may still be damp patches or even puddles.
Yes, but constant rain interruptions tend to affect the batting side more. Should Australia win easily (which I don't believe will happen) it won't be because England were impeded by a wet ball.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,623
I wondered if something was up when his fiancé was on TMS

That was because she’s not doing her usual Saturday afternoon Radio 1 show this weekend, as most of R1 is in Ibiza, but she’s not (looking after the nipper). Presumably BBC said ‘we still need you in on Saturday’, and it’s an obvious choice.
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
8,234
Yes, but constant rain interruptions tend to affect the batting side more. Should Australia win easily (which I don't believe will happen) it won't be because England were impeded by a wet ball.
The interruptions are worse for the batting side, but the wet ball is a major handicap for the bowling side, as the ball becomes bloated and loses its hardness, and it becomes harder for the spinners to grip. It also stops the roughing up needed for reverse swing.
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,671
I'm going to stick my neck out and predict an England win or a draw later. As soon as play gets underway, the opening partnership will be broken, then a second, possibly even a third, follow shortly. They'll be shared between Broad and Anderson, and the former will charge in knees pumping once he's got his first, for one last time. Anderson too will be keen to give his mate the best send-off and will bowl better than at any time in this series. Australia will still be looking for the win (the Australian public demand no less) until it becomes clear it's unlikely to happen, possibly because of time lost to rain. Bad light may well come into play, so the spinner/s is/are crucial. I have a feeling Bairstow might become the hero or villain of the last hour of play.

Plenty of room for egg on my face there, and I shan't even be able to follow it after midday because of a medical procedure.
 

75A

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2021
Messages
2,034
Location
Ireland (ex Brighton 75A)
The interruptions are worse for the batting side, but the wet ball is a major handicap for the bowling side, as the ball becomes bloated and loses its hardness, and it becomes harder for the spinners to grip. It also stops the roughing up needed for reverse swing.
Even more excuses for Broad to pester the Umpire for a ball change then.
 

GS250

Member
Joined
18 Mar 2019
Messages
1,031
If we can't finish this off then some damage will be done to our confidence. Failing to bowl a side out twice when 8 down and time to spare is not a good look.
 

GS250

Member
Joined
18 Mar 2019
Messages
1,031
Heads up England. Generally gave a good account of yourselves. So near yet so far series wise.

Need to start climbing that test table now and looking at life beyond Broad and Anderson. The latter of whom should no longer be an automatic selection.
 

HST43257

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2020
Messages
1,650
Location
York
An amazing end, could not have been better for England. Yesterday, with Broad going out to a guard of hon our with Jimmy, then hitting his last ball for 6. Then today, the excitement of the collapse and the bail change of course! All topped off with Broad taking the last wicket and going straight over to celebrate with and hug Jimmy Anderson, before walking off the field arm-in-arm with (fellow retire-ee) Moeen Ali. Poetic, and quite amazing all round. Credit to Australia as well for an excellent series.

I guess we then look forward to the 50 over World Cup and eventually the Test series in India. Any thoughts on who should make both squads? My thoughts below:

ODI World Cup - (15 + 3 travelling reserves):
Jason Roy, Jonny Bairstow, Joe Root, Dawid Malan, Harry Brook, Jos Buttler, Will Jacks, Liam Livingstone, Moeen Ali, Sam Curran, Chris Woakes, Adil Rashid, Mark Wood, Jofra Archer, Reece Topley (Sam Billings, Luke Wood)

India Test series (20):
Ben Duckett, Keaton Jennings, Zac Crawley, Dan Lawrence, Ollie Pope, Joe Root, Harry Brook, Jonny Bairstow, Ben Stokes, Ben Foakes, Liam Dawson, Will Jacks, Rehan Ahmed, Jamie Overton, Mark Wood, Ollie Robinson, Jack Leach, Josh Tongue, Matt Parkinson, Jimmy Anderson.

For my ODIWC squad, it’d have 3 pacers and 3 spinners (+ Root Probably) as per what Matthew Mott has said it’ll be, picking 5/6 of the batters plus a spinning batting all-rounder, but could extend batting lineup with Jacks opening. Moeen at 7 and Curran at 8, then 2 of Woakes/Wood/Archer/Topley, plus Adil Rashid. Looking very strong

For my India Test squad, it’d have 2 of Duckett/Jennings/Crawley opening, Lawrence/Pope at 3, Root at 4, Brook/Bairstow at 5, Stokes at 6, Foakes at 7. 3 pacers (Stokes, Wood/Overton/Tongue, Anderson/Robinson) and 3 spinners (Root, Leach/Parkinson, Ahmed/Jacks/Dawson). After the Ashes I struggle to drop Crawley but on a spinning pitch I just don’t know.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,623
We'll never know for sure but what would have been the outcome at Old Trafford had the weather not intervened?

England would have won.

The umpires should be questioned over that ball change. It was clearly not a like for like replacement.

A hint of sourness in the grapes there perhaps?



It has been a brilliant series - 4 close matches, twists and turns everywhere, either side could have won all the matches that had a result, the series has at last got Zak Crawley playing consistently, superb stuff
 

SuspectUsual

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2018
Messages
6,683
The umpires should be questioned over that ball change. It was clearly not a like for like replacement.

I really don't think there was anything done deliberately, but it is utterly astonishing that the nearest ball they could find to replace one that was 37 overs old was one that was about 15 overs old and was clearly in a far better state. For a multi-million pound game at the pinnacle of a national sport its not a good look
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
8,234
Will England go back to Foakes or is Bairstow keeping the gloves?
If India is anything like last time, they'll produce 5 bunsens, meaning that spin bowling and being able to keep to spinners becomes crucial, so Foakes hopefully.
 

Top